Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorMaya Castaño, Jorge Hernán
dc.contributor.authorMolina Osorio, Viviana
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-09T22:22:12Z
dc.date.available2032-08-01
dc.date.available2022-08-09T22:22:12Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-08
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/17905
dc.descriptionIlustraciones, gráficasspa
dc.description.abstractspa:El modelar ecosistemas de emprendimiento hasta ahora había sido tarea de economistas para justificar con datos de ventas y generación de empleo el posible impacto que tiene este tipo de intervención para el desarrollo económico. Desde el inicio hubo preguntas acerca de si hay otra forma de medir un ecosistema, de conocerlo y visualizar otros posibles impactos más allá del económico. Fue allí donde recurrimos al diseño como disciplina integradora para buscar nuevas formas de modelar y de ser posible diseñar ecosistemas de emprendimiento, entendiendo que allí se mueve algo más que solo dinero. Escogimos el estudio de caso como método descriptivo exploratorio para tener la posibilidad de movernos entre una gran cantidad de información recolectada, un método que nos permitiera dar cuenta de la complejidad del objeto de estudio y que también tuviera la suficiente flexibilidad de abrir campo a otros métodos que se requirieran para ahondar en la exploración del ecosistema Manizales Más. La contribución final de esta tesis es la modelación a través de diferentes métodos del mismo ecosistema, lo que nos permite ver diferentes elementos y comprender mejor como se relacionan los agentes, qué hay en las dimensiones y cuáles podrían ser otras formas de medirlos. Al final no se propone un único método para modelar ecosistemas, más bien se propone una metáfora que permita una reflexión a los posibles agentes interesados en fomentar su ecosistema de emprendimiento acerca de cada uno de los elementos que debe tener en cuenta y del papel que tiene el diseñador en ese proceso, de esta forma la metáfora del jardinero busca ampliar la metáfora biológica ya existente aclarando cada dimensión y el papel crucial del jardinero en la misma.spa
dc.description.abstracteng:Up until now, modeling entrepreneurship ecosystems had been the task of economists to justify with sales data and job creation the possible impact that this type of intervention has for economic development. From the beginning, there were questions about whether there is another way to measure an ecosystem, to model it, and to visualize other possible impacts beyond the economic one, and it was there that we turned to design as an integrative discipline to seek new ways to model and, if possible, design ecosystems of entrepreneurship, understanding that something more than just money moves in there. We chose the case study as an exploratory descriptive method to have the possibility of moving between a large amount of information collected, a method that would allow us to account for the complexity of the study object and that also had enough flexibility to open the field to other methods that were required to delve into the exploration of the Manizales Más ecosystem. The final contribution of this thesis is modeling through different methods the same ecosystem, which allows us to see different elements and better understand how the agents are related, what is in the dimensions and what could be other ways of measuring them. In the end, a single method is not proposed to model ecosystems but rather a metaphor is proposed, that allows a reflection to the possible stakeholders interested in promoting their entrepreneurial ecosystem about each of the elements that must be taken into consideration and the role that plays the designer in this process. In this way, the proposition of the metaphor of a gardener seeks to expand the already existing biological metaphor by clarifying each dimension and the crucial role of the gardener in it.eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsModelling entrepreneurship ecosystems as a design process: Manizales Más case study / Acknowledgement / Resumen / Abstract / Content Table / List of Figures / List of Tables / Publications List / INTRODUCTION / Document structure / 1. Successful entrepreneurship ecosystems for regional development: a proposal for their modelling and creation / Introduction / 1.1. Three problems in developing entrepreneurship ecosystems: levels-definition, agentdomain relations, and their creation / 1.2. What is Manizales Más? / 1.3. Literature Review / 1.4. Research Methods Proposal / 1.5. Complex Adaptive Systems: Conceptual Elements to Model an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem / 1.6. Ecosystemic Approach to Understand the Network Flows / 1.7. Systemic Design as a Possible Framework to Design Entrepreneurial Ecosystems / 1.8. Concluding Remarks / 1.9. References / 2. Research Project / 2.1. Project Rationale / 2.1.1. Studying Entrepreneurship Ecosystems from a Design Standpoint / 2.1.2 Why to Choose the Knowledge Management Research Line of Design and Creation PhD / 2.2. Research Questions / 2.3. Research Goals / 2.3.1. Main Goal / 2.3.2. Specific Goals / 2.4. Why did We Choose Manizales Más as our Study Case? / 2.5. Research Strategy / 2.6. Research Process Over the PhD Duration / 2.6.1. First Year 2015-2016 / 2.6.2. Second Year 2017 / 2.6.3. Third Year 2018 / 2.6.4. Fourth Year 2019-2020 / 2.6.5. Fifth Year 2020 – 2021 / 2.7. References / 3. Methodology: A Mix of Methods to Understand Entrepreneurship Ecosystems / 3.1. Case Study / 3.1.1. Case Study Protocol / 3.2. Literature Review and Thematic Analysis / 3.3. Document Analysis and Participant observation / 3.4. Modelling / 3.5. Results, Analysis and Discussion / 3.6. References / 4. Theoretical Framework / 4.1. The Common Playfield Among Creativity, Design, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. Results from a Thematic Analysis / 4.1.1. Methodology / 4.1.2. Results / 4.1.3. Conclusions / 4.2. Designing Entrepreneurship Ecosystems / 4.2.1. Framing Entrepreneurship Evolution / 4.2.2. The Different Design Orders / 4.2.3. The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem as a Fourth Order Artifact / 4.3. Conclusions / 4.4. References: / 5. Manizales Más in Depth / 5.1. Manizales Más Creation and Evolution / 5.2. Manizales Más Organizational Structure / 11 5.3. anizales Más Program Description / 5.3.1. EAP Empresas de Alto Potencial / 5.3.2. Mentoría Empresarial / 5.3.3. Affiliates / 5.3.4. PAP: Profesores de Alto Potencial / 5.3.5. Addventure Más / 5.3.6. Startup Más / 5.3.7. Ruta del Emprendimiento / 5.3.8. Vender Más / 5.3.9. Crecer Más / 5.3.10. Growth Team / 5.3.11. Other programs / 5.4. Previous Manizales Más models / 5.4.1. Systematization Universidad de Manizales / 5.4.2. Process Map / 5.5. Conclusions / 5.6. References / 6. Contribution: a proposal of entrepreneurial ecosystem design-based models based on Manizales Más / 6.1. Agent Based Modelling / 6.1.1. Introduction / 6.1.2. Objective / 6.1.3. Methodology / 6.1.4. Results / 6.1.5. Conclusions / 6.2. Mapping Creativity and Design within the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem / 6.2.1. Introduction / 6.2.2. Objectives / 6.2.3. Theoretical Framework / 6.2.4. Instruments and Methods / 6.2.5. Findings / 6.2.6. Discussion / 6.2.7. Implications / 6.2.8. Conclusions / 6.3. Manizales Más Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Analysis of Value Relationships / 6.3.1. Introduction / 6.3.2. Objective: / 6.3.3. Theoretical Background: Value flow model / 6.3.4. Design technique and information gathering instruments / 6.3.5. Results &Analysis / 6.3.6. Conclusions / 6.4. Manizales Más Nested Design Levels Model / 6.4.1. Introduction / 6.4.2. Objective / 6.4.3. Reymen’s modelling Methodology / 6.4.4. Structured analysis and design technique / 6.4.5. Modelling process / 6.4.6. Results / 6.4.7. Discussion of results / 6.4.8. Design Orders, An exploration in Manizales Más / 6.5. Conclusions / 6.6. References / 7. Entrepreneurship Ecosystems: The Gardener Metaphor / 7.1. What is a garden made of? / 7.1.1. Plants - Markets / 7.1.2. Soil / Substrate – Culture / 7.1.3. Pollinators - Human Capital / 7.1.4. Fertilizers - Public Policy / 7.1.5. Seedbed / greenhouse - Support entities / 7.1.6. Water – Finance / 7.1.7. Gardening tools – Administration / 7.1.8. Migrating animals - External relations / 7.2. Who is the Gardener? / 7.2.1. The Gardener that just spreads the seed around / 7.2.2. The gardener working for curbside appeal / 7.2.3.The gardener that dreams with a topiary / 13 7.2.4. The Versailles gardener / 7.3. What about the weeds? / 7.4. The gardener metaphor turning into the tale of a gardener / 7.5. Conclusions About the Interactions, Blossoming and Withering / 7.6. References / 8. Discussion / 8.1 How did we reach each objective? / 8.2 key findings and rationale in choosing each modeling method / 8.3 concluding summary / 8.4 Limitations / 8.5 Future work / 9. Conclusions / 10. Full Bibliography / 11. Appendix / Appendix 1. Documents Included on Thematic Analysis / Appendix 2. List of Manizales Más files.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.titleModelling entrepreneurship ecosystems as a design process: Manizales Más case studyeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctoradospa
dc.contributor.researchgroupDICOVI: Diseño y Cognición en Entornos Visuales y Virtuales (Categoría A1)spa
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad de Caldasspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad de Caldasspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.cospa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Artes y Humanidadesspa
dc.publisher.placeManizalesspa
dc.relation.referencesBowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027spa
dc.relation.referencesCalderon Hernandez, G., Naranjo Valencia, J., Alvarez Giraldo, C. and Trujillo Henao, L. (2016). Manizales Más: Modelo de emprendimiento para el desarrollo de la ciudad, sistematización de la experiencia. Universidad de Manizales.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzalez de Londoño, A. (2014). Teoría y Casos de Innovación social. Caracterización de Manizales Más una experiencia de Emprendimiento de Alto Impacto en Colombia. Maestría en Creatividad e innovación en las organizaciones. Universidad Autónoma de Manizales.spa
dc.relation.referencesImpulso Colombia (2018) Sistematización de Manizales Más: Mapa de Procesos, Caracterización y documentos.spa
dc.relation.referencesIsenberg, D. J. (2010). The Big Idea: How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50.spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina, V. Florez, L. Londoño, J. García, G. Ospina, O. (2018). Innovative teachers focused on entrepreneurship, a peek to “Profesores de Alto Potencial” program. Innovation and entrepreneurship teaching excellence award 2018, 101-118spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina, V. Vasquez, P (2017). "Ruta del Emprendimiento" A joint effort to have strong entrepreneurs. Innovation & Entrepreneurship Teaching Excellence Awards 2017spa
dc.relation.referencesManizales Más Scalerator Handbook 2013spa
dc.relation.referencesOKA Consultores (2019) - Informe de resultados toma de datos relaciones de valor entre los agentes del ecosistema de Emprendimiento Manizales Másspa
dc.relation.referencesManizales Más Rio de Janeiro Presentationspa
dc.relation.referencesManizales Más 2020 Presentationspa
dc.relation.referencesManizales Más 150708 BM DNP Presentationspa
dc.relation.referencesAmabile, T. M., Hennessey, B., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social Influences on Creativity: The Effects of Contracted-for Reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.50.1.14spa
dc.relation.referencesAmabile, T. M. (1993). What does a theory of creativity require?. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 179-181.spa
dc.relation.referencesAmabile, T. M. & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 46(12), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001spa
dc.relation.referencesBrännback M., Carsrud A. (2009) Cognitive Maps in Entrepreneurship: Researching Sense Making and Action. In: Carsrud A., Brännback M. (eds) Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 24. Springer, New York, NYspa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, T. & Kātz, B. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Collinsspa
dc.relation.referencesBruns, K., Bosma, N., Sanders, M. & Schramm, M. (2017). Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a regional cross-section growth regression approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 31-54. Springerspa
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarroll G.R., Khessina O.M. (2005) The Ecology of Entrepreneurship. In: Alvarez S.A., Agarwal R., Sorenson O. (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MAspa
dc.relation.referencesCameron, B. G., Crawley, E. F., Loureiro, G. & Rebentisch, E. S. (2008). Value flow mapping: Using networks to inform stakeholder analysis. Acta Astronautica, 62(4), 324-333. Elsevierspa
dc.relation.referencesCollins, P. K. (2015). Building a local design and entrepreneurship ecosystem. Procedia Technology, 20, 258-262.spa
dc.relation.referencesCortés, E., & Cruz, A. (2015). Generative Design as Tool for Social Innovation : A Methodological Approach. In Back to the Future [icdhs 10th + 1 Conference] Proceedings Book (pp. 44-48).spa
dc.relation.referencesCross, N. (2011). Designerly ways of knowing. Bloomsbury Londonspa
dc.relation.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The systems model of creativity: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer, New York, NYspa
dc.relation.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creatividad. El fluir y la psicología del descubrimiento y la invención. (J. P. Tosaus, Trans.). Barcelona. Buenos Aires. México: Paidos. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2spa
dc.relation.referencesDen Ouden, E. (2011). Innovation design: Creating value for people, organizations and society. Springer Science & Business Media, London.spa
dc.relation.referencesDimov, D. (2016). Toward a design science of entrepreneurship. In Jerome A. Katz, Andrew C. Corbett (ed.) Models of start-up thinking and action: Theoretical, empirical and pedagogical approaches (pp. 1-31). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.spa
dc.relation.referencesDino, R. N. (2015). Crossing boundaries: Toward integrating creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship research through practice. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 139.spa
dc.relation.referencesEhrentreich, N. (2007). Agent-based modeling: The Santa Fe Institute artificial stock market model revisited. Springer Science & Business Media.spa
dc.relation.referencesFallman, D. (2008). The Interaction Design Research Triangle of Design Practice, Design Studies, and Design Exploration. Design Issues, 24(3), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.3.4spa
dc.relation.referencesHanrahan, P., 2006. Vizql: a language for query, analysis and visualization. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. pp. 721-721.spa
dc.relation.referencesHausmann, R. (2008). High Bandwidth Development Policy. RWP08-060.spa
dc.relation.referencesIsenberg, D. (2014). What an entrepreneurship ecosystem actually is. Harvard Business Review, 5.spa
dc.relation.referencesIsenberg, D. J. (2010). The Big Idea: How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50.spa
dc.relation.referencesIsenberg, D. (2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Babson Global. http://www.innovationamerica.us/images/stories/2011/The-entrepreneurshipecosystem-strategy-for-economic-growth-policy-20110620183915.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesIsenberg, D. & Onyemah, V. (2016). Fostering Scale Up Ecosystems for Regional Economic Growth. In Global Entrepreneurship Congress (pp. 71-97). Global Entrepreneurship Research Network. http://genglobal.org/sites/default/files/INNOVATIONS_GEC-2016.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesJones, P. (2014a). Design Research Methods in Systemic Design. Institute for 21st Century Agoras, 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, P. H. (2014b). Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems. In G. S. Metcalf (Ed.), Social Systems and Design (pp. 91-128). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, P. (2014c). Relating Systems Thinking and Design II. Theoretical Evolution in Systemic Design. FORMakademisk-research journal for design and design education, 7(4).spa
dc.relation.referencesMason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Paris: Final Report to OECD http://lib.davender.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/03 /Entrepreneurial-ecosystems-OECD.pdf.spa
dc.relation.referencesManzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. (K. Friedman & E. Stolterman, Eds.). Massachusetts: MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina Osorio, V. (2017). The Mutualism Relation within the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. In International Symposium on Electronic Art 2017: Bio-Creation & Peace.spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina, V., & Valbuena, W. (2019). Mapping Creativity and Design within the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem. Kindai management review, 7, 39-53.spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina Osorio, V. & Echeverri Gallego, F. (2019). Fundamentación del proceso formativo de empresas de alto potencial Manizales Más 2016. Universidad Autónoma de Manizales.spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina Osorio, V. & Flórez Loaiza, L. M. (2018). Informe Final - Descripción de la experiencia de los empresarios de alto potencial, mediante la escritura de casos de enseñanza para el emprendimiento como herramienta en el aula de clase de los profesores de alto potencial de Manizales Más. Universidad Autónoma de Manizales.spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina Osorio, V., Londoño, J., Ospina, O., García, G., & Flórez Loaiza, L. (2018). Innovative Teachers Focused on Entrepreneurship, a Peek to “Profesores de Alto Potencial” program. In D. D. Remenyi (Ed.). 4th Teaching Innovation & Entrepreneurship Excellence Awards 2018. An Anthology of Case Histories (pp. 101-118). Acpi.spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina, V., & Valbuena, W. (2019). Mapping Creativity and Design within the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem. Kindai management review, 7, 39-53. Max-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological economics, 53(1), 5- 16.spa
dc.relation.referencesOKA Consultores (2019) - Informe de resultados toma de datos relaciones de valor entre los agentes del ecosistema de Emprendimiento Manizales Másspa
dc.relation.referencesQuintana, M., Vargas, S., & Valbuena, W. S. (2017). La creatividad en el diseño: componentes sistémicos ¿Más codiseño, menos enseñanza? Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 29(3), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.5209/ARIS.55261spa
dc.relation.referencesReymen, I. (2001). Improving design processes through structured reflection: A domainindependent approach (Vol. 31). Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.spa
dc.relation.referencesSanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts Publication, 4(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068spa
dc.relation.referencesSanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183spa
dc.relation.referencesSanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2016). Convivial toolbox. Generative research for the front end of design. Ohio: BIS Publisher.spa
dc.relation.referencesSarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesSawyer, R. K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSawyer, K. R. (2006). Explaining Creativity - The Science if Human Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-1750(88)90050-4spa
dc.relation.referencesScott, J. & Carrington, P. J. (2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development (translation of second German edition by Redvers Opie). Cambridge, MA, Harvard University.spa
dc.relation.referencesSevaldson, B. (2010). Discussions & Movements in Design Research. A Systems Approach to Practice Research in Design. Form Akademisk, 3(1), 8-35.spa
dc.relation.referencesSimon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSimonton, D. K. (2012). Fields, domains, and individuals. In M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 67-86). Davis, California: Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00004-5spa
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A. y Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la Teoría Fundamentada. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia.spa
dc.relation.referencesWasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Vol. 8). New York: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWenger, E. (2001). Comunidades de práctica: aprendizaje, significado e identidad. Barcelona, Buenos Aires, México: Paidós.spa
dc.relation.referencesDen Ouden, E. (2011). Innovation design: Creating value for people, organizations and society. Springer Science & Business Mediaspa
dc.relation.referencesPilinkienė, V. & Mačiulis, P. (2014). Comparison of Different Ecosystem Analogies: The Main Economic Determinants and Levels of Impact. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 365-370.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlexander, C. (1964). Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Harvard University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesAlexander, C. (2002). The Nature of Order: An Essay on the Art of Building and the nature of the universe. Taylor & Francisspa
dc.relation.referencesAlexiou, K., Johnson, J., & Zamenopoulos, T. (2009). Embracing Complexity in Design. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesAmabile, T. M. (1993). What does a theory of creativity require?. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 179-181.spa
dc.relation.referencesAmabile, T. M. & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 46(12), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001spa
dc.relation.referencesAmabile, T. M., Hennessey, B., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social Influences on Creativity: The Effects of Contracted-for Reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.50.1.14spa
dc.relation.referencesAnggraeni, E., Den Hartigh, E., & Zegveld, M. (2007). Business Ecosystem as a Perspective for Studying the Relations Between Firms and Their Business Networks. In ECCON 2007 Annual Meeting (pp. 1-21). Eburon Academic Publishers.spa
dc.relation.referencesArcher, B. (1981). A View of the Nature of Design Research. Design: Science: Method, 30- 47.spa
dc.relation.referencesArcher, B. (2007). A View of the Nature of Design Research. Royal College of Art.spa
dc.relation.referencesAriza, N. & Maya, J. (2014). Proposal To Identify the Essential Elements To Construct Construct a User Experience Model With the Product Using the Thematic Analysis Technique. Proceedings of the 13th International Design Conference DESIGN 2014, 11-22.spa
dc.relation.referencesAspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs. (2013). Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Diagnostic Toolkit .spa
dc.relation.referencesBanathy, B. H. (2013). Designing Social Systems in a Changing World. Springer Science - Business Media.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeckman, S. L. & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking. California Management Review, 50(1), 25-56.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoard of IJDCI, E. (2013). Perspectives on design creativity and innovation research. Taylor \& Francis.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoden, M. (1992). The Creative Mind, Abacus, Londonspa
dc.relation.referencesBohemia, E., Liedtka, J., & Rieple, A. (2012). Leading Innovation Through Design: Proceedings of the DMI 2012 International Research Conference. Design Management Institute and Authors.spa
dc.relation.referencesBowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027spa
dc.relation.referencesBrännback M., Carsrud A. (2009) Cognitive Maps in Entrepreneurship: Researching Sense Making and Action. In: Carsrud A., Brännback M. (eds) Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 24. Springer, New York, NYspa
dc.relation.referencesBraun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.spa
dc.relation.referencesBraunerhjelm, P. (2010). Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth-past Experience, Current Knowledge and Policy Implications. CESIS, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, T. & Kātz, B. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Collinsspa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.spa
dc.relation.referencesBruns, K., Bosma, N., Sanders, M. & Schramm, M. (2017). Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a regional cross-section growth regression approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 31-54. Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrush, C. G., Duhaime, I. M., Gartner, W. B., Stewart, A., Katz, J. A., Hitt, M. A, Venkataraman, S. (2003). Doctoral education in the field of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan, R. (1985). Declaration by Design: Rhetoric, Argument, and Demonstration in design practice. Design Issues, 2(1), 4-22.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan, R. (1998). Design in Contemporary Culture. Design Issues, 14(1), 3-20.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design issues, 17(4), 3-23.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan, R. (2019). Systems Thinking and Design Thinking: The Search for Principles in the World We Are Making. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(2), 85-104.spa
dc.relation.referencesBull, I. & Willard, G. E. (1993). Towards a Theory of Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 183-195.spa
dc.relation.referencesCalderon Hernandez, G., Naranjo Valencia, J., Alvarez Giraldo, C. and Trujillo Henao, L. (2016). Manizales Más: Modelo de emprendimiento para el desarrollo de la ciudad, sistematización de la experiencia. Universidad de Manizales.spa
dc.relation.referencesCameron, B. G., Crawley, E. F., Loureiro, G. & Rebentisch, E. S. (2008). Value flow mapping: Using networks to inform stakeholder analysis. Acta Astronautica, 62(4), 324-333. Elsevier.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarayannis, E. G. (2013). Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarroll G.R., Khessina O.M. (2005) The Ecology of Entrepreneurship. In: Alvarez S.A., Agarwal R., Sorenson O. (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MAspa
dc.relation.referencesCheckland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wileyspa
dc.relation.referencesCollins, P. K. (2015). Building a Local Design and Entrepreneurship Ecosystem. Procedia Technology, 20, 258-262.spa
dc.relation.referencesCortés, E., & Cruz, A. (2015). Generative Design as Tool for Social Innovation : A Methodological Approach. In Back to the Future [icdhs 10th + 1 Conference] Proceedings Book (pp. 44-48).spa
dc.relation.referencesCross, N. (1982). Designerly Ways of Knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221-227.spa
dc.relation.referencesCross, N. (Ed.). (1984). Design Methodology. Wiley.spa
dc.relation.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creatividad. El fluir y la psicología del descubrimiento y la invención. (J. P. Tosaus, Trans.). Barcelona. Buenos Aires. México: Paidos. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2spa
dc.relation.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and Creativity. Namta Journal, 22(2), 60-97.spa
dc.relation.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The systems model of creativity: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer, New York, NYspa
dc.relation.referencesDarzentas, J. & Darzentas, J. S. (2014). Systems Thinking in Design: Service Design and Self-Services. Form Akademisk - Research Journal for Design and Design Education, 7(4).spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Laplante, K., 2005. IS ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT A POSTMODERN SCIENCE? Ecological paradigms lost: Routes of theory change, 2, p.397.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Solla, D. J. (1986). Little Science, Big Science... and Beyond. Columbia University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesDen Ouden, E. (2011). Innovation design: Creating value for people, organizations and society. Springer Science & Business Media.spa
dc.relation.referencesDimov, D. (2016). Toward a design science of entrepreneurship. In Jerome A. Katz, Andrew C. Corbett (ed.) Models of start-up thinking and action: Theoretical, empirical and pedagogical approaches (pp. 1-31). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.spa
dc.relation.referencesDino, R. N. (2015). Crossing boundaries: Toward Integrating creativity, innovation, and Entrepreneurship Research Through Practice. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 139-145.spa
dc.relation.referencesDorst, K. (2008). Design research: a revolution-waiting-to-happen. Design Studies, 29(1), 4-11.spa
dc.relation.referencesDorst, K. (2011). The Core of “Design Thinking” and its Application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521-532.spa
dc.relation.referencesDrucker, P. F. (1986). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. Harper & Row.spa
dc.relation.referencesDrucker, P.F. (1985).Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Harper & Row Publishersspa
dc.relation.referencesDubberly, H. (2008). Design in The Age of Biology: Shifting From a Mechanical-Object Ethos to an Organic-Systems Ethos. Dubberly Design Office. http://www.dubberly.com/articles/design-in-the-age-of-biology.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesEhrentreich, N. (2007). Agent-based modeling: The Santa Fe Institute artificial stock market model revisited. Springer Science & Business Media.spa
dc.relation.referencesElia, G., Li, X., Margherita, A. & Petti, C. (2017). Human-oriented Corporate Entrepreneurship: an Integrative framework of Creativity and HRM Enablers. European Business Review, 29(4). Emerald Publishing Limited.spa
dc.relation.referencesEvbuomwan, N., Sivaloganathan, S. & Jebb, A. (1996). A survey of design philosophies, models, methods and systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 210(4), 301-320. Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England.spa
dc.relation.referencesFagerberg, J. (2004). Innovation: a guide to the literature.spa
dc.relation.referencesFallman, D. (2008). The Interaction Design Research Triangle of Design Practice, Design Studies, and Design Exploration. Design Issues, 24(3), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.3.4spa
dc.relation.referencesFereday, J. & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2008). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92.spa
dc.relation.referencesFiet, J. O., Norton, W. I., & Clouse, V. G. H. (2013). Search and discovery by repeatedly successful entrepreneurs. International Small Business Journal, 31(November 2012), 890-913.spa
dc.relation.referencesFillis, I. & Rentschler, R. (2010). The role of creativity in entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 18(01), 49-81.spa
dc.relation.referencesFord, D.V. and Harris, J.J. (1992). “The elusive definition of creativity”, Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 186-198.spa
dc.relation.referencesGartner, W. B. (1988). “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. American journal of small business, 12(4), 11-32.spa
dc.relation.referencesGharajedaghi, J. (2011). Socio-cultural Systems. Ackoff Center Weblog. http://ackoffcenter.blogs.com/ackoff_center_weblog/2013/05/socio-culturalsystems.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesGuilford, J.P (1950), “Creativity”, American Psychologist, Vol. 5, p444spa
dc.relation.referencesGoldsby, M. G., & Nelson, T. E. (2012). Entrepreneurship Design: A Design Based Theory of Entrepreneurship - ProQuest. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 23(No. 2).spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzalez de Londoño, A. (2014). Teoría y Casos de Innovación social. Caracterización de Manizales Más una experiencia de Emprendimiento de Alto Impacto en Colombia. Maestría en Creatividad e innovación en las organizaciones. Universidad Autónoma de Manizales.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraham, K. (2014). TechMatters: “Qiqqa” than you can say Reference Management: A Tool to Organize the Research Process. LOEX Quarterly, 40, 4-6.spa
dc.relation.referencesHanrahan, P., 2006. Vizql: a language for query, analysis and visualization. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. pp. 721-721.spa
dc.relation.referencesHatchuel, A., Le Masson, P. & Weil, B. (2008). Studying creative design: the contribution of CK theory. NSF International Workshop on Studying Design Creativity (Vol. 8).spa
dc.relation.referencesHausmann, R. (2008). High Bandwidth Development Policy. RWP08-060spa
dc.relation.referencesHawken, P., Lovins, A. B., & Lovins, L. H. (2013). Natural Capitalism: The Next Industrial Revolution. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesHekkert, M. P. (2012). Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Science and public policy, 39(1), 74-87.spa
dc.relation.referencesHenderson, A. (2003). Design for Evolution. Presentation at HITS Conference, IIT/ID Chicago, United States.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolland, J. H. (1995). Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Basic Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolland, J. H. (2006). Studying Complex Adaptive Systems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 19(1), 1-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesHorváth, I. (2007). Comparison of three methodological approaches of design research. In DS 42: Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, Paris, France, 28.-31.07. 2007 (pp. 361-362).spa
dc.relation.referencesHunter, S.T., Bedell, K.E. and Mumford, M.D. (2007). “Climate for creativity: a quantitative review”, Creativity Research Journal, Vol.19, No.1, pp.69-90.spa
dc.relation.referencesIba, T. (2010). An autopoietic systems theory for creativity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(4), 6610-6625.spa
dc.relation.referencesImpulso Colombia (2018) Sistematización de Manizales Más: Mapa de Procesos, Caracterización y documentos.spa
dc.relation.referencesIsenberg, D. & Onyemah, V. (2016). Fostering Scale Up Ecosystems for Regional Economic Growth. In Global Entrepreneurship Congress (pp. 71-97). Global Entrepreneurship Research Network. http://genglobal.org/sites/default/files/INNOVATIONS_GEC-2016.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesIsenberg, D. (2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Babson Global. http://www.innovationamerica.us/images/stories/2011/The-entrepreneurshipecosystem-strategy-for-economic-growth-policy-20110620183915.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesIsenberg, D. (2011, May 25). Introducing the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem: Four Defining Characteristics. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/danisenberg/2011/05/25/introducing-theentrepreneurship-ecosystem-four-defining-characteristics/?sh=79b4fe805fe8spa
dc.relation.referencesIsenberg, D. (2014). What an entrepreneurship ecosystem actually is. Harvard Business Review, 5.spa
dc.relation.referencesIsenberg, D. J. (2010). The Big Idea: How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50.spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, P. (2014). Design Research Methods in Systemic Design. Institute for 21st Century Agoras.spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, P. (2014a). Design Research Methods in Systemic Design. Institute for 21st Century Agoras, 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, P. H. (2014b). Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems. In G. S. Metcalf (Ed.), Social Systems and Design (pp. 91-128). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, P. (2014c). Relating Systems Thinking and Design II. Theoretical Evolution in Systemic Design. FORMakademisk-research journal for design and design education, 7(4).spa
dc.relation.referencesKELLEY, T. A. (2001). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm (Vol. 10). Broadway Business.spa
dc.relation.referencesKline, S. J. & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth, 14, 640. Washington.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrippendorff, K. (2005). The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. CRC Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrippendorff, K. (2006). The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Boca Ratón - CRC/Taylor & Francis.spa
dc.relation.referencesLa Patria. (2018, Mar 20). Manizales Más es el más exitoso: Babson College. https://www.lapatria.com/economia/manizales-mas-es-el-mas-exitoso-babsoncollege-413013spa
dc.relation.referencesLewin, R. (1999). Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, ISBN 0226476553.spa
dc.relation.referencesLow, M. B., & Abrahamson, E. (1997). Movements, bandwagons, and clones: Industry evolution and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(6), 435-457.spa
dc.relation.referencesManzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. (K. Friedman & E. Stolterman, Eds.). Massachusetts: MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Paris: Final Report to OECD http://lib.davender.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/03 /Entrepreneurial-ecosystems-OECD.pdf.spa
dc.relation.referencesMax-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological economics, 53(1), 5- 16.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaya, J. & Gómez, E. (2015). How Design Is Taught? A Survey of Approaches, Models \& Methods. DS82: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E\&PDE15), Great Expectations: Design Teaching, Research \& Enterprise, Loughborough, UK, 03-04.09. 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesMeroni, A., & Sangiorgi, D. (2011). Design for services. Gower Publishing, Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesMetcalf, G. S. (2014). Creating Social Systems. In Social Systems and Design (pp. 1-36). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina Osorio, V. & Echeverri Gallego, F. (2019). Fundamentación del proceso formativo de empresas de alto potencial Manizales Más 2016. Universidad Autónoma de Manizales.spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina Osorio, V. & Flórez Loaiza, L. M. (2018). Informe Final - Descripción de la experiencia de los empresarios de alto potencial, mediante la escritura de casos de enseñanza para el emprendimiento como herramienta en el aula de clase de los profesores de alto potencial de Manizales Más. Universidad Autónoma de Manizales.spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina Osorio, V. (2017). The Mutualism Relation within the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. In International Symposium on Electronic Art 2017: Bio-Creation & Peace.spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina Osorio, V., Londoño, J., Ospina, O., García, G., & Flórez Loaiza, L. (2018). Innovative Teachers Focused on Entrepreneurship, a Peek to “Profesores de Alto Potencial” program. In D. D. Remenyi (Ed.). 4th Teaching Innovation & Entrepreneurship Excellence Awards 2018. An Anthology of Case Histories (pp. 101-118). Acpi.spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina, V. Vasquez, P (2017). "Ruta del Emprendimiento" A joint effort to have strong entrepreneurs. Innovation & Entrepreneurship Teaching Excellence Awards 2017spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina, V., & Valbuena, W. (2019). Mapping Creativity and Design within the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem. Kindai management review, 7, 39-53spa
dc.relation.referencesMoore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: a New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-83.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorin, E. (1992). From the concept of system to the paradigm of complexity. Journal of social and evolutionary systems, 15(4), 371-385.spa
dc.relation.referencesNelson, H. & Stolterman, E. (2012). The Design Way - Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World (2nd ed.). MIT Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesNelson, H. & Stolterman, E. (2012). The Design Way - Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World (2nd ed.). MIT Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesNeck, H. M., & Greene, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of small business management, 49(1), 55-70.spa
dc.relation.referencesNorman, D. A. & Stappers, P. J. (2015). DesignX: Complex Sociotechnical Systems. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1(2), 83-106.spa
dc.relation.referencesOdum, H. T. & Odum, B. (2003). Concepts and Methods of Ecological Engineering. Ecological Engineering, 20(5), 339-361.spa
dc.relation.referencesOdum, H. T. & Odum, B. (2003). Concepts and Methods of Ecological Engineering. Ecological Engineering, 20(5), 339-361.spa
dc.relation.referencesOKA Consultores (2019) - Informe de resultados toma de datos relaciones de valor entre los agentes del ecosistema de Emprendimiento Manizales Másspa
dc.relation.referencesOsterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation. A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley.spa
dc.relation.referencesPang, W., & Plucker, J. A. (2012). Recent transformations in China's economic, social, and education policies for promoting innovation and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(4), 247-273.spa
dc.relation.referencesPapanek, V. & Fuller, R. B. (1972). Design for the Real World. Thames and Hudson .spa
dc.relation.referencesPeltoniemi, M. & Vuori, E. (2004). Business Ecosystem as the New Approach to Complex Adaptive Business Environments. In Proceedings of eBusiness Research Forum, 2(22), 267-281.spa
dc.relation.referencesPeltoniemi, M. (2006). Preliminary Theoretical Framework for the Study of Business Ecosystems. Emergence-Mahwah-Lawrence Erlbaum, 8(1), 10.spa
dc.relation.referencesPilinkienė, V. & Mačiulis, P. (2014). Comparison of Different Ecosystem Analogies: The Main Economic Determinants and Levels of Impact. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 365-370.spa
dc.relation.referencesQuintana, M., Vargas, S., & Valbuena, W. S. (2017). La creatividad en el diseño: componentes sistémicos ¿Más codiseño, menos enseñanza? Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 29(3), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.5209/ARIS.55261spa
dc.relation.referencesReymen, I. (2001). Improving design processes through structured reflection: A domainindependent approach (Vol. 31). Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.spa
dc.relation.referencesRittel, H. W. (1987). The Reasoning of Designers. IGPspa
dc.relation.referencesRittel, H. W. J. & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.spa
dc.relation.referencesRizzo, F. et al. (2016). Human Smart Cities: Rethinking the Interplay Between Design and Planning. Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, L. & Peralta, C. (2014). From Product to Service Design: A Thinking Paradigm Shift. FORMakademisk - Research Journal for Design and Design Education, 7(3). https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/formakademisk/article/view/801/1117spa
dc.relation.referencesRyan, A. & Leung, M., 2014. Systemic Design: Two Canadian Case Studies. FOR Makademisk-research journal for design and design education, 7(3).spa
dc.relation.referencesRyan, A. (2014). A Framework for Systemic Design. Form Akademisk - Research Journal for Design and Design Education, 7(4).spa
dc.relation.referencesSanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts Publication, 4(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068spa
dc.relation.referencesSanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183spa
dc.relation.referencesSanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2016). Convivial toolbox. Generative research for the front end of design. Ohio: BIS Publisherspa
dc.relation.referencesSarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesSarasvathy, S. D., & Venkataraman, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship as Method: Open Questions for an Entrepreneurship Future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 113-135.spa
dc.relation.referencesSarasvathy, S.D., 2004. The questions we ask and the questions we care about: Reformulating some problems in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), pp.707-717.spa
dc.relation.referencesSarasvathy, S. (2012). The entrepreneurial firm. In Handbook on Organisational Entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesSargent, P. (1994). Design science or nonscience. Design Studies, 15(4), 389-402.spa
dc.relation.referencesSawyer, K. R. (2006). Explaining Creativity - The Science if Human Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-1750(88)90050-4spa
dc.relation.referencesSawyer, K. R. (2006). Explaining Creativity - The Science if Human Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-1750(88)90050-4spa
dc.relation.referencesSawyer, R. K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development (translation of second German edition by Redvers Opie). Cambridge, MA, Harvard Universityspa
dc.relation.referencesScott, J. & Carrington, P. J. (2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesSelden, P.D. & Fletcher, D.E. (2015). The Entrepreneurial Journey as an Emergent Hierarchical System of Artifact-Creating Processes. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 603-615.spa
dc.relation.referencesSevaldson, B. (2005). Developing Digital Design Techniques. Oslo: Oslo School of Architecture and Design.spa
dc.relation.referencesSevaldson, B. (2008). Rich Design Research Space. FORMakademisk - Research Journal for Design and Design Education, 1(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesSevaldson, B. (2009). Why should we and how can we make the design process more complex. Fremtid Formes/Shaping Futures. Oslo: Oslo School of Architecture and Design.spa
dc.relation.referencesSevaldson, B. (2010). Discussions & Movements in Design Research. A Systems Approach to Practice Research in Design. Form Akademisk, 3(1), 8-35.spa
dc.relation.referencesShane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.spa
dc.relation.referencesSimon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesSimonton, D. K. (2012). Fields, domains, and individuals. In M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 67-86). Davis, California: Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00004-5spa
dc.relation.referencesSkyttner, L. (2005). General Systems Theory: Problems, Perspectives, Practice. World Scientific.spa
dc.relation.referencesStake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesSternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A. y Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la Teoría Fundamentada. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia.spa
dc.relation.referencesTansley, A.G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284-307.spa
dc.relation.referencesTimmons, J. A. (1989). The Entrepreneurial Mind. Brick House Publishing Co., 3 Main St., PO Box 512, Andover, MA (clothbound: ISBN-0-931790-84-0; paperback: ISBN-0- 931790-85-9,).spa
dc.relation.referencesValdez, J. (2005). The Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Toward a Theory of New Business Formation. Small Business Institute Director's Association.spa
dc.relation.referencesValdez, J., 2000. The entrepreneurship ecosystem: toward a theory of new business formation. Small Business Institute Directors.spa
dc.relation.referencesVenkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 3(1), 119-138.spa
dc.relation.referencesWasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWenger, E. (2001). Comunidades de práctica: aprendizaje, significado e identidad. Barcelona, Buenos Aires, México: Paidós.spa
dc.relation.referencesWinograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Boston: Addison-Wesley.spa
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoung, J.G. (1985). “What is creativity?”, Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 77-87.spa
dc.relation.referencesZampetakis, L. A. & Moustakis, V. (2006). Linking creativity with entrepreneurial intentions: A structural approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(3), 413-428.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.subject.proposalEntrepreneurship ecosystemseng
dc.subject.proposalModelling ecosystemseng
dc.subject.proposalComplex adaptive systemseng
dc.subject.proposalAgentseng
dc.subject.proposalSystemic designeng
dc.subject.proposalEntrepreneurshipeng
dc.subject.unescoDiseño de sistemas
dc.subject.unescoDiseño
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cfspa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor(a) en Diseño y Creaciónspa
dc.publisher.programDoctorado en Diseño y Creaciónspa
dc.description.researchgroupGestión y Transmisión del Conocimientospa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cfspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem