Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Alometría craneana de mamíferos y su posible asociación con los hábitos arborícolas y terrestres
dc.contributor.advisor | Ramírez Chaves, Héctor Emilio | |
dc.contributor.author | Sanchez Corrales, Juan José | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-14T16:06:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-14T16:06:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-07-01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/18905 | |
dc.description | Ilustraciones, fotos | spa |
dc.description.abstract | spa:La morfología del cráneo de los mamíferos cuenta con adaptaciones y trayectorias alométricas asociadas con su dieta, ecología, y afinidades filogenéticas. En particular, el tipo de hábito (e.g., terrestre, arborícola) de una especie de mamífero puede influenciar la alometría de sus cráneos. Para evaluar lo anterior, se obtuvieron medidas craneales lineales de representantes de nueve de 27 órdenes taxonómicos de mamíferos vivientes, con hábitos contrastantes, las cuales fueron analizadas mediante un análisis de componentes principales y discriminantes lineares. Los resultados indicaron patrones alométricos que pueden ser asociados a la selección de un comportamiento o habito terrestre, arborícola o mixto. Esto visto en grupos que se segregaron con tendencias hacia un eje geométrico en específico como Folivora, Primates, algunos individuos de las familias Procyoinidae y Felidae, grupos con preferencias por hábitos más arborícolas. En contraste, otros grupos como Artiodactyla, Canidae, Cingulata, Didelphimorphia, Paucituberculata y demás individuos de la familia Procyonidae que comparten tendencias más terrestres o mixtas se agruparon en el eje opuesto del espacio geométrico. Adicional a este tipo de patrones, también se encontró un fuerte remanente filogenético que definen la forma de los cráneos de algunos grupos, como lo fueron la cercanía de dos órdenes de Ameridelphia (Didelphimorphia y Paucituberculata) en el espacio morfométrico y la agrupación formada por las familias de Rodentia evaluadas y el orden Lagomorpha que conforman el clado Glires. Esto demuestra que, a pesar de las presiones ecológicas, en algunos grupos aún se conserva una morfología en el cráneo asociada a líneas evolutivas. En conclusión, si bien se observan remanentes filogenéticos en la composición de los cráneos de los mamíferos, presiones ecológicas como lo es el hábito, también afectan la alometría craneana en estos organismos. | spa |
dc.description.abstract | eng:Skull morphology of mammals exhibits adaptations and allometric trajectories associated with their diet, ecology, and phylogenetic affinities. In particular, the type of habit (e.g., terrestrial, arboreal) of a mammal species can influence its skulls allometry. To assess this, linear measurements of the skull of species of nine of 27 taxonomic orders of living mammals with contrasting habits were obtained and analyzed by principal component and linear discriminant analysis. The results indicated allometric patterns that may be associated with the selection of a terrestrial, arboreal, or mixed behavior or habitus. This was seen in assemblages that segregated with tendencies towards a specific geometric axis such as Folivora, Primates, some individuals of the families Procyoinidae and Felidae, groups with preferences for habits more arboreal. In contrast, other groups such as Artiodactyla, Canidae, Cingulata, Didelphimorphia, Paucituberculata and other individuals of the family Procyonidae that share more terrestrial or mixed tendencies were grouped on the opposite axis of the geometric space. In addition to this type of patterns, a strong phylogenetic remnant was also found that define the shape of the skulls of some groups, such as the proximity of two orders of Ameridelphia (Didelphimorphia and Paucituberculata) in the morphometric space and the grouping formed by the families of Rodentia evaluated and the order Lagomorpha that make up the Glires clade. This demonstrates that, despite ecological pressures, skull morphology associated with evolutionary lines is still preserved in some groups. In conclusion, although phylogenetic remnants are observed in the composition of mammalian skulls, ecological pressures such as habitus also affect cranial allometry in these organisms. | eng |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Introducción / Materiales y métodos / Toma de datos / Análisis de datos / Resultados / Discusión / Conclusión / Referencias bibliográficas | spa |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | spa |
dc.language.iso | eng | spa |
dc.language.iso | spa | spa |
dc.title | Alometría craneana de mamíferos y su posible asociación con los hábitos arborícolas y terrestres | spa |
dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Pregrado | spa |
dc.contributor.researchgroup | GEBIOME Genética, biodiversidad y manejo de ecosistemas (Categoría A1) | spa |
dc.description.degreelevel | Universitario | spa |
dc.identifier.instname | Universidad de Caldas | spa |
dc.identifier.reponame | Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Caldas | spa |
dc.identifier.repourl | https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/ | spa |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales | spa |
dc.publisher.place | Manizales | spa |
dc.relation.references | Anderson, R.A., Macbrayer, L.D. & Herrel, A. (2008). Bite force in vertebrates: opportunities and caveats for use of a nonpareil whole-animal performance measure. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 93, 709–720. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bertrand, O. C., Amador-Mughal, F., & Silcox, M. T. (2017). Virtual endocast of the early Oligocene Cedromus wilsoni (Cedromurinae) and brain evolution in squirrels. Journal of Anatomy, 230(1), 128–151. doi:10.1111/joa.12537 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bertrand, O. C. & Silcox, M. T. (2016) First virtual endocasts of a fossil rodent: Ischyromys typus (Ischyromyidae) and brain evolution in rodents. J Vert Paleontol 36, 1–19. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Jeffrey J. E. & Richardson, M. K. (2003). Is sequence heterochrony an important evolutionary mechanism in mammals? J. Mammal. Evol. 10, 335–361. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bubadué, J., Cáceres, N., dos Santos Carvalho, R., & Meloro, C. (2016). Ecogeographical variation in skull shape of South- American Canids: Abiotic or biotic processes? Evolutionary Biology, 43, 145–159. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1169 2-015-9362- 3. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Camargo, N. F., Machado, L. F., Mendonça, A. F. & Vieira, E. M. (2019). Cranial shape predicts arboreal activity of Sigmodontinae rodents. Journal of Zoology, 308(2), 128– 138. doi:10.1111/jzo.12659 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Cardini, A. & Polly, P. D. (2013). Larger mammals have longer faces because of size-related constraints on skull form. Nature Communications, 4(1), 2458 doi:10.1038/ncomms3458. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Cheverud, J. M. (1982). Relationships among ontogenetic, static, and evolutionary allometry. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 59(2), 139–149. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330590204. | spa |
dc.relation.references | D'Elía, G. & Teta, P. (2021). Illustrated Checklist of the Mammals of the World. Journal of Mammalogy 102(5), 1445-1446. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyab075. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Damasceno, E. M., Hingst-Zaher, E., & Astúa, D. (2013). Bite force and encephalization in the Canidae (Mammalia: Carnivora). Journal of Zoology, 290, 246–254. https ://doi.org/10.1111/ jzo.12030. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Depew, M. J., Tucker, A.S. & Sharpe, P. T. (2002). Craniofacial development. In: Rossant J., Tam P.P.L. (Eds.) Mouse development: patterning, morphogenesis, and organogenesis. Academic Press, San Diego. 421–498p. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Drake, A. G. & Klingenberg, C. P. (2010). Large-scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: disparity and modularity. Am. Nat. 175, 289–301. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Eisenberg, J.F & Wilson, D.E. (1983). Relative brain size and demographic strategies in didelphid marsupials. Am. Nat. 118, 1–15. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Emerson, S. B., & Bramble, D. M. (1993). Scaling, allometry and skull design. In J. Hanken & B. K. Hall (Eds.), The skull (pp. 384–416). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Galatius, A., Berta, A., Frandsen, M. S., & Goodall, R. N. P. (2011). Interspecific variation of ontogeny and skull shape among porpoises (Phocoenidae). Journal of Morphology, 272, 136–148. https ://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10900. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Goswami, A. (2006a). Cranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution. Am. Nat. 168, 270–280. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Goswami, A. (2006b). Morphological integration in the carnivoran skull. Evolution 60, 169–183. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Goswami, A., Milne, N. & Wroe, S. (2011). Biting through constraints: cranial morphology, disparity and convergence across living and fossil carnivorous mammals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 278, 1831–1839. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Goswami, A. & Polly, P. D. (2010). The influence of modularity on cranial morphological disparity in Carnivora and Primates (Mammalia). PLoS ONE 5(3): e9517. doi:10.1371/ journal. pone.0009517. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Goswami, A., Polly, P. D., Mock, O. B., & Sánchez-Villagra, M. R. (2012). Shape, variance and integration during craniogenesis: contrasting marsupial and placental mammals. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25(5), 862–872. doi:10.1111/j.1420- 9101.2012.02477. x | spa |
dc.relation.references | Gould, S. J. (1966). Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41, 587–638. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Henderson, K., Pantinople, J., McCabe, K., Richards, H. L. & Milne, N. (2017). Forelimb bone curvature in terrestrial and arboreal mammals. Virginia Abdala. PeerJ 5, e3229; DOI 10.7717/peerj.3229 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hill, J. (1990). J. F. Eisenberg 1989. Mammals of the Neotropics. Volume 1. The Northern Neotropics. University of Chicago Press, USA. x 449 pages. Clothbound: ISBN 0- 23 226-19539-2. Paperback: ISBN 0-226-19540-6. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 6(3), 290-290. doi:10.1017/S0266467400004521 | spa |
dc.relation.references | James, F. C. (1982). The ecological morphology of birds. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 19: 265– 275. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Kassambara, A. & Mundt, F. (2020). factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. R package version 1.0.7. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=factoextra | spa |
dc.relation.references | Klingenberg, C. P. (2010). Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches. Nat. Genet. 11, 623–635. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Klingenberg, C. P. (2013). Cranial integration and modularity: insights into evolution and development from morphometric data. Hystrix It. J. Mammal. 24, 43–58. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Lieberman, D. E. (2011). The evolution of the human head. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Mace, G. M., Harvey, P. H. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1981) Brain size and ecology in small mammals. J Zool 193, 333–354. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Maestri, R., Patterson, B. D., Fornel, R., Monteiro, L. R., & de Freitas, T. R. O. (2016). Diet, bite force and skull morphology in the generalist rodent morphotype. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 29(11), 2191–2204. doi:10.1111/jeb.12937 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Marcus L. F., Hingst-Zaher E. & Zaher H. (2000). Application of landmark morphometrics to skulls representing the orders of living mammals. Hystrix 11(1), 27–47. doi:10.4404/ hystrix-11.1-4135. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Marroig, G., Shirai, L. T., Porto, A., de Oliveira, F. B. & De Conto V. (2009). The evolution of modularity in the mammalian skull II: evolutionary consequences. Evol. Biol. 36, 136–148. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Martinez, P. A., Marti, D. A., Molina, W. F., & Bidau, C. J. (2013). Bergmann’s rule across the equator: A case study in Cerdocyon thous (Canidae). Journal of Animal Ecology, 82, 997–1008. https ://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12076. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Bernhard, M., Schaefer, K., & Bookstein, F. L. (2004). Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. Journal of Human Evolution, 46(6), 679–698. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.03.006. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Moore, W. J. (1981). The mammalian skull. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Morales, M. M., & Giannini, N. P. (2010). Morphofunctional patterns in Neotropical felids: Species co-existence and historical assembly. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 100, 711–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01461. x. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Pilleri, G., Gihr M. & Kraus, C. (1984). Cephalization in rodents with particular reference to the Canadian beaver (Castor canadensis). In: Investigations on Beavers. (ed. Pilleri G), pp. 11–102. Berne, Switzerland: Brain Anatomy Institute. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Porto, A., De Oliveira, F. B., Shirai, L. T., De Conto, V. & Marroig, G. (2009). The evolutionof modularity in the mammalian skull I: Morphological integration patterns and magnitudes. Evol. Biol. 36, 118–135. | spa |
dc.relation.references | R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Roth, V. L. & Thorington, R. W. (1982). Relative brain size among African squirrels. J Mammal 63, 168–173. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sanchez-Villagra, M. R. (2010). Developmental palaeontology in synapsids: the fossil record of ontogeny in mammals and their closest relatives. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1685), 1139–1147. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2005. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Santana, S. E., Dumont, E. R. & Davis, J. L. (2010). Mechanics of bite force production and its relationship to diet in bats. Funct. Ecol. 24, 776–784. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Santana, S. E., Dumont, E. R. & Davis, J. L. (2010). Mechanics of bite force production and its relationship to diet in bats. Funct. Ecol. 24, 776–784. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Le, S., Josse, J. & Husson, F. (2008). FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1), 1-18. 10.18637/jss.v025.i01. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sicuro, F. L. (2011). Evolutionary trends on extant cat skull morphology (Carnivora: Felidae): A three-dimensional geometrical approach. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 103, 176– 190. https ://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01636. x. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sicuro, F. L., & Oliveira, L. F. B. (2011). Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): A phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 161, 414–462. https ://doi.org/10.111 1/j.1096- 3642.2010.00636. x. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Singleton, M. (2005). Functional shape variation in the cercopithecine masticatory complex. Mod. Morphometric. Phys. Anthropol. 319–348. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Thomason, J. J. (1991). Cranial strength in relation to estimated biting forces in some mammals. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69, 2326–2333. https ://doi.org/10.1139/z91-327. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth Edition. Springer, New York. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Wainwright, P. C. (1994). Functional morphology as a tool in ecological research. In: Ecological Morphology: Integrative Organismal Biology (P.C. Wainwright & S.M. Reilly, eds), pp. 42–59. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L. & Müller, K. (2021). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 1.0.7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Zelditch, M. L., & Carmichael, A. C. (1989). Growth and intensity of integration through postnatal growth in the skull of Sigmodon fulviventer. Journal of Mammalogy, 70, 477–484. https ://doi. org/10.2307/13814 19. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Zurano, J. P., Martinez, P. A., Canto-Hernandez, J., Montoya-Burgos, J. I., & Costa, G. C. (2017). Morphological and ecological divergence in south American canids. Journal of Biogeography, 44, 821–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12984. | spa |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | spa |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | spa |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | spa |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Adaptaciones | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Hábitos | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Mammalia | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Morfología | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Morfometría | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Adaptations | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Habits | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Mammalia | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Morphology | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Morphometrics | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Morphology | eng |
dc.subject.unesco | Mamíferos | |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f | spa |
dc.type.content | Text | spa |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis | spa |
dc.type.redcol | https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TP | spa |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | spa |
oaire.version | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | spa |
oaire.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | spa |
dc.description.degreename | Biólogo(a) | spa |
dc.publisher.program | Biología | spa |
dc.description.researchgroup | Sistemática y Ecología de Organismos Acuáticos y Terrestres | spa |
dc.rights.coar | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | spa |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
Biología [112]