Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Modelling entrepreneurship ecosystems as a design process: Manizales Más case study
dc.contributor.advisor | Maya Castaño, Jorge Hernán | |
dc.contributor.author | Molina Osorio, Viviana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-09T22:22:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2032-08-01 | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-09T22:22:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-08-08 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/17905 | |
dc.description | Ilustraciones, gráficas | spa |
dc.description.abstract | spa:El modelar ecosistemas de emprendimiento hasta ahora había sido tarea de economistas para justificar con datos de ventas y generación de empleo el posible impacto que tiene este tipo de intervención para el desarrollo económico. Desde el inicio hubo preguntas acerca de si hay otra forma de medir un ecosistema, de conocerlo y visualizar otros posibles impactos más allá del económico. Fue allí donde recurrimos al diseño como disciplina integradora para buscar nuevas formas de modelar y de ser posible diseñar ecosistemas de emprendimiento, entendiendo que allí se mueve algo más que solo dinero. Escogimos el estudio de caso como método descriptivo exploratorio para tener la posibilidad de movernos entre una gran cantidad de información recolectada, un método que nos permitiera dar cuenta de la complejidad del objeto de estudio y que también tuviera la suficiente flexibilidad de abrir campo a otros métodos que se requirieran para ahondar en la exploración del ecosistema Manizales Más. La contribución final de esta tesis es la modelación a través de diferentes métodos del mismo ecosistema, lo que nos permite ver diferentes elementos y comprender mejor como se relacionan los agentes, qué hay en las dimensiones y cuáles podrían ser otras formas de medirlos. Al final no se propone un único método para modelar ecosistemas, más bien se propone una metáfora que permita una reflexión a los posibles agentes interesados en fomentar su ecosistema de emprendimiento acerca de cada uno de los elementos que debe tener en cuenta y del papel que tiene el diseñador en ese proceso, de esta forma la metáfora del jardinero busca ampliar la metáfora biológica ya existente aclarando cada dimensión y el papel crucial del jardinero en la misma. | spa |
dc.description.abstract | eng:Up until now, modeling entrepreneurship ecosystems had been the task of economists to justify with sales data and job creation the possible impact that this type of intervention has for economic development. From the beginning, there were questions about whether there is another way to measure an ecosystem, to model it, and to visualize other possible impacts beyond the economic one, and it was there that we turned to design as an integrative discipline to seek new ways to model and, if possible, design ecosystems of entrepreneurship, understanding that something more than just money moves in there. We chose the case study as an exploratory descriptive method to have the possibility of moving between a large amount of information collected, a method that would allow us to account for the complexity of the study object and that also had enough flexibility to open the field to other methods that were required to delve into the exploration of the Manizales Más ecosystem. The final contribution of this thesis is modeling through different methods the same ecosystem, which allows us to see different elements and better understand how the agents are related, what is in the dimensions and what could be other ways of measuring them. In the end, a single method is not proposed to model ecosystems but rather a metaphor is proposed, that allows a reflection to the possible stakeholders interested in promoting their entrepreneurial ecosystem about each of the elements that must be taken into consideration and the role that plays the designer in this process. In this way, the proposition of the metaphor of a gardener seeks to expand the already existing biological metaphor by clarifying each dimension and the crucial role of the gardener in it. | eng |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Modelling entrepreneurship ecosystems as a design process: Manizales Más case study / Acknowledgement / Resumen / Abstract / Content Table / List of Figures / List of Tables / Publications List / INTRODUCTION / Document structure / 1. Successful entrepreneurship ecosystems for regional development: a proposal for their modelling and creation / Introduction / 1.1. Three problems in developing entrepreneurship ecosystems: levels-definition, agentdomain relations, and their creation / 1.2. What is Manizales Más? / 1.3. Literature Review / 1.4. Research Methods Proposal / 1.5. Complex Adaptive Systems: Conceptual Elements to Model an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem / 1.6. Ecosystemic Approach to Understand the Network Flows / 1.7. Systemic Design as a Possible Framework to Design Entrepreneurial Ecosystems / 1.8. Concluding Remarks / 1.9. References / 2. Research Project / 2.1. Project Rationale / 2.1.1. Studying Entrepreneurship Ecosystems from a Design Standpoint / 2.1.2 Why to Choose the Knowledge Management Research Line of Design and Creation PhD / 2.2. Research Questions / 2.3. Research Goals / 2.3.1. Main Goal / 2.3.2. Specific Goals / 2.4. Why did We Choose Manizales Más as our Study Case? / 2.5. Research Strategy / 2.6. Research Process Over the PhD Duration / 2.6.1. First Year 2015-2016 / 2.6.2. Second Year 2017 / 2.6.3. Third Year 2018 / 2.6.4. Fourth Year 2019-2020 / 2.6.5. Fifth Year 2020 – 2021 / 2.7. References / 3. Methodology: A Mix of Methods to Understand Entrepreneurship Ecosystems / 3.1. Case Study / 3.1.1. Case Study Protocol / 3.2. Literature Review and Thematic Analysis / 3.3. Document Analysis and Participant observation / 3.4. Modelling / 3.5. Results, Analysis and Discussion / 3.6. References / 4. Theoretical Framework / 4.1. The Common Playfield Among Creativity, Design, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. Results from a Thematic Analysis / 4.1.1. Methodology / 4.1.2. Results / 4.1.3. Conclusions / 4.2. Designing Entrepreneurship Ecosystems / 4.2.1. Framing Entrepreneurship Evolution / 4.2.2. The Different Design Orders / 4.2.3. The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem as a Fourth Order Artifact / 4.3. Conclusions / 4.4. References: / 5. Manizales Más in Depth / 5.1. Manizales Más Creation and Evolution / 5.2. Manizales Más Organizational Structure / 11 5.3. anizales Más Program Description / 5.3.1. EAP Empresas de Alto Potencial / 5.3.2. Mentoría Empresarial / 5.3.3. Affiliates / 5.3.4. PAP: Profesores de Alto Potencial / 5.3.5. Addventure Más / 5.3.6. Startup Más / 5.3.7. Ruta del Emprendimiento / 5.3.8. Vender Más / 5.3.9. Crecer Más / 5.3.10. Growth Team / 5.3.11. Other programs / 5.4. Previous Manizales Más models / 5.4.1. Systematization Universidad de Manizales / 5.4.2. Process Map / 5.5. Conclusions / 5.6. References / 6. Contribution: a proposal of entrepreneurial ecosystem design-based models based on Manizales Más / 6.1. Agent Based Modelling / 6.1.1. Introduction / 6.1.2. Objective / 6.1.3. Methodology / 6.1.4. Results / 6.1.5. Conclusions / 6.2. Mapping Creativity and Design within the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem / 6.2.1. Introduction / 6.2.2. Objectives / 6.2.3. Theoretical Framework / 6.2.4. Instruments and Methods / 6.2.5. Findings / 6.2.6. Discussion / 6.2.7. Implications / 6.2.8. Conclusions / 6.3. Manizales Más Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Analysis of Value Relationships / 6.3.1. Introduction / 6.3.2. Objective: / 6.3.3. Theoretical Background: Value flow model / 6.3.4. Design technique and information gathering instruments / 6.3.5. Results &Analysis / 6.3.6. Conclusions / 6.4. Manizales Más Nested Design Levels Model / 6.4.1. Introduction / 6.4.2. Objective / 6.4.3. Reymen’s modelling Methodology / 6.4.4. Structured analysis and design technique / 6.4.5. Modelling process / 6.4.6. Results / 6.4.7. Discussion of results / 6.4.8. Design Orders, An exploration in Manizales Más / 6.5. Conclusions / 6.6. References / 7. Entrepreneurship Ecosystems: The Gardener Metaphor / 7.1. What is a garden made of? / 7.1.1. Plants - Markets / 7.1.2. Soil / Substrate – Culture / 7.1.3. Pollinators - Human Capital / 7.1.4. Fertilizers - Public Policy / 7.1.5. Seedbed / greenhouse - Support entities / 7.1.6. Water – Finance / 7.1.7. Gardening tools – Administration / 7.1.8. Migrating animals - External relations / 7.2. Who is the Gardener? / 7.2.1. The Gardener that just spreads the seed around / 7.2.2. The gardener working for curbside appeal / 7.2.3.The gardener that dreams with a topiary / 13 7.2.4. The Versailles gardener / 7.3. What about the weeds? / 7.4. The gardener metaphor turning into the tale of a gardener / 7.5. Conclusions About the Interactions, Blossoming and Withering / 7.6. References / 8. Discussion / 8.1 How did we reach each objective? / 8.2 key findings and rationale in choosing each modeling method / 8.3 concluding summary / 8.4 Limitations / 8.5 Future work / 9. Conclusions / 10. Full Bibliography / 11. Appendix / Appendix 1. Documents Included on Thematic Analysis / Appendix 2. List of Manizales Más files. | eng |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | spa |
dc.language.iso | eng | spa |
dc.language.iso | spa | spa |
dc.title | Modelling entrepreneurship ecosystems as a design process: Manizales Más case study | eng |
dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Doctorado | spa |
dc.contributor.researchgroup | DICOVI: Diseño y Cognición en Entornos Visuales y Virtuales (Categoría A1) | spa |
dc.description.degreelevel | Doctorado | spa |
dc.identifier.instname | Universidad de Caldas | spa |
dc.identifier.reponame | Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Caldas | spa |
dc.identifier.repourl | https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co | spa |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Artes y Humanidades | spa |
dc.publisher.place | Manizales | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Calderon Hernandez, G., Naranjo Valencia, J., Alvarez Giraldo, C. and Trujillo Henao, L. (2016). Manizales Más: Modelo de emprendimiento para el desarrollo de la ciudad, sistematización de la experiencia. Universidad de Manizales. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Gonzalez de Londoño, A. (2014). Teoría y Casos de Innovación social. Caracterización de Manizales Más una experiencia de Emprendimiento de Alto Impacto en Colombia. Maestría en Creatividad e innovación en las organizaciones. Universidad Autónoma de Manizales. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Impulso Colombia (2018) Sistematización de Manizales Más: Mapa de Procesos, Caracterización y documentos. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Isenberg, D. J. (2010). The Big Idea: How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina, V. Florez, L. Londoño, J. García, G. Ospina, O. (2018). Innovative teachers focused on entrepreneurship, a peek to “Profesores de Alto Potencial” program. Innovation and entrepreneurship teaching excellence award 2018, 101-118 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina, V. Vasquez, P (2017). "Ruta del Emprendimiento" A joint effort to have strong entrepreneurs. Innovation & Entrepreneurship Teaching Excellence Awards 2017 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Manizales Más Scalerator Handbook 2013 | spa |
dc.relation.references | OKA Consultores (2019) - Informe de resultados toma de datos relaciones de valor entre los agentes del ecosistema de Emprendimiento Manizales Más | spa |
dc.relation.references | Manizales Más Rio de Janeiro Presentation | spa |
dc.relation.references | Manizales Más 2020 Presentation | spa |
dc.relation.references | Manizales Más 150708 BM DNP Presentation | spa |
dc.relation.references | Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social Influences on Creativity: The Effects of Contracted-for Reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.50.1.14 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Amabile, T. M. (1993). What does a theory of creativity require?. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 179-181. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Amabile, T. M. & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 46(12), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Brännback M., Carsrud A. (2009) Cognitive Maps in Entrepreneurship: Researching Sense Making and Action. In: Carsrud A., Brännback M. (eds) Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 24. Springer, New York, NY | spa |
dc.relation.references | Brown, T. & Kātz, B. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Collins | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bruns, K., Bosma, N., Sanders, M. & Schramm, M. (2017). Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a regional cross-section growth regression approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 31-54. Springer | spa |
dc.relation.references | Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Carroll G.R., Khessina O.M. (2005) The Ecology of Entrepreneurship. In: Alvarez S.A., Agarwal R., Sorenson O. (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA | spa |
dc.relation.references | Cameron, B. G., Crawley, E. F., Loureiro, G. & Rebentisch, E. S. (2008). Value flow mapping: Using networks to inform stakeholder analysis. Acta Astronautica, 62(4), 324-333. Elsevier | spa |
dc.relation.references | Collins, P. K. (2015). Building a local design and entrepreneurship ecosystem. Procedia Technology, 20, 258-262. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Cortés, E., & Cruz, A. (2015). Generative Design as Tool for Social Innovation : A Methodological Approach. In Back to the Future [icdhs 10th + 1 Conference] Proceedings Book (pp. 44-48). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Cross, N. (2011). Designerly ways of knowing. Bloomsbury London | spa |
dc.relation.references | Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The systems model of creativity: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer, New York, NY | spa |
dc.relation.references | Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creatividad. El fluir y la psicología del descubrimiento y la invención. (J. P. Tosaus, Trans.). Barcelona. Buenos Aires. México: Paidos. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Den Ouden, E. (2011). Innovation design: Creating value for people, organizations and society. Springer Science & Business Media, London. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Dimov, D. (2016). Toward a design science of entrepreneurship. In Jerome A. Katz, Andrew C. Corbett (ed.) Models of start-up thinking and action: Theoretical, empirical and pedagogical approaches (pp. 1-31). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Dino, R. N. (2015). Crossing boundaries: Toward integrating creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship research through practice. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 139. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Ehrentreich, N. (2007). Agent-based modeling: The Santa Fe Institute artificial stock market model revisited. Springer Science & Business Media. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Fallman, D. (2008). The Interaction Design Research Triangle of Design Practice, Design Studies, and Design Exploration. Design Issues, 24(3), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.3.4 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hanrahan, P., 2006. Vizql: a language for query, analysis and visualization. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. pp. 721-721. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hausmann, R. (2008). High Bandwidth Development Policy. RWP08-060. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Isenberg, D. (2014). What an entrepreneurship ecosystem actually is. Harvard Business Review, 5. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Isenberg, D. J. (2010). The Big Idea: How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Isenberg, D. (2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Babson Global. http://www.innovationamerica.us/images/stories/2011/The-entrepreneurshipecosystem-strategy-for-economic-growth-policy-20110620183915.pdf | spa |
dc.relation.references | Isenberg, D. & Onyemah, V. (2016). Fostering Scale Up Ecosystems for Regional Economic Growth. In Global Entrepreneurship Congress (pp. 71-97). Global Entrepreneurship Research Network. http://genglobal.org/sites/default/files/INNOVATIONS_GEC-2016.pdf | spa |
dc.relation.references | Jones, P. (2014a). Design Research Methods in Systemic Design. Institute for 21st Century Agoras, 2014. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Jones, P. H. (2014b). Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems. In G. S. Metcalf (Ed.), Social Systems and Design (pp. 91-128). Springer. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Jones, P. (2014c). Relating Systems Thinking and Design II. Theoretical Evolution in Systemic Design. FORMakademisk-research journal for design and design education, 7(4). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Paris: Final Report to OECD http://lib.davender.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/03 /Entrepreneurial-ecosystems-OECD.pdf. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Manzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. (K. Friedman & E. Stolterman, Eds.). Massachusetts: MIT Press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina Osorio, V. (2017). The Mutualism Relation within the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. In International Symposium on Electronic Art 2017: Bio-Creation & Peace. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina, V., & Valbuena, W. (2019). Mapping Creativity and Design within the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem. Kindai management review, 7, 39-53. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina Osorio, V. & Echeverri Gallego, F. (2019). Fundamentación del proceso formativo de empresas de alto potencial Manizales Más 2016. Universidad Autónoma de Manizales. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina Osorio, V. & Flórez Loaiza, L. M. (2018). Informe Final - Descripción de la experiencia de los empresarios de alto potencial, mediante la escritura de casos de enseñanza para el emprendimiento como herramienta en el aula de clase de los profesores de alto potencial de Manizales Más. Universidad Autónoma de Manizales. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina Osorio, V., Londoño, J., Ospina, O., García, G., & Flórez Loaiza, L. (2018). Innovative Teachers Focused on Entrepreneurship, a Peek to “Profesores de Alto Potencial” program. In D. D. Remenyi (Ed.). 4th Teaching Innovation & Entrepreneurship Excellence Awards 2018. An Anthology of Case Histories (pp. 101-118). Acpi. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina, V., & Valbuena, W. (2019). Mapping Creativity and Design within the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem. Kindai management review, 7, 39-53. Max-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological economics, 53(1), 5- 16. | spa |
dc.relation.references | OKA Consultores (2019) - Informe de resultados toma de datos relaciones de valor entre los agentes del ecosistema de Emprendimiento Manizales Más | spa |
dc.relation.references | Quintana, M., Vargas, S., & Valbuena, W. S. (2017). La creatividad en el diseño: componentes sistémicos ¿Más codiseño, menos enseñanza? Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 29(3), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.5209/ARIS.55261 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Reymen, I. (2001). Improving design processes through structured reflection: A domainindependent approach (Vol. 31). Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts Publication, 4(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2016). Convivial toolbox. Generative research for the front end of design. Ohio: BIS Publisher. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sawyer, R. K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sawyer, K. R. (2006). Explaining Creativity - The Science if Human Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-1750(88)90050-4 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Scott, J. & Carrington, P. J. (2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Sage. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development (translation of second German edition by Redvers Opie). Cambridge, MA, Harvard University. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sevaldson, B. (2010). Discussions & Movements in Design Research. A Systems Approach to Practice Research in Design. Form Akademisk, 3(1), 8-35. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Simonton, D. K. (2012). Fields, domains, and individuals. In M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 67-86). Davis, California: Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00004-5 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Strauss, A. y Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la Teoría Fundamentada. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Vol. 8). New York: Cambridge University Press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Wenger, E. (2001). Comunidades de práctica: aprendizaje, significado e identidad. Barcelona, Buenos Aires, México: Paidós. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Den Ouden, E. (2011). Innovation design: Creating value for people, organizations and society. Springer Science & Business Media | spa |
dc.relation.references | Pilinkienė, V. & Mačiulis, P. (2014). Comparison of Different Ecosystem Analogies: The Main Economic Determinants and Levels of Impact. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 365-370. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Harvard University Press | spa |
dc.relation.references | Alexander, C. (2002). The Nature of Order: An Essay on the Art of Building and the nature of the universe. Taylor & Francis | spa |
dc.relation.references | Alexiou, K., Johnson, J., & Zamenopoulos, T. (2009). Embracing Complexity in Design. Routledge. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Amabile, T. M. (1993). What does a theory of creativity require?. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 179-181. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Amabile, T. M. & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 46(12), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social Influences on Creativity: The Effects of Contracted-for Reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.50.1.14 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Anggraeni, E., Den Hartigh, E., & Zegveld, M. (2007). Business Ecosystem as a Perspective for Studying the Relations Between Firms and Their Business Networks. In ECCON 2007 Annual Meeting (pp. 1-21). Eburon Academic Publishers. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Archer, B. (1981). A View of the Nature of Design Research. Design: Science: Method, 30- 47. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Archer, B. (2007). A View of the Nature of Design Research. Royal College of Art. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Ariza, N. & Maya, J. (2014). Proposal To Identify the Essential Elements To Construct Construct a User Experience Model With the Product Using the Thematic Analysis Technique. Proceedings of the 13th International Design Conference DESIGN 2014, 11-22. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs. (2013). Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Diagnostic Toolkit . | spa |
dc.relation.references | Banathy, B. H. (2013). Designing Social Systems in a Changing World. Springer Science - Business Media. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Beckman, S. L. & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking. California Management Review, 50(1), 25-56. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Board of IJDCI, E. (2013). Perspectives on design creativity and innovation research. Taylor \& Francis. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Boden, M. (1992). The Creative Mind, Abacus, London | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bohemia, E., Liedtka, J., & Rieple, A. (2012). Leading Innovation Through Design: Proceedings of the DMI 2012 International Research Conference. Design Management Institute and Authors. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Brännback M., Carsrud A. (2009) Cognitive Maps in Entrepreneurship: Researching Sense Making and Action. In: Carsrud A., Brännback M. (eds) Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 24. Springer, New York, NY | spa |
dc.relation.references | Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Braunerhjelm, P. (2010). Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth-past Experience, Current Knowledge and Policy Implications. CESIS, KTH Royal Institute of Technology. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Brown, T. & Kātz, B. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Collins | spa |
dc.relation.references | Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bruns, K., Bosma, N., Sanders, M. & Schramm, M. (2017). Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a regional cross-section growth regression approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 31-54. Springer. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Brush, C. G., Duhaime, I. M., Gartner, W. B., Stewart, A., Katz, J. A., Hitt, M. A, Venkataraman, S. (2003). Doctoral education in the field of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Buchanan, R. (1985). Declaration by Design: Rhetoric, Argument, and Demonstration in design practice. Design Issues, 2(1), 4-22. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Buchanan, R. (1998). Design in Contemporary Culture. Design Issues, 14(1), 3-20. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design issues, 17(4), 3-23. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Buchanan, R. (2019). Systems Thinking and Design Thinking: The Search for Principles in the World We Are Making. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(2), 85-104. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bull, I. & Willard, G. E. (1993). Towards a Theory of Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 183-195. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Calderon Hernandez, G., Naranjo Valencia, J., Alvarez Giraldo, C. and Trujillo Henao, L. (2016). Manizales Más: Modelo de emprendimiento para el desarrollo de la ciudad, sistematización de la experiencia. Universidad de Manizales. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Cameron, B. G., Crawley, E. F., Loureiro, G. & Rebentisch, E. S. (2008). Value flow mapping: Using networks to inform stakeholder analysis. Acta Astronautica, 62(4), 324-333. Elsevier. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Carayannis, E. G. (2013). Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. Springer. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Carroll G.R., Khessina O.M. (2005) The Ecology of Entrepreneurship. In: Alvarez S.A., Agarwal R., Sorenson O. (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA | spa |
dc.relation.references | Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley | spa |
dc.relation.references | Collins, P. K. (2015). Building a Local Design and Entrepreneurship Ecosystem. Procedia Technology, 20, 258-262. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Cortés, E., & Cruz, A. (2015). Generative Design as Tool for Social Innovation : A Methodological Approach. In Back to the Future [icdhs 10th + 1 Conference] Proceedings Book (pp. 44-48). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Cross, N. (1982). Designerly Ways of Knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221-227. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Cross, N. (Ed.). (1984). Design Methodology. Wiley. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creatividad. El fluir y la psicología del descubrimiento y la invención. (J. P. Tosaus, Trans.). Barcelona. Buenos Aires. México: Paidos. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and Creativity. Namta Journal, 22(2), 60-97. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The systems model of creativity: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer, New York, NY | spa |
dc.relation.references | Darzentas, J. & Darzentas, J. S. (2014). Systems Thinking in Design: Service Design and Self-Services. Form Akademisk - Research Journal for Design and Design Education, 7(4). | spa |
dc.relation.references | De Laplante, K., 2005. IS ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT A POSTMODERN SCIENCE? Ecological paradigms lost: Routes of theory change, 2, p.397. | spa |
dc.relation.references | De Solla, D. J. (1986). Little Science, Big Science... and Beyond. Columbia University Press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Den Ouden, E. (2011). Innovation design: Creating value for people, organizations and society. Springer Science & Business Media. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Dimov, D. (2016). Toward a design science of entrepreneurship. In Jerome A. Katz, Andrew C. Corbett (ed.) Models of start-up thinking and action: Theoretical, empirical and pedagogical approaches (pp. 1-31). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Dino, R. N. (2015). Crossing boundaries: Toward Integrating creativity, innovation, and Entrepreneurship Research Through Practice. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 139-145. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Dorst, K. (2008). Design research: a revolution-waiting-to-happen. Design Studies, 29(1), 4-11. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Dorst, K. (2011). The Core of “Design Thinking” and its Application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521-532. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Drucker, P. F. (1986). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. Harper & Row. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Drucker, P.F. (1985).Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Harper & Row Publishers | spa |
dc.relation.references | Dubberly, H. (2008). Design in The Age of Biology: Shifting From a Mechanical-Object Ethos to an Organic-Systems Ethos. Dubberly Design Office. http://www.dubberly.com/articles/design-in-the-age-of-biology.html | spa |
dc.relation.references | Ehrentreich, N. (2007). Agent-based modeling: The Santa Fe Institute artificial stock market model revisited. Springer Science & Business Media. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Elia, G., Li, X., Margherita, A. & Petti, C. (2017). Human-oriented Corporate Entrepreneurship: an Integrative framework of Creativity and HRM Enablers. European Business Review, 29(4). Emerald Publishing Limited. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Evbuomwan, N., Sivaloganathan, S. & Jebb, A. (1996). A survey of design philosophies, models, methods and systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 210(4), 301-320. Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Fagerberg, J. (2004). Innovation: a guide to the literature. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Fallman, D. (2008). The Interaction Design Research Triangle of Design Practice, Design Studies, and Design Exploration. Design Issues, 24(3), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.3.4 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Fereday, J. & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2008). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Fiet, J. O., Norton, W. I., & Clouse, V. G. H. (2013). Search and discovery by repeatedly successful entrepreneurs. International Small Business Journal, 31(November 2012), 890-913. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Fillis, I. & Rentschler, R. (2010). The role of creativity in entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 18(01), 49-81. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Ford, D.V. and Harris, J.J. (1992). “The elusive definition of creativity”, Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 186-198. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Gartner, W. B. (1988). “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. American journal of small business, 12(4), 11-32. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Gharajedaghi, J. (2011). Socio-cultural Systems. Ackoff Center Weblog. http://ackoffcenter.blogs.com/ackoff_center_weblog/2013/05/socio-culturalsystems.html | spa |
dc.relation.references | Guilford, J.P (1950), “Creativity”, American Psychologist, Vol. 5, p444 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Goldsby, M. G., & Nelson, T. E. (2012). Entrepreneurship Design: A Design Based Theory of Entrepreneurship - ProQuest. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 23(No. 2). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Gonzalez de Londoño, A. (2014). Teoría y Casos de Innovación social. Caracterización de Manizales Más una experiencia de Emprendimiento de Alto Impacto en Colombia. Maestría en Creatividad e innovación en las organizaciones. Universidad Autónoma de Manizales. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Graham, K. (2014). TechMatters: “Qiqqa” than you can say Reference Management: A Tool to Organize the Research Process. LOEX Quarterly, 40, 4-6. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hanrahan, P., 2006. Vizql: a language for query, analysis and visualization. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. pp. 721-721. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P. & Weil, B. (2008). Studying creative design: the contribution of CK theory. NSF International Workshop on Studying Design Creativity (Vol. 8). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hausmann, R. (2008). High Bandwidth Development Policy. RWP08-060 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hawken, P., Lovins, A. B., & Lovins, L. H. (2013). Natural Capitalism: The Next Industrial Revolution. Routledge. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hekkert, M. P. (2012). Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Science and public policy, 39(1), 74-87. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Henderson, A. (2003). Design for Evolution. Presentation at HITS Conference, IIT/ID Chicago, United States. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Basic Books. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Holland, J. H. (2006). Studying Complex Adaptive Systems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 19(1), 1-8. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Horváth, I. (2007). Comparison of three methodological approaches of design research. In DS 42: Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, Paris, France, 28.-31.07. 2007 (pp. 361-362). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hunter, S.T., Bedell, K.E. and Mumford, M.D. (2007). “Climate for creativity: a quantitative review”, Creativity Research Journal, Vol.19, No.1, pp.69-90. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Iba, T. (2010). An autopoietic systems theory for creativity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(4), 6610-6625. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Impulso Colombia (2018) Sistematización de Manizales Más: Mapa de Procesos, Caracterización y documentos. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Isenberg, D. & Onyemah, V. (2016). Fostering Scale Up Ecosystems for Regional Economic Growth. In Global Entrepreneurship Congress (pp. 71-97). Global Entrepreneurship Research Network. http://genglobal.org/sites/default/files/INNOVATIONS_GEC-2016.pdf | spa |
dc.relation.references | Isenberg, D. (2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Babson Global. http://www.innovationamerica.us/images/stories/2011/The-entrepreneurshipecosystem-strategy-for-economic-growth-policy-20110620183915.pdf | spa |
dc.relation.references | Isenberg, D. (2011, May 25). Introducing the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem: Four Defining Characteristics. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/danisenberg/2011/05/25/introducing-theentrepreneurship-ecosystem-four-defining-characteristics/?sh=79b4fe805fe8 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Isenberg, D. (2014). What an entrepreneurship ecosystem actually is. Harvard Business Review, 5. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Isenberg, D. J. (2010). The Big Idea: How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Jones, P. (2014). Design Research Methods in Systemic Design. Institute for 21st Century Agoras. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Jones, P. (2014a). Design Research Methods in Systemic Design. Institute for 21st Century Agoras, 2014. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Jones, P. H. (2014b). Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems. In G. S. Metcalf (Ed.), Social Systems and Design (pp. 91-128). Springer. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Jones, P. (2014c). Relating Systems Thinking and Design II. Theoretical Evolution in Systemic Design. FORMakademisk-research journal for design and design education, 7(4). | spa |
dc.relation.references | KELLEY, T. A. (2001). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm (Vol. 10). Broadway Business. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Kline, S. J. & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth, 14, 640. Washington. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Krippendorff, K. (2005). The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. CRC Press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Krippendorff, K. (2006). The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Boca Ratón - CRC/Taylor & Francis. | spa |
dc.relation.references | La Patria. (2018, Mar 20). Manizales Más es el más exitoso: Babson College. https://www.lapatria.com/economia/manizales-mas-es-el-mas-exitoso-babsoncollege-413013 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Lewin, R. (1999). Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, ISBN 0226476553. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Low, M. B., & Abrahamson, E. (1997). Movements, bandwagons, and clones: Industry evolution and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(6), 435-457. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Manzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. (K. Friedman & E. Stolterman, Eds.). Massachusetts: MIT Press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Paris: Final Report to OECD http://lib.davender.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/03 /Entrepreneurial-ecosystems-OECD.pdf. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Max-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological economics, 53(1), 5- 16. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Maya, J. & Gómez, E. (2015). How Design Is Taught? A Survey of Approaches, Models \& Methods. DS82: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E\&PDE15), Great Expectations: Design Teaching, Research \& Enterprise, Loughborough, UK, 03-04.09. 2015. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Meroni, A., & Sangiorgi, D. (2011). Design for services. Gower Publishing, Ltd. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Metcalf, G. S. (2014). Creating Social Systems. In Social Systems and Design (pp. 1-36). Springer. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina Osorio, V. & Echeverri Gallego, F. (2019). Fundamentación del proceso formativo de empresas de alto potencial Manizales Más 2016. Universidad Autónoma de Manizales. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina Osorio, V. & Flórez Loaiza, L. M. (2018). Informe Final - Descripción de la experiencia de los empresarios de alto potencial, mediante la escritura de casos de enseñanza para el emprendimiento como herramienta en el aula de clase de los profesores de alto potencial de Manizales Más. Universidad Autónoma de Manizales. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina Osorio, V. (2017). The Mutualism Relation within the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. In International Symposium on Electronic Art 2017: Bio-Creation & Peace. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina Osorio, V., Londoño, J., Ospina, O., García, G., & Flórez Loaiza, L. (2018). Innovative Teachers Focused on Entrepreneurship, a Peek to “Profesores de Alto Potencial” program. In D. D. Remenyi (Ed.). 4th Teaching Innovation & Entrepreneurship Excellence Awards 2018. An Anthology of Case Histories (pp. 101-118). Acpi. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina, V. Vasquez, P (2017). "Ruta del Emprendimiento" A joint effort to have strong entrepreneurs. Innovation & Entrepreneurship Teaching Excellence Awards 2017 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Molina, V., & Valbuena, W. (2019). Mapping Creativity and Design within the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem. Kindai management review, 7, 39-53 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: a New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-83. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Morin, E. (1992). From the concept of system to the paradigm of complexity. Journal of social and evolutionary systems, 15(4), 371-385. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Nelson, H. & Stolterman, E. (2012). The Design Way - Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World (2nd ed.). MIT Press | spa |
dc.relation.references | Nelson, H. & Stolterman, E. (2012). The Design Way - Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World (2nd ed.). MIT Press | spa |
dc.relation.references | Neck, H. M., & Greene, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of small business management, 49(1), 55-70. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Norman, D. A. & Stappers, P. J. (2015). DesignX: Complex Sociotechnical Systems. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1(2), 83-106. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Odum, H. T. & Odum, B. (2003). Concepts and Methods of Ecological Engineering. Ecological Engineering, 20(5), 339-361. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Odum, H. T. & Odum, B. (2003). Concepts and Methods of Ecological Engineering. Ecological Engineering, 20(5), 339-361. | spa |
dc.relation.references | OKA Consultores (2019) - Informe de resultados toma de datos relaciones de valor entre los agentes del ecosistema de Emprendimiento Manizales Más | spa |
dc.relation.references | Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation. A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Pang, W., & Plucker, J. A. (2012). Recent transformations in China's economic, social, and education policies for promoting innovation and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(4), 247-273. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Papanek, V. & Fuller, R. B. (1972). Design for the Real World. Thames and Hudson . | spa |
dc.relation.references | Peltoniemi, M. & Vuori, E. (2004). Business Ecosystem as the New Approach to Complex Adaptive Business Environments. In Proceedings of eBusiness Research Forum, 2(22), 267-281. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Peltoniemi, M. (2006). Preliminary Theoretical Framework for the Study of Business Ecosystems. Emergence-Mahwah-Lawrence Erlbaum, 8(1), 10. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Pilinkienė, V. & Mačiulis, P. (2014). Comparison of Different Ecosystem Analogies: The Main Economic Determinants and Levels of Impact. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 365-370. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Quintana, M., Vargas, S., & Valbuena, W. S. (2017). La creatividad en el diseño: componentes sistémicos ¿Más codiseño, menos enseñanza? Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 29(3), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.5209/ARIS.55261 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Reymen, I. (2001). Improving design processes through structured reflection: A domainindependent approach (Vol. 31). Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Rittel, H. W. (1987). The Reasoning of Designers. IGP | spa |
dc.relation.references | Rittel, H. W. J. & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Rizzo, F. et al. (2016). Human Smart Cities: Rethinking the Interplay Between Design and Planning. Springer. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Rodríguez, L. & Peralta, C. (2014). From Product to Service Design: A Thinking Paradigm Shift. FORMakademisk - Research Journal for Design and Design Education, 7(3). https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/formakademisk/article/view/801/1117 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Ryan, A. & Leung, M., 2014. Systemic Design: Two Canadian Case Studies. FOR Makademisk-research journal for design and design education, 7(3). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Ryan, A. (2014). A Framework for Systemic Design. Form Akademisk - Research Journal for Design and Design Education, 7(4). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts Publication, 4(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2016). Convivial toolbox. Generative research for the front end of design. Ohio: BIS Publisher | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sarasvathy, S. D., & Venkataraman, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship as Method: Open Questions for an Entrepreneurship Future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 113-135. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sarasvathy, S.D., 2004. The questions we ask and the questions we care about: Reformulating some problems in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), pp.707-717. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sarasvathy, S. (2012). The entrepreneurial firm. In Handbook on Organisational Entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sargent, P. (1994). Design science or nonscience. Design Studies, 15(4), 389-402. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sawyer, K. R. (2006). Explaining Creativity - The Science if Human Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-1750(88)90050-4 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sawyer, K. R. (2006). Explaining Creativity - The Science if Human Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-1750(88)90050-4 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sawyer, R. K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development (translation of second German edition by Redvers Opie). Cambridge, MA, Harvard University | spa |
dc.relation.references | Scott, J. & Carrington, P. J. (2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Sage. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Selden, P.D. & Fletcher, D.E. (2015). The Entrepreneurial Journey as an Emergent Hierarchical System of Artifact-Creating Processes. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 603-615. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sevaldson, B. (2005). Developing Digital Design Techniques. Oslo: Oslo School of Architecture and Design. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sevaldson, B. (2008). Rich Design Research Space. FORMakademisk - Research Journal for Design and Design Education, 1(1). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sevaldson, B. (2009). Why should we and how can we make the design process more complex. Fremtid Formes/Shaping Futures. Oslo: Oslo School of Architecture and Design. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sevaldson, B. (2010). Discussions & Movements in Design Research. A Systems Approach to Practice Research in Design. Form Akademisk, 3(1), 8-35. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press | spa |
dc.relation.references | Simonton, D. K. (2012). Fields, domains, and individuals. In M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 67-86). Davis, California: Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00004-5 | spa |
dc.relation.references | Skyttner, L. (2005). General Systems Theory: Problems, Perspectives, Practice. World Scientific. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Strauss, A. y Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la Teoría Fundamentada. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Tansley, A.G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284-307. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Timmons, J. A. (1989). The Entrepreneurial Mind. Brick House Publishing Co., 3 Main St., PO Box 512, Andover, MA (clothbound: ISBN-0-931790-84-0; paperback: ISBN-0- 931790-85-9,). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Valdez, J. (2005). The Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Toward a Theory of New Business Formation. Small Business Institute Director's Association. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Valdez, J., 2000. The entrepreneurship ecosystem: toward a theory of new business formation. Small Business Institute Directors. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 3(1), 119-138. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Wenger, E. (2001). Comunidades de práctica: aprendizaje, significado e identidad. Barcelona, Buenos Aires, México: Paidós. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Boston: Addison-Wesley. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Young, J.G. (1985). “What is creativity?”, Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 77-87. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Zampetakis, L. A. & Moustakis, V. (2006). Linking creativity with entrepreneurial intentions: A structural approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(3), 413-428. | spa |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | spa |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | spa |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | spa |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Entrepreneurship ecosystems | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Modelling ecosystems | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Complex adaptive systems | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Agents | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Systemic design | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Entrepreneurship | eng |
dc.subject.unesco | Diseño de sistemas | |
dc.subject.unesco | Diseño | |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06 | spa |
dc.type.content | Text | spa |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis | spa |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | spa |
oaire.version | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | spa |
oaire.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf | spa |
dc.description.degreename | Doctor(a) en Diseño y Creación | spa |
dc.publisher.program | Doctorado en Diseño y Creación | spa |
dc.description.researchgroup | Gestión y Transmisión del Conocimiento | spa |
dc.rights.coar | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf | spa |