Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorGallego Castaño, Liliana del Pilar
dc.contributor.authorJaramillo Buitrago, John Jairo
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-14T16:44:53Z
dc.date.available2022-01-14T16:44:53Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-13
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/17348
dc.descriptionIlustracionesspa
dc.description.abstractspa:Esta investigación es un intento de determinar el efecto del Modelo Instruccional del Taller de Escritura (WWIM) en las habilidades académicas de escritura de 26 alumnos del grado 10 de una escuela privada en Villamaría, Caldas, Colombia. Para lograr ese objetivo, se implementaron seis talleres siguiendo el modelo -mini-lección, escritura independiente y compartir-, y se evaluaron a través de 5 instrumentos. Un pre y post test, el pre y post Turniting report, el diario del docente, la encuesta del estudiante, formulario de observación no participante, herramientas de estadística descriptiva y un formulario de rúbricas de evaluación. Los resultados revelaron que las técnicas de escritura propuestas en ese modelo mejoraron la escritura académica de los alumnos y también su confianza en esta exigente habilidad.spa
dc.description.abstracteng:This Action research is an attempt to determine the effect of the Writing Workshop Instructional Model (WWIM) on the academic writing skills of 26 pupils 10th graders at a private school in Villamaría, Caldas, Colombia. To achieve that goal, six workshops following the model - mini-lesson, independent writing, and sharing-, were implemented and they were evaluated through 5 instruments. A pre and a post-test, The pre and post Turniting report, the teacher´s journal, student’s survey, non-participant observation form, descriptive statistics tools, and an evaluation rubrics form. Results revealed that the writing techniques proposed in that model improved learners’ academic writing and also their confidence in this demanding skill.eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract / Introduction / Rationale / 1. Description of the Context and Setting / 1.1 Description of the problem / 1.2 Research question and objectives / 1.2.1 Research question / 1.2.2 Objectives / 2. Theoretical Framework / Writing Theory: The cognitive writing process / The Cognitive Theory of Writing / Writing as a developmental and flexible process / Academic Writing: sorting, organizing, and categorizing ideas / Writing Workshop Instructional Model – WWIM / Writing Assessment-Rubrics and Portfolios / 2.2 Previous related studies / WWIM in English speaking countries / WWIM in non-native speaking context / National Context / 3. Research Methodology / 3.1 Type of study / 3.2 Participants / 3.3 Data Collection Instruments / 4. Research stages / 4.1 Diagnostic stage / 4.1.1. Findings Diagnostic Stage / 4.2. Action stage / 4.2.1. Cycle One / 4.2.2. Cycle Two / 4.3 Evaluation stage / 4.3.1. Results / Workshop #1. Writing a paragraph / 3 Workshop #2. Writing an Introduction / Workshop #3. Writing a conclusión / Workshop #4. Quotation and Plagiarism / Workshop #5. Cause and effects essays / Workshop #6. Advantages and disadvantages essays / 4.5. Assessing writing skills. Quantitative data instruments and analysis / 4.5.1. The Scoring Rubrics and Writing Evaluation Forms / 4.5.2. TURNITIN Platform’s results 2021. A comparable standard / 4.5.3. Pre-test / 4.5.4. Post-test / 4.5.5. Descriptive Statistics from Workshops 1 to 6. Realiability and Validity / 4.5.6. Measures of the Quantitative Instruments and Data / 4.6. Digital Portfolios-Alternative writing assessment tool / Findings and discussion / Conclusions, Pedagogical Implications, Limitations, and Questions for Further research / Referenceseng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.title“What is the effect of the Writing Workshop Instructional Model-WWIM on the academic writing skills of tenth graders in a private secondary school in Villamaría.”eng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.contributor.researchgroupREDI: Researchers in English Didactics (Categoría C)spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad de Caldasspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad de Caldasspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/spa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Artes y Humanidadesspa
dc.publisher.placeManizalesspa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Hroub, A., Shami, G., & Evans, M. (2019). The impact of the ‘writers’ workshop’approach on the L2 English writing of upper-primary students in Lebanon. The Language Learning Journal, 47(2), 159-171.spa
dc.relation.referencesAtwell, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents. Heinemann Educational Books, 316 Hanover St., Portsmouth, NH 03801.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker, E. C. (1994). Writing and reading in a first-grade writers' workshop: A parent's perspective. The Reading Teacher, 47(5), 372-377.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurns, Anne (2009). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners ESL & Applied Linguistics Professional Series. Routledge, 2009.spa
dc.relation.referencesCalkins, L. M. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Heinemann Educational Books, Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesChenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written communication, 18(1), 80-98.spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesCutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907.spa
dc.relation.referencesDorn, L. J., & Soffos, C. (2001). Scaffolding young writers: A writer's workshop approach. Stenhouse Publishers.spa
dc.relation.referencesDyson, A. H., & Freedman, S. W. (2003). Writing. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire, & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.spa
dc.relation.referencesElbow, P. (1999). Using the Collage for Collaborative Writing. Composition Studies, 27(1), 7-14.spa
dc.relation.referencesFawcett, S. (2004). Evergreen: A guide to writing with readings. Nelson Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesFountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2001). Guiding Readers and Writers, Grades 3-6: Teaching Comprehension, Genre, and Content Literacy. Heinemann, 88 Post Road West, PO Box 5007, Westport, CT 06881.spa
dc.relation.referencesGalbraith, D. (2009). Cognitive models of writing. German as a foreign language, (2-3), 7-22.spa
dc.relation.referencesGallego Castaño, L., Badia, M. C., & Garganté, A. B. (2016). Faculty feelings as writers: Relationship with writing genres, perceived competencies, and values associated to writing. Higher Education, 719-734.spa
dc.relation.referencesGhanbari, B., Barati, H., & Moinzadeh, A. (2012). Rating scales revisited: EFL writing assessment context of Iran under scrutiny. Language Testing in Asia, 2(1), 1-18.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoldkuhl, G., & Cronholm, S. (2010). Adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory: Toward multi-grounded theory. International journal of qualitative methods, 9(2), 187-205.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process approach: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 104, 396-407.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraves, K., & Xu, S. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers (No. 428 G7.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.spa
dc.relation.referencesGravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2012). Research Methods for the behavioral science (4th ed.), Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Canada.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrbich, C. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesGreen, D., Creswell, J., Shope, R. & Clark, V. (2007). Grounded theory and racial/ethnic diversity. In The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 472-492). SAGE Publications Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesHachem, A., Nabhani, M., & Bahous, R. (2008). ‘We can write!’The writing workshop for young learners. Education 3–13, 36(4), 325-337.spa
dc.relation.referencesHadley, A. O., & Reiken, E. (1993). Teaching Language in Context, and Teaching Language in Context-Workbook. Heinle & Heinle Publishers, International Thomson Publishing Book Distribution Center, 7625 Empire Drive, Florence, KY 41042.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarris, K., S. Graham, and L. Mason. 2006. Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Association 43:295–340.spa
dc.relation.referencesHargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on alternative assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 69–95.spa
dc.relation.referencesHayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of written processes. In L. W. Gregg, & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.). Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.spa
dc.relation.referencesHelsel, L., & Greenberg, D. (2007). Helping Struggling Writers Succeed: A Self‐Regulated Strategy Instruction Program. The Reading Teacher, 60(8), 752-760.spa
dc.relation.referencesHesse-Biber, S. N., & Johnson, R. B. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHogue, Ann (2008). First Steps in Academic Writing. (2nd Ed.). The Longman academic writing series.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoneycutt, R. L. (2002). Good readers/poor writers: An investigation of the strategies, understanding, and meaning that good readers who are poor writers ascribe to writing narrative text on-demand. North Carolina State Universityspa
dc.relation.referencesHudelson, S. (1994). Literacy Development of Second Language Children. In Freed Genesee, Editor. Educating Second Language Children. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHyland, Ken (2013). Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Editors: Brian Paltridge and Sue Starfield. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp 95-114.spa
dc.relation.referencesJacobs, H. L. (1981). Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. English Composition Program. Newbury House Publishers, Inc., Rowley, MA 01969.spa
dc.relation.referencesLo, J. and F. Hyland (2007). Enhancing students’ engagement and motivation in writing: the case of primary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing 16: 219–37.spa
dc.relation.referencesLuna, A. M. R., & Ortiz, L. S. H. (2013). Collaborative writing to enhance academic writing development through project work. HOW Journal, 20(1), 130-148.spa
dc.relation.referencesLynch, B. K. & Shaw, P. (2005). Portfolios, Power, and Ethics. TESOL Quarterly, 39(2), 263- 297.spa
dc.relation.referencesMertens, D. M. (2015). Philosophical assumptions and program evaluation. Enrico Guglielminetti Luciana Regina, 75, 75-85.spa
dc.relation.referencesMelgarejo Melgarejo, D. A. (2010). Assessing children ́s perceptions of writing in EFL based on the process approach. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 12(1), 70–84.spa
dc.relation.referencesMurray, D. M. (1968). A writer teaches writing: A practical method of teaching composition. Houghton Mifflin.spa
dc.relation.referencesOshima, Alice & Hogue, Ann (2000) Writing Academic English. The Longman Academic Writing Series. Longman/Pearson. 4th Edition.spa
dc.relation.referencesPatton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesPersky, H. R., Daane, M. C., & Jin, Y. (2003). The nation’s report card: Writing 2002. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesPeyton, J. K., Jones, C., Vincent, A. and Greenblatt, L. (1994). Implementing writing workshop with ESOL students: Visions and realities. TESOL Quarterly, 28(3): 469–487.spa
dc.relation.referencesPhillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. C. (2000). Philosophy, theory, and educational research. Postpositivism and educational research. Rowman & Littlefield.spa
dc.relation.referencesRay, K. W. & Laminack, L. (2001). The Writing Workshop: Working through the Hard Parts (And They're All Hard Parts). National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock No. 13176: $21.95 members, $28.95 nonmembers).spa
dc.relation.referencesRobayo Luna, A. M., & Hernandez Ortiz, L. S. (2013). Collaborative Writing to Enhance Academic Writing Development Through Project Work. HOW Journal, 20(1), 130-148.spa
dc.relation.referencesSaddler, B., & Andrade, H. (2004). The Writing Rubric. Educational Leadership, 62, 48.spa
dc.relation.referencesSadeghi, K., & Farzizadeh, B. (2012). The relationship between multiple intelligences and writing ability of Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 136-142.spa
dc.relation.referencesSalem, A. A. (2013). The Effect of Using Writer's Workshop Approach on Developing Basic Writing Skills (Mechanics of Writing) of Prospective Teachers of English in Egypt. English Language Teaching, 6(7), 33-45.spa
dc.relation.referencesShaw, D. (2001). Sailing the Seven C's of Writers' Workshop. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(4), 322-324.spa
dc.relation.referencesShohamy, E., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time. Language Testing, 13(3), 298–317.spa
dc.relation.referencesShohamy, E., Or, I. G., & May, S. (Eds.). (2017). Language testing and assessment. Springerspa
dc.relation.referencesShaughnessy, M.P. 1977. Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing. New York: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSharp, L. A. (2016). Acts of Writing: A Compilation of Six Models That Define the Processes of Writing. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 77-90.spa
dc.relation.referencesStanny, C., Nilson, L. (2014). Specifications Grading: Restoring Rigor, Motivating Students, and Saving Faculty Time. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, Anselm (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.spa
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.spa
dc.relation.referencesTomlinson, C.A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.spa
dc.relation.referencesTroia, G. A., & Graham, S. (2003). Effective writing instruction across the grades: What every educational consultant should know. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14, 75-89.spa
dc.relation.referencesTracy, B., Reid, R., & Graham, S. (2009). Teaching young students strategies for planning and drafting stories: The impact of self-regulated strategy development. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 323-332.spa
dc.relation.referencesThe University of Leeds. (2020). Academic writing. https://library.leeds.ac.uk/info/14011/writing/106/academic_writing (Accessed April, 5th 2021).spa
dc.relation.referencesE2Language. (2020). IELTS Writing Task 2: The 3 Sentence Introduction. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOxP7dy6BJQ&list=PLdawRnR9ilZB8cHazE Y1yaGptceBnY9Ht&index=2 (Accessed October, 28th 2020).spa
dc.relation.referencesEl Tiempo newspaper. (2021). Pruebas PISA Colombia tendria importante retroceso por la pandemia. https://www.eltiempo.com/vida/educacion/pruebas-pisa-colombia-tendria-importanteretroceso-por-la-pandemia-605438 (Retrieved August,24 2021)spa
dc.relation.referencesPortfolio magazine. (2021). Colombia con la peor nota de la OCDE en pruebas PISA. https://www.portafolio.co/economia/colombia-con-la-peor-nota-de-la-ocde-en-pruebas-pisa536148 (Retrieved August 24, 2021)spa
dc.relation.referencesLiteracy505/Writer's Workshop (2016). https://sites.google.com/site/literacy505/writingworkshop (Retrieved August 31st, 2021)spa
dc.relation.referencesLiteracy505/Writer's Workshop (2016). https://sites.google.com/site/literacy505/writingworkshop (Retrieved August 31st, 2021)spa
dc.relation.referencesScienceDirect. (2021). Digital repository. Journal and books. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/digital-repository.spa
dc.relation.referencesChildren’s Literacy Initiative. (2016). Writing workshop - Planning instruction. https://learn.cli.org/best-practices/writing-workshop/instruction.spa
dc.relation.referencesCambridge University Press & Assessment. (2021). What can Cambridge International and the British Council offer your school?. https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/about-us/cambridgeinternational-british-council/.spa
dc.relation.referencesASPAEN. Digital library. (2021). https://digitallibrary.aspaen.edu.co/spa
dc.relation.referencesSAGE Publications (2021 ). https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/curriculumstudies/n471.xmlspa
dc.relation.references“Consent to participate”. Ethical Considerations. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1MpZDOamovxqWfNidaSU1K5AbwMaewpkwFVhp7F4PUX 8/editspa
dc.relation.referenceshttps://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/pearson/default.aspxspa
dc.relation.referenceshttps://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/spearman/default.aspxspa
dc.relation.referenceshttps://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/ttestdependent/default.aspxspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.subject.proposalAcademic writingeng
dc.subject.proposalWriting Workshop Instructional Modeleng
dc.subject.proposalWriting confidenceeng
dc.subject.proposalEscritura académicaspa
dc.subject.proposalModelo de instrucción del taller de escrituraspa
dc.subject.proposalConfianza al escribirspa
dc.subject.unescoDidáctica
dc.subject.unescoRedacción técnica
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Didáctica del Inglés - Manizalesspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés - Manizalesspa
dc.description.researchgroupEnglish Didacticsspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem