Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorGonzalez-Correa, Clara Helena
dc.contributor.authorVillada Gómez, Johan Sebastián
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-07T15:29:58Z
dc.date.available2021-07-07T15:29:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-15
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/16857
dc.descriptionIlustraciónspa
dc.description.abstractspa: Antecedentes y objetivos: El ángulo de fase (AF) se mide directamente por bioimpedancia eléctrica (BIE). Algunos estudios han encontrado asociación con parámetros nutricionales, fuerza y masa muscular, proponiéndose como marcador diagnóstico para sarcopenia. El objetivo fue proponer puntos de corte de AF para diagnóstico de sarcopenia en ancianos de Manizales. Métodos: Se utilizaron mediciones de AF tomadas mediante BIE y se estableció el nivel de correlación con fuerza de agarre (FA) e índice de masa muscular esquelética (IMME) en ancianos funcionales. Se propusieron puntos de corte de AF con base en los datos de esta población y se establece sensibilidad y sarcopenia para el diagnóstico con base en los criterios de sarcopenia del consenso europeo de 2019. Resultados: Se analizaron 255 ancianos funcionales, en hombres el AF tuvo una correlación directa con el IMME (p = 0,010) y FA (p = 0,038). En mujeres, el AF tuvo correlación directa con IMME (p = 0,003) y FA (p = 0,019). La correlación entre AF e IMME y FA fue bajo (r= 0,252 y 0,206, respectivamente). En mujeres la correlación entre AF e IMME fue bajo (r = 0,237) y muy bajo para FA (r= 0,190). Al comparar los resultados de sensibilidad y especificidad de los puntos de corte encontrados, se encontró que los diferentes puntos de corte de AF tienen pobre rendimiento para el diagnóstico de sarcopenia debido a una baja sensibilidad en la población general y en mujeres, siendo el valor del Tercil 1 en hombres (6,12 °) un punto de corte que podría tener alguna utilidad. Conclusiones: existe controversia respecto a la utilidad del AF como criterio diagnóstico de sarcopenia. En hombres un punto de corte de 6,12° podría sugerirse como un punto de corte para sarcopenia, sin embargo, en mujeres su rendimiento diagnóstico no fue adecuado para establecer un punto de corte.spa
dc.description.abstracteng: Background and objectives: The phase angle (AF) is directly measured by electrical bioimpedance (EIB). Some studies have found an association with nutritional parameters, strength and muscle mass, proposing it as a diagnostic marker for sarcopenia. The objective was to propose FA cut-off points for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in the elderly in Manizales. Methods: PA measurements taken by EIB were used and the level of correlation with grip strength (FA) and skeletal muscle mass index (IMME) was established in functional elderly. PA cut-off points were proposed based on the data from this population and sensitivity and sarcopenia were established for the diagnosis based on the sarcopenia criteria of the 2019 European consensus. Results: 255 functional elderly were analyzed, in men the PA had a direct correlation with the IMME (p = 0.010) and FA (p = 0.038). In women, PA had a direct correlation with IMME (p = 0.003) and AF (p = 0.019). The correlation between FA and IMME and FA was low (r = 0.252 and 0.206, respectively). In women, the correlation between FA and IMME was low (r = 0.237) and very low for FA (r = 0.190). When comparing the results of sensitivity and specificity of the cut-off points found, it was found that the different FA cut-off points have poor performance for the diagnosis of sarcopenia due to a low sensitivity in the general population and in women, the value being Tertile 1 in men (6.12 °) a cut-off point that could be of some use. Conclusions: there is controversy regarding the usefulness of FA as a diagnostic criterion for sarcopenia. In men, a cut-off point of 6.12 ° could be suggested as a cut-off point for sarcopenia, however, in women its diagnostic performance was not adequate to establish a cut-off point.eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsIntroducción / Planteamiento del problema y justificación / Metodología / Resultados y Discusión / Conclusiones y recomendaciones / Anexos / Referencias bibliográficasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.titlePuntos de corte de ángulo de fase para diagnóstico de sarcopenia en ancianos de Manizales, Caldas, Colombiaspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeInforme de investigaciónspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Especializaciónspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad de Caldasspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio institucional Universidad de Caldasspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.cospa
dc.publisher.placeManizalesspa
dc.relation.referencesCruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:16–31spa
dc.relation.referencesVillada-Gómez JS, González-Correa CH, Marulanda-Mejía F. Puntos de corte provisionales para el diagnóstico de sarcopenia en ancianos de Caldas, Colombia. Biomedica. 2018;38(4):521–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesJanssen I, Heymsfield SB, Baumgartner RN, Ross R. Estimation of skeletal muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89(2):465–71.spa
dc.relation.referencesKilic MK, Kizilarslanoglu MC, Arik G, Bolayir B, Kara O, Dogan Varan H, et al. Association of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis-Derived Phase Angle and Sarcopenia in Older Adults. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017;32(1):103–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesYamada M, Kimura Y, Ishiyama D, Nishio N, Otobe Y, Tanaka T, et al. Phase Angle is a Useful indicator for Muscle Function in Older Adults. J Nutr Heal Aging. 2019;23(3):251–5.spa
dc.relation.referencesBasile C, Della-Morte D, Cacciatore F, Gargiulo G, Galizia G, Roselli M, et al. Phase angle as bioelectrical marker to identify elderly patients at risk of sarcopenia. Exp Gerontol. 2014;58:43–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesTomeleri CM, Cavalcante EF, Antunes M, Nabuco HCG, De Souza MF, Teixeira DC, et al. Phase Angle Is Moderately Associated With Muscle Quality and Functional Capacity, Independent of Age and Body Composition in Older Women. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019;42(4):281–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesMundstock E, Azambuja Amaral M, Baptista RR, Sarria EE, Rosaria Grecco dos Santos R, Detoni Filho A, et al. Meta-analyses Association between phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis and level of physical activity: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2019;38:1504–10.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzalez MC, Barbosa-Silva TG, Bielemann RM, Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB. Phase angle and its determinants in healthy subjects: Influence of body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(3):712–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesZanforlini BM, Trevisan C, Bertocco A, Piovesan F, Dianin M, Mazzochin M, et al. Phase angle and metabolic equivalents as predictors of frailty transitions in advanced age. Exp Gerontol. 2019;122:47–52.spa
dc.relation.referencesUemura K, Yamada M, Okamoto H. Association of bioimpedance phase angle and prospective falls in older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019;19(6):503–7.spa
dc.relation.referencesUemura K, Doi T, Tsutsumimoto K, Nakakubo S, Kim M, Kurita S, et al. Predictivity of bioimpedance phase angle for incident disability in older adults. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019 Aug 22;spa
dc.relation.referencesPagotto V, Silveira EA. Applicability and agreement of different diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia estimation in the elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;59:288–94spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález-Correa CH, Pineda-Zuluaga MC, Sepúlveda-Gallego LE. Analysis of Electrical Bioimpedance for the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia and Estimation of Its Prevalence. In: Berteme-Filho P, editor. ICEBI 2019, IFMBE. Springer Nature Singapore; 2020. p. 84– 91.spa
dc.relation.referencesSocial M de S y P. Análisis de Situación de Salud (ASIS) Colombia, 2019. Dirección de Epidemiología y Demografía. 2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesCurcio-Borrero CL, Gómez-Montes JF, Osorio-García D. Lineamientos de la política pública de envejecimiento y vejez. Departamento de Caldas 2018 - 2028. Manizales; 2018. 1–182 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesComunicaciones G De, Restrepo AL. Plan Decenal de Salud Pública. 2013;(32):2012–21spa
dc.relation.referencesBosy-Westphal A, Plachta-Danielzik S, Müller MJ. Phase Angle From Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis: Population Reference Values by Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2006;30(4):309–16.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuchnia AJ, Teigen LM, Cole AJ, Mulasi U, Gonzalez MC, Heymsfield SB, et al. Phase Angle and Impedance Ratio: Reference Cut-Points From the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004 From Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Data. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2017;41(8):1310–5.spa
dc.relation.referencesYamada Y, Buehring B, Krueger D, Anderson RM, Schoeller DA, Binkley N. Electrical Properties Assessed by Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy as Biomarkers of Age-related Loss of Skeletal Muscle Quantity and Quality. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72(9):1180–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Rodríguez F, Cristi-Montero C, González-Ruíz K, Correa-Bautista JE, Ramírez-Vélez R. Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis and muscular fitness in healthy men. Nutrients. 2016;8(7):1–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesKyle UG, Soundar EP, Genton L, Pichard C. Can phase angle determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis assess nutritional risk? A comparison between healthy and hospitalized subjects. Clin Nutr. 2012;21:875–81.spa
dc.relation.referencesTanaka S, Ando K, Kobayashi K, Seki T, Hamada T, MacHino M, et al. Low Bioelectrical Impedance Phase Angle Is a Significant Risk Factor for Frailty. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesPessoa DF, Flávia ·, De Branco MS, Dos Reis AS, Limirio LS, Lorena ·, et al. Association of phase angle with sarcopenia and its components in physically active older women. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;spa
dc.relation.referencesSantana N de M, Pinho CPS, da Silva CP, dos Santos NF, Mendes RML. Phase Angle as a Sarcopenia Marker in Hospitalized Elderly Patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 2018;33(2):232–7spa
dc.relation.referencesLalkhen AG, McCluskey A. Clinical tests: Sensitivity and specificity. Contin Educ Anaesthesia, Crit Care Pain. 2008;8(6):221–3.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.subject.proposalSarcopeniaspa
dc.subject.proposalImpedancia eléctricaspa
dc.subject.proposalÁngulo de Fasespa
dc.subject.proposalComposición corporalspa
dc.subject.proposalAncianosspa
dc.subject.proposalValores de referenciaspa
dc.subject.unescoCiencias médicas
dc.subject.unescoPatología
dc.subject.unescoVejez
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18wsspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem