Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


Multidisciplinary co-exploration in the pre-design phase of assistive technologies. A case study

dc.contributor.advisorGallego Gómez, Juan Diego
dc.contributor.authorQuintero Guerrero, Christian David
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-09T21:58:12Z
dc.date.available2022-02-09T21:58:12Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/17388
dc.descriptionIlustraciones, gráficas, fotografíasspa
dc.description.abstractspa:Esta investigación tiene como objetivo caracterizar la co-exploración multidisciplinaria en la fase de prediseño, la cual favorece la toma de decisiones en la identificación de problemas orientados al desarrollo de tecnologías de apoyo para discapacidad motora, al establecer la forma como se construye el sentido colectivo centrado en siete participantes de diferentes disciplinas (medicina, psicología, ingeniería y diseño), el usuario, un interesado y el investigador. La metodología propuesta es de tipo cualitativo - interpretativo con perspectiva narrativa de tópicos, puesto que la intención es analizar el grado de interacción del grupo a través de un proceso de co-diseño. Para describir esas formas intersubjetivas en la toma de decisiones para la identificación de problemas de una persona en situación de discapacidad motora, se diseñó un estudio de tres etapas. La primera, recurrió a la recolección de datos por medio de sondas culturales para explorar cómo se relacionan los saberes y experiencias que se manifiestan en la fase de prediseño. En la segunda, se propuso situar esos saberes y experiencias hacia una construcción de sentido colectivo representado por ideas colectivas resultado de los espacios de co-diseño. Para la última etapa, se implementó un cuestionario con y para el grupo en donde los participantes interpretan las categorías de observación para definir los criterios de diseño que orienta la continuidad del proceso de co-diseño hacia el desarrollo de una tecnología de apoyo que satisfaga las necesidades identificadas desde la persona en situación de discapacidad motora. En tal sentido, una de las conclusiones que sobresale es el grado de contribución equivalente por cada participante en la identificación del problema de diseño, fundamentada por el proceso de co-exploración que se trasformó desde un estado multidisciplinar a un estado interdisciplinar como grupo de diseño.spa
dc.description.abstracteng:This research aims to characterize a multidisciplinary co-exploration in the pre-design phase, which enhances decision-making in problem identification oriented to the development of assistive technologies for motor disabilities, establishing how the collective sense is constructed by seven participants from different disciplines (medicine, psychology, engineering and design), a user, a stakeholder and the researcher. The proposed methodology is qualitative-interpretative with a topical narrative perspective, since the intention is to analyze the degree of group interaction through a co-design process. A three-stage study was designed to describe these intersubjective forms in the decision-making process for the identification of problems of a person with motor disabilities. The first, resorted to data collection by means of cultural probes to explore how the knowledge and experiences that are manifested in the pre-design phase are related. In the second, it was proposed to map knowledge and experiences towards a construction of collective sense represented by collective ideas resulting from the co-design spaces. For the last stage, a survey was implemented with and for the group where the participants interpret the categories of observation to define the design criteria, which guides the continuity of the co-design process towards the development of an assistive technology that meets the needs identified from the person with motor disabilities. In conclusion, the degree of contribution is equivalent for each participant in the identification of the design problem, based on the process of co-exploration that was transformed from a multidisciplinary state to an interdisciplinary state as a design group.eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsResumen/ Abstract / Introducción/ Problemática / Planteamiento del problema/ Objetivos de investigación/ Objetivo general/ Objetivos específicos/ Pregunta de investigación / Pregunta auxiliar/ Hipótesis / Conceptos clave / 1. Revisión de la literatura / 1.1. Reconociendo la discapacidad/ 1.2. Hacia una accesibilidad tecnológica/1.3. La extensión del modelo biopsicosocial con tecnología / 1.4. La experiencia como unidad holística / 1.5. Diseño participativo para las tecnologías de apoyo/ 1.5.1. La práctica del co-diseño/ 1.5.2. Procesos de diseño vinculando usuarios / 1.5.3. La co-exploración en el prediseño/ 1.6. Un enfoque multidisciplinar para la co-exploración / 1.7. Enfoques de -inter- y -trans- disciplinar/ 1.8. Aproximaciones similares en la literatura/ 2. Metodología / 2.1. Descripción del caso de estudio/ 2.1.1. Participantes / 2.1.2. Área del conocimiento en medicina/ 2.1.3. Área del conocimiento en psicología/ 2.1.4. Área del conocimiento en ingeniería / 2.1.5. Área del conocimiento en diseño / 2.1.6. Interesado: Compañero de clase / 2.1.7. Persona-usuario/ 2.2. Selección de caso de estudio/ 2.3. Consideraciones éticas/ 2.3.1. Procedimiento / 2.4. Diseño de la investigación/ 2.5. Recolección de datos / 2.6. Análisis de datos/ 2.7. Procedimiento / 2.7.1. Contextualizando / 2.7.2. Comprendiendo/ 2.7.3. Matriz de auto-interacción estructural / 2.7.4. Matriz de alcanzabilidad / 2.7.5. Partición por niveles/ 2.7.6. Grafo direccional/ 2.7.7. Clasificación por sectores basado en MICMAC/ 2.7.8. Interpretando/ 3. Resultados / 3.1. Lineamientos metodológicos / 3.1.1. Lineamiento Reglas: el conflictos y toma de decisiones/ 3.1.2. Lineamiento Sujeto: conformación de grupo multidisciplinar/ 3.1.3. Lineamiento Comunidad: personas-usuarios con discapacidad e interesados/ 3.1.4. Lineamiento División del trabajo: definición de roles / 3.1.5. Lineamiento Artefacto mediador: sondas culturales / 3.1.6. Lineamiento Objeto: sentido colectivo/ 3.1.7. Relaciones entre lineamientos/ 3.2. Hallazgos / 4. Discusión/ 4.1. Las perspectivas parciales hacia la objetividad desde un conocimiento colectivo /4.2. Construcción de sentido colectivo a partir del diálogo de saberes/ 4.3. Procesos en la toma de decisiones desde la colectividad/ 4.4. Retos y dificultades/ 4.5. Perspectivas posteriores al prediseño / 4.5.1. Reactivación de la mano no dominante / 4.6. Abandono del prototipo en la mano dominante / 4.7. Contribuciones del proyecto de investigación/ 4.8. Contribuciones como difusión del conocimiento/ 5. Conclusiones y futuras investigaciones / 5.1. La construcción de sentido colectivo multidisciplinario/ 5.2. La definición colectiva interdisciplinaria de criterios de diseño / 5.3. Invitación a futuras investigaciones/ Referencias / ANEXOS .spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.titleCo-exploración multidisciplinaria en la fase de prediseño de tecnologías de apoyo. Un caso de estudiospa
dc.titleMultidisciplinary co-exploration in the pre-design phase of assistive technologies. A case studyeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctoradospa
dc.contributor.researchgroupDICOVI: Diseño y Cognición en Entornos Visuales y Virtuales (Categoría A1)spa
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.description.notesEsta tesis fue financiada de forma parcial por la Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, por medio de la comisión de estudios con descarga académica y apoyo económico.spa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad de Caldasspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio institucional Universidad de Caldasspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/spa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Artes y Humanidadesspa
dc.publisher.placeManizalesspa
dc.relation.referencesAgredo-Delgado, V., Ruiz Melenje, P. H., Collazos, C. A., Moreira, F., & Fardoune, H. M. (2020). Catálogo de lineamientos metodológicos para apoyar el proceso de aprendizaje colaborativo. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 21, 16. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.22204spa
dc.relation.referencesAgree, E. M., & Freedman, V. A. (2003). A Comparison of Assistive Technology and Personal Care in Alleviating Disability and Unmet Need. The Gerontologist, 43(3), 335-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/43.3.335spa
dc.relation.referencesAhmadvand, A., Gatchel, R., Brownstein, J., & Nissen, L. (2018). The Biopsychosocial-Digital Approach to Health and Disease: Call for a Paradigm Expansion. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(5), e189. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9732spa
dc.relation.referencesAlexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesAngelini, L., Carrino, S., Abou Khaled, O., Riva-Mossman, S., & Mugellini, E. (2016). Senior Living Lab: An Ecological Approach to Foster Social Innovation in an Ageing Society. Future Internet, 8(4), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi8040050spa
dc.relation.referencesArango Morales, X. A., & Cuevas Pérez, V. A. (2015). Método de análisis estructural: matriz de impactos cruzados multiplicación aplicada a una clasificación (Micmac). Métodos y técnicas cualitativas y cuantitativas aplicables a la investigación en ciencias sociale, 165- 233spa
dc.relation.referencesArlati, S., Spoladore, D., Mottura, S., Zangiacomi, A., Ferrigno, G., Sacchetti, R., & Sacco, M. (2019). Analysis for the design of a novel integrated framework for the return to work of wheelchair users. Work, 61(4), 603-625. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182829spa
dc.relation.referencesArnau Ripollés, M. S., & Toboso Martín, M. (2008). La discapacidad dentro del enfoque de capacidades y funcionamientos de Amartya en [Disability within Amartya en’s capabilities and operations approach]. Araucaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Filosofía, Política y Humanidades, Año 10(20), 64-94.spa
dc.relation.referencesAryana, B., Brewster, L., & Nocera, J. A. (2019). Design for mobile mental health: an exploratory review. Health and Technology, 9(4), 401-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-018-0271- 1spa
dc.relation.referencesAshby, W. R. (1991). Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems. En Facets of Systems Science (pp. 405-417). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1- 4899-0718-9_28spa
dc.relation.referencesAtlas.ti. (2018). Atlas.ti scientific software development GmbH: Qualitative data analysis.spa
dc.relation.referencesBacha, J. A. (2017). Mapping Use, Storytelling, and Experience Design. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(2), 198-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917746708spa
dc.relation.referencesBahler, D., Dupont, C., & Bowen, J. (1995). Mixed quantitative/qualitative method for evaluating compromise solutions to conflicts in collaborative design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering, Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 9(4), 325-336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060400002869spa
dc.relation.referencesBarbosa Ardila, S. D., Villegas Salazar, F., & Beltrán, J. (2020). El modelo médico como generador de discapacidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética, 19(37-2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.18359/rlbi.4303spa
dc.relation.referencesBarthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (Annette Lavers, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang, 137.spa
dc.relation.referencesBenktzon, M. (1993). Designing for our future selves: the Swedish experience. Applied Ergonomics, 24(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(93)90155-3spa
dc.relation.referencesBerger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesBergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Ståhlbrost, A. (2008). Participatory design: one step back or two steps forward? Proceedings of the tenth anniversary conference on participatory design 2008, 102-111spa
dc.relation.referencesBiddiss, E., McPherson, A., Shea, G., & McKeever, P. (2013). The Design and Testing of Interactive Hospital Spaces to Meet the Needs of Waiting Children. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 6(3), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671300600305spa
dc.relation.referencesBixler, A. (2010). Accessibility Through Design. Occupational health & safety (Waco, Tex.), 79(9), 22-24spa
dc.relation.referencesBrandt, E., Binder, T., & Sanders, E. B. N. (2012). Tools and techniques: Ways to engage telling, making and enacting. En J. Simonsen & T. Robertson (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledgespa
dc.relation.referencesBratteteig, T., & Wagner, I. (2014). Disentangling Participation. En R. Harper (Ed.), Disentangling participation; Power and Decision-making in participatory design. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06163-4spa
dc.relation.referencesBratteteig, T., & Wagner, I. (2016). What is a participatory design result? Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference on Full papers - PDC ’16, 1, 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1145/2940299.2940316spa
dc.relation.referencesBurgstahler, . (200 ). Universal Design : Process , Principles , and Applications. DO-IT.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurkhardt, S. (2014). Biopsychosocial Approaches to Understanding Disability: Building Connections: How Teachers Matter. En Special Education International Perspectives: Biopsychosocial, Cultural, and Disability Aspects (Vol. 27, pp. 3-32). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0270-401320140000027001spa
dc.relation.referencesCampbell, J., & Moyers, B. (1991). The Power of Myth. Anchor Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastaneda, L. (2018). A Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde (CIF) – um caminho para a Promoção da Saúde. Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance, 20(2), 229-233. https://doi.org/10.5007/1980- 0037.2018v20n2p229spa
dc.relation.referencesClaes, C., van Hove, G., Vandevelde, S., van Loon, J., & Schalock, R. L. (2010). Person-centered planning: Analysis of research and effectiveness. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48(6), 432-453. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-48.6.432spa
dc.relation.referencesClarke, J., Hall, S., Jefferson, T., & Roberts, B. (1976). Subcultures, Cultures and Class: A theoretical overview. En Resistance Through Rituals (pp. 9-74). Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesCole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. En G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed Cognitions Psychological and Educational Considerations (pp. 23-74). Cambridge University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesCollazos, C. A., Guerrero, L. A., Pino, J. A., & Ochoa, S. F. (2003). Collaborative Scenarios to Promote Positive Interdependence among Group Members. En Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 2806, pp. 356-370). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540- 39850-9_30spa
dc.relation.referencesCollazos, C. A., Padilla-zea, N., Pozzi, F., Guerrero, L. A., Gutierrez, F. L., Collazos, C. A., Padillazea, N., Pozzi, F., & Guerrero, L. A. (2014). Design guidelines to foster cooperation in digital environments. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(3), 375-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.943277spa
dc.relation.referencesCooper, A., Reimann, R., & Cronin, D. (2007). About Face 3: The essentials of interaction design. En Wiley Publishing, Inc. (3.a ed.). Wiley.spa
dc.relation.referencesCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153spa
dc.relation.referencesCortés, E., & Cru , A. (201 ). enerative Design as Tool for ocial nnovation : A Methodological Approach. Back to the Future [icdhs 10th + 1 Conference] Proceedings Book, October, 44-48.spa
dc.relation.referencesCresswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, Third Edition. En Sage (Vol. 66). SAGE Publications, Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesDawood, I., & Underwood, J. (2010). Prioritising Variables of SMEs / Private Sector through Interpretive Structural Model ( ISM ). TG65 & W065 - Special Track 18th CIB World Building Congress, 146-160spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Couvreur, L., & oossens, R. (2011). Design for (every)one : co-creation as a bridge between universal design and rehabilitation engineering. CoDesign, 7(2), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.609890spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Macedo Guimarães, L. B. (2012). Sociotechnical design for a sustainable world. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 13(2), 240-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2011.641230spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Saussure, F. (1966). Course in general linguistics, Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye in Collaboration With Albert Riedlinger. Translated, With an Introd. and Notes by Wade Baskin. McGraw-Hillspa
dc.relation.referencesDebrah, Ralitsa D., de la Harpe, R., & M’Rithaa, M. K. (2017). Design probes and toolkits for healthcare: Identifying information needs in African communities through service design. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S2120-S2134. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352730spa
dc.relation.referencesDebrah, Ralitsa Diana, de la Harpe, R., & M’Rithaa, M. K. (201 ). Exploring design strategies to determine information needs of caregivers. 7th International DEFSA Conference Proceedings, 67-77. https://doi.org/978-1-77012-137-9spa
dc.relation.referencesDeci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The «what» and «why» of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01spa
dc.relation.referencesDesmet, P., & Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 57-66.spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz Velázquez, E. (2009). Reflexiones epistemológicas para una sociología de la discapacidad. Intersticios. Revista sociológica de pensamiento crítico, 3(2), 85-98.spa
dc.relation.referencesDugstad, J., Eide, T., Nilsen, E. R., & Eide, H. (2019). Towards successful digital transformation through co-creation: a longitudinal study of a four-year implementation of digital monitoring technology in residential care for persons with dementia. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 366. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4191-1spa
dc.relation.referencesElbers, S., van Gessel, C., Renes, R. J., van der Lugt, R., Wittink, H., & Hermsen, S. (2021). Innovation in Pain Rehabilitation Using Co-Design Methods During the Development of a 147 Relapse Prevention Intervention: Case Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(1), e18462. https://doi.org/10.2196/18462spa
dc.relation.referencesEngel, G. (1977). The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196(4286), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.847460spa
dc.relation.referencesEngeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining : twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.spa
dc.relation.referencesEngeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. En Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 377-404). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.025spa
dc.relation.referencesFederici, S., Meloni, F., & Borsci, S. (2016). The abandonment of assistive technology in Italy: a survey of National Health Service users. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 52(4), 516-526spa
dc.relation.referencesFindeli, A., Brouillet, D., Martin, S., Moineau, C., & Tarrago, R. (2008). Research Through Design and Transdisciplinarity: A Tentative Contribution to the Methodology of Design Research. En «FOCUSED» — Current Design Research Projects and Methods Swiss Design Network Symposium (pp. 67-91).spa
dc.relation.referencesFine, M., & Asch, A. (1988). Disability Beyond Stigma: Social Interaction, Discrimination, and Activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 4560.1988.tb02045.xspa
dc.relation.referencesFrancis, P., Mellor, D., & Firth, L. (2009). Techniques and Recommendations for the Inclusion of Users with Autism in the Design of Assistive Technologies. Assistive Technology, 21(2), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400430902945561spa
dc.relation.referencesFreeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7spa
dc.relation.referencesFriedman, B., Hendry, D. G., & Borning, A. (2017). A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 11(2), 63-125. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000015spa
dc.relation.referencesFriedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Borning, A., & Huldtgren, A. (2013). Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. En interactions (Vol. 3, Número 6, pp. 55-95). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_4spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Acosta, G., Lange-Morales, K., Puentes Lagos, D. E., & Ruiz Ortiz, M. R. (2011). Addressing human factors and ergonomics in design process, product life cycle, and innovation: Trends in consumer product design. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Consumer Product Design: Methods and Techniques, 133-154.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, V., Rubio, M., & García, G. (2007). Trauma Raquimedular. MEDICRIT Revista de Medicina Crítica, 4(3), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.5413/mrmc.2007.43.89spa
dc.relation.referencesGaver, B., Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235spa
dc.relation.referencesGibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. SAGE Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesGibson, C. B. (2001). From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: cycles of collective cognition in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.84spa
dc.relation.referencesGodet, M. (1986). Introduction to la prospective. Futures, 18(2), 134-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(86)90094-7spa
dc.relation.referencesreenhalgh, T., haw, ., Wherton, J., Hughes, ., Lynch, J., A’Court, C., Hinder, ., ahy, N., Byrne, E., Finlayson, A., Sorell, T., Procter, R., & Stones, R. (2016). SCALS: a fourthgeneration study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context. BMJ Open, 6(2), e010208. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010208spa
dc.relation.referencesGuba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2012). Controversias paradigmáticas, contradicciones y confluencias emergentes. En Paradigmas y perspectivas en disputa. Manual de investigación cualitativa.: Vol. II (pp. 38-78). Editorial Gedisa, S.A.spa
dc.relation.referencesGustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative studyspa
dc.relation.referencesHaraway, D. (2013). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. En Women, Science, and Technology (Vol. 3, Número 3, pp. 489- 506). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203427415-40spa
dc.relation.referencesHassenzahl, M. (2010). Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, 3(1), 1-95. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00261ED1V01Y201003HCI008spa
dc.relation.referencesHassenzahl, M., Eckoldt, K., Diefenbach, S., Laschke, M., Lenz, E., & Kim, J. (2013). Designing moments of meaning and pleasure. Experience design and happiness. International Journal of Design, 7(3), 21-31.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Interamericana editores.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. del P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6.a ed.). McGraw-Hill.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoward, J., Fisher, Z., Kemp, A. H., Lindsay, S., Tasker, L. H., & Tree, J. J. (2020). Exploring the barriers to using assistive technology for individuals with chronic conditions: a metasynthesis review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1788181spa
dc.relation.referencesHsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687spa
dc.relation.referencesImrie, R. (2004). Demystifying disability: a review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Sociology of Health & iIlness, 26(3), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00391.xspa
dc.relation.referencesISO. (2016). ISO - ISO 13485 — Medical devices. https://www.iso.org/iso-13485-medicaldevices.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesJiménez Lara, A. (2007). Conceptos y tipologías de la discapacidad. Documentos y normativas de clasificación más relevantes. En R. de Lorenzo & L. Pérez, Cayo (Eds.), Tratado sobre discapacidad (Aranzadi, pp. 177-205)spa
dc.relation.referencesJohn, C. (2015). What is co-design? | Design for Europe. Design for Europe. http://designforeurope.eu/what-co-designspa
dc.relation.referencesJones, J., & Pal, J. (2015). Counteracting Dampeners: Understanding technologyamplified capabilities of people with disabilities in Sierra Leone. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 15, 6:1--6:10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2737856.2738025spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, P. (2018). Contexts of Co-creation: Designing with System Stakeholders (pp. 3-52). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8_1spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, P. H. (2014). Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems. En G. S. Metcalf (Ed.), Social Systems and Design (pp. 91-128). Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54478-4_4spa
dc.relation.referencesKalpokaite, N., & Radivojevic, I. (2019). Best Practice Article: Analyzing Code Frequencies with ATLAS.ti 8 Windows & Mac: The Code-Document Table. https://atlasti.com/2019/01/11/analyzing-code-frequencies-with-atlas-ti-8-windows-macthe-code-document-table/spa
dc.relation.referencesKaradayi-Usta, S. (2020). An Interpretive Structural Analysis for Industry 4.0 Adoption Challenges. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 973-978. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2890443spa
dc.relation.referencesKinnear, T. C., & Taylor, J. W. (1989). Investigación de mercados: un enfoque aplicado. McGrawHill.spa
dc.relation.referencesKleinsmann, M. S. (2006). Understanding collaborative design. Delft University of Technology.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrippendorff, K. (1989). On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the Proposition That «Design Is Making Sense (Of Things)». Design Issues, 5(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511512spa
dc.relation.referencesLarsson Ranada, Å., & Lidström, H. (2019). Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the service delivery process—A systematic review. Assistive Technology, 31(2), 82-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2017.1367737spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, Y. (2008). Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the codesign process. CoDesign, 4(1), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875613spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, G., Kou, G., & Peng, Y. (2018). A Group Decision Making Model for Integrating Heterogeneous Information. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 48(6), 982- 992. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2016.2627050spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, J., Zhang, J., Ge, W., & Liu, X. (2004). Multi-scale methodology for complex systems. Chemical Engineering Science, 59(8-9), 1687-1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.01.025spa
dc.relation.referencesLuborsky, M. R. (1993). Sociocultural Factors Shaping Technology Usage: Fulfilling the Promise. Technology and disability, 2(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-1993-2110spa
dc.relation.referencesLyle O’Brien, C., O’Brien, J., & Mount, B. (1 7). Person-Centered Planning Has Arrived … or Has It? Mental Retardation, 35(6), 480-484. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047- 6765(1997)035<0480:PPHAOH>2.0.CO;2spa
dc.relation.referencesMaldonado, S. (2005). ¿Exclusión o discriminación?: el caso de las personas con discapacidad en el mercado laboral peruano. Observatorio de la Economía Latinoamericana, 3, 47.spa
dc.relation.referencesMalinverni, L., Schaper, M.-M., & Pares, N. (2019). Multimodal methodological approach for participatory design of Full-Body Interaction Learning Environments. Qualitative Research, 19(1), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118773299spa
dc.relation.referencesMansell, J., & Beadle-Brown, J. (2004). Person-centred planning or person-centred action? A response to the commentaries. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(1), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00176.xspa
dc.relation.referencesManzini, E. (2015a). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. En MIT press. The MIT Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesManzini, E. (2015b). Design in the transition phase: a new design culture for the emerging design. Design Philosophy Papers, 13(1), 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085683spa
dc.relation.referencesMargolin, V. (2007). Design for development: towards a history. Design Studies, 28(2), 111-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.11.008spa
dc.relation.referencesMargolin, V., & Margolin, S. (2002). A «Social Model» of Design: Issues of Practice and Research. Design Issues, 18(4).spa
dc.relation.referencesMattelmäki, T. (2006). Design Probes. University of Art and Design Helsinki.spa
dc.relation.referencesMattelmäki, T. (2008). Probing for co-exploring. CoDesign, 4(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875027spa
dc.relation.referencesMax-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014spa
dc.relation.referencesMcCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. interactions, 11(5), 42. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015549spa
dc.relation.referencesMcCarthy, J., Wright, P., Wallace, J., & Dearden, A. (2006). The experience of enchantment in human–computer interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10(6), 369-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0055-2spa
dc.relation.referencesMcLellan, H. (2000). Experience Design. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493100316238spa
dc.relation.referencesMeskó, B., Radó, N., & yőrffy, Z. (201 ). Opinion leader empowered patients about the era of digital health: a qualitative study. BMJ Open, 9(3), e025267. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025267spa
dc.relation.referencesMeyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Gellatly, I. R. (1990). Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 710-720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021- 9010.75.6.710spa
dc.relation.referencesMichener, W. K., Allard, S., Budden, A., Cook, R. B., Douglass, K., Frame, M., Kelling, S., Koskela, R., Tenopir, C., & Vieglais, D. A. (2012). Participatory design of DataONE—Enabling cyberinfrastructure for the biological and environmental sciences. Ecological Informatics, 11, 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.08.007spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Salud y Protección Social. (2020). DisCAPACIDAD. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/proteccionsocial/Paginas/DisCAPACIDAD.aspxspa
dc.relation.referencesMoran, J. (2002). Interdisciplinarity (1.a ed.). Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoreno, J. L., & Jennings, H. H. (1938). Statistics of Social Configurations. Sociometry, 1(3/4), 342. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785588spa
dc.relation.referencesMosleh, W. S., & Larsen, H. (2020). Exploring the complexity of participation. CoDesign, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1789172spa
dc.relation.referencesMurphy, R., & Jones, P. (2020). Leverage analysis. FormAkademisk - forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk, 13(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.3384spa
dc.relation.referencesNaciones Unidas Asamblea. (2006). Convención sobre los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. En Asamblea General de Naciones Unidas (pp. 1-30). Naciones Unidas Asambleaspa
dc.relation.referencesNasr, N., Leon, B., Mountain, G., Nijenhuis, S. M., Prange, G., Sale, P., & Amirabdollahian, F. (2016). The experience of living with stroke and using technology: opportunities to engage and co-design with end users. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 11(8), 653-660. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2015.1036469spa
dc.relation.referencesNewman, M. E. J. (2011). Complex Systems: A Survey. American Journal of Physics, 79(8), 800- 810. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3590372spa
dc.relation.referencesNielsen, J. (1992). The usability engineering life cycle. Computer, 25(3), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.121503spa
dc.relation.referencesNorman, D. A. (2004). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. En Basic Books (Número 1). Basic Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesNorman, D. A., & Stappers, P. J. (2015). DesignX: Complex Sociotechnical Systems. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1(2), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.002spa
dc.relation.referencesNorman, D., & Draper, S. (1986). User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on HumanComputer Interaction.spa
dc.relation.referencesOliva, R. (2004). Model structure analysis through graph theory: partition heuristics and feedback structure decomposition. System Dynamics Review, 20(4), 313-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.298spa
dc.relation.referencesOMS. (2001). Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud. Publicaciones de la Organización Mundial de la Salud, 1-288. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pep.0000245823.21888.71spa
dc.relation.referencesOosterlaken, I. (2009). Design for Development: A Capability Approach. Design Issues, 25(4), 91- 102. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2009.25.4.91spa
dc.relation.referencesOosterlaken, I., & Hoven, J. van den. (2012). The Capability Approach, Technology and Design (Vol. 5). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3879-9spa
dc.relation.referencesOpsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32(3), 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006spa
dc.relation.referencesOttino, J. M. (2003). Complex systems. AIChE Journal, 49(2), 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690490202spa
dc.relation.referencesPapanek, V. (1985). Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change (2.a ed.). Thames & Hudson Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesPatil, G. P. (2014). Weighted Distributions. En Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online (pp. 1- 11). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat07359spa
dc.relation.referencesPérez Dalmeda, M. E., & Chhabra, G. (2019). Modelos teóricos de discapacidad: un seguimiento del desarrollo histórico del concepto de discapacidad en las últimas cinco décadas. Revista Española de Discapacidad, 7(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.5569/2340- 5104.07.01.01spa
dc.relation.referencesPersson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A. A., & Gulliksen, J. (2015). Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(4), 505-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0358-zspa
dc.relation.referencesPfisterer, K. J., Boger, J., & Wong, A. (2019). Prototyping the Automated Food Imaging and Nutrient Intake Tracking System: Modified Participatory Iterative Design Sprint. JMIR Human Factors, 6(2), e13017. https://doi.org/10.2196/13017spa
dc.relation.referencesPhillips, B., & Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of Assistive Technology Abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1993.10132205spa
dc.relation.referencesPine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard business review, 76(4), 97-105spa
dc.relation.referencesPirkl, J. J. (1 ). Transgenerational design : products for an aging population.spa
dc.relation.referencesPress, M., & Cooper, R. (2003). The Design Experience. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315240329spa
dc.relation.referencesPressman, R. S. (2005). Software engineering: a practitioner’s approach (7.a ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, C. (2020). A review: accessible technology through participatory design. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1785564spa
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, C., & Gallego, J. (2020). Interdisciplinary Co-Design Process of Assistive Technology in Value Elicitation. 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439231.3439234spa
dc.relation.referencesRade, K. A., Pharande, V. A., & Saini, D. R. (2017). Interpretive Structural Modeling ( ISM ) for Recovery of Heat Energy. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 12(1), 83-92.spa
dc.relation.referencesRiemer-Reiss, M. L., & Wacker, R. R. (2000). Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(3), 44-50.spa
dc.relation.referencesRios, A., Miguel Cruz, A., Guarín, M. R., & Caycedo Villarraga, P. S. (2014). What factors are associated with the provision of assistive technologies: the Bogotá D.C. case. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9(5), 432-444. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2014.936053spa
dc.relation.referencesRobertson, T., & Wagner, I. (2013). Ethics: engagement, representation and politics-in-action. En Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design (pp. 84-105). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108543-11spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez Díaz, S., & Ferreira, M. A. V. (2010). Desde la dis-capacidad hacia la diversidad funcional. Un ejercicio de dis-normalización. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 68(2), 289-309. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2008.05.22spa
dc.relation.referencesRuiz, M. B. R., & Díaz, A. L. A. (2003). ESTRATEGIAS DE AFRONTAMIENTO Y PROCESO DE ADAPTACIÓN A LA LESIÓN MEDULARspa
dc.relation.referencesRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020spa
dc.relation.referencesSaid Valbuena B, W., Montoya Carvajal, A., & Fernanda Pinzon, L. (2020). From a ludic Loom of Ideas to the Spiral of Intercultural Co-creation. Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1, 1, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385022spa
dc.relation.referencesSalcedo, A. S. (2006). PONENCIA XV JORNADAS EUBD. Tecnología de apoyo y sociedad de la información. Proyectos europeos. Revista General de Información y Documentación, 16(1), 51-63.spa
dc.relation.referencesSanders, E. B.-N. (2000). Generative Tools for Co-designing. En S. A. R. Scrivener, L. J. Ball, & A. Woodcock (Eds.), Collaborative Design (pp. 3-12). Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0779-8_1spa
dc.relation.referencesSanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183spa
dc.relation.referencesSanders, Elizabeth B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068spa
dc.relation.referencesSanti, M. F. (2015). Vulnerabilidad y ética de la investigación social: perspectivas actuales. Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética, 15(29-2), 52. https://doi.org/10.18359/rlbi.535spa
dc.relation.referencesSarmiento Pelayo, M. P. (2015). Co-design: A central approach to the inclusion of people with disabilities. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, 63, 149-154. https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v63n3sup.49345spa
dc.relation.referencesScaife, M., Rogers, Y., Aldrich, F., & Davies, M. (1997). Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems, 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258789spa
dc.relation.referencesScherer, M. J. (1996). Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disability and Rehabilitation, 18(9), 439-448. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289609165907spa
dc.relation.referencesScherer, M. J. (2015). Assistive Technology and Persons With Disabilities. En M. A. Stebnicki & I. Marini (Eds.), The Professional Counselor’s Desk Reference (pp. 475–481). Springer Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826171825.0074spa
dc.relation.referencesScherer, M. J. (2020). It is time for the biopsychosocialtech model. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(4), 363-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1752319spa
dc.relation.referencesScherer, M. J., & Lane, J. P. (1 7). Assessing consumer profiles of ‘ideal’ assistive technologies in ten categories: An integration of quantitative and qualitative methods. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19(12), 528-535. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289709166046spa
dc.relation.referencesSchwarzkopf, E. (2013). Accessibility Through Design.spa
dc.relation.referencesSharma, V., Grover, S., & Sharma, S. K. (2017). Analyzing the barriers affecting the effective utilization of quality tools and techniques using integrated ISM approach. Management Science Letters, 7(11), 525-540. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2017.8.003spa
dc.relation.referencesShedroff, N. (2009). Experience Design 1.1. En Nathan Shedroff. Experience Design Booksspa
dc.relation.referencesSilveira-Maia, M., Lopes-dos-Santos, P., Sanches-Ferreira, M., Alves, S., & Silveira-Maia, C. (2019). The use of the international classification of functioning, disability and health in an interactive perspective: the assessment and intervention of students’ additional support needs in Portugal. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(25), 3016-3024. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1483433spa
dc.relation.referencesSingh, B. P., & Das, U. D. (2020). Some Statistical Properties of a Weighted Distribution and Its Application to Waiting Time Data. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 9(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2020/v9i130216spa
dc.relation.referencesSistema Integrado de Información de la Protección Social – SISPRO. (2020). Observatorio Discapacidad. http://rssvr2.sispro.gov.co/ObservatorioDiscapacidad/spa
dc.relation.referencesSpan, M., Smits, C., Groen-van de ven, L., Jukema, J., Hettinga, M., Cremers, A., VernooijDassen, M., & Eefsting, J. (2014). Towards an interactive web tool that supports shared 156 decision making in dementia: Identifying user requirements. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, 6(3-4), 338-349.spa
dc.relation.referencesStory, M. F. (1998). Maximizing Usability: The Principles of Universal Design. Assistive Technology, 10(1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1998.10131955spa
dc.relation.referencesSuchman, L. (2002). Located Accountabilities in Technology Production. Scand. J. Inf. Syst., 14(2), 91–105.spa
dc.relation.referencesSushil. (2012). Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-012-0008-3spa
dc.relation.referencesTaffe, S. (2015). The hybrid designer/end-user: Revealing paradoxes in co-design. Design Studies, 40, 39-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.06.003spa
dc.relation.referencesTamayo y Tamayo, M. (2011). La interdisciplinariedad [Interdisciplinarity]. Cartillas para el Docente ICESI; No.12, 18.spa
dc.relation.referencesTimmins, ., O’rourke, P., Bagnasco, A., Timmins, B., Ekins, R., Long, ., Aleo, ., & asso, L. (2017). Using videoed workshops in interdisciplinary research with people who have disabilities. Nurse Researcher, 25(2), 24-28. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2017.e1481spa
dc.relation.referencesTsatsou, P. (2020). Is digital inclusion fighting disability stigma? Opportunities, barriers, and recommendations. Disability & Society, 0(0), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1749563spa
dc.relation.referencesVelarde Lizama, V. (2016). Los modelos de la discapacidad: un recorrido histórico [The models of disability: a historical journey.]. Revista empresa y humanismo, XV(1), 115-136.spa
dc.relation.referencesVerza, R., Carvalho, M. L. L., Battaglia, M. A., & Uccelli, M. M. (2006). An interdisciplinary approach to evaluating the need for assistive technology reduces equipment abandonment. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 12(1), 88-93. https://doi.org/10.1191/1352458506ms1233oaspa
dc.relation.referencesVinodh, S., Ramesh, K., & Arun, C. S. (2016). Application of interpretive structural modelling for analysing the factors influencing integrated lean sustainable system. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18(2), 413-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1025-7spa
dc.relation.referencesWaldschmidt, A., Berressem, H., & Ingwersen, M. (2017). Culture-theory-disability: Encounters between disability studies and cultural studies. En A. Waldschmidt, H. Berressem, & M. Ingwersen (Eds.), Culture - Theory - Disability. transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839425336spa
dc.relation.referencesWarfield, J. N. (1974a). Developing Subsystem Matrices in Structural Modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-4(1), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1974.5408523spa
dc.relation.referencesWarfield, J. N. (1974b). Toward Interpretation of Complex Structural Models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 4(5), 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1974.4309336spa
dc.relation.referencesWasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWaters, R. L., Adkins, R. H., & Yakura, J. S. (1991). Definition of complete spinal cord injury. Paraplegia, 29(9), 573-581. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1991.85spa
dc.relation.referencesWittich, W., Granberg, S., Wahlqvist, M., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Mäki-Torkko, E. (2021). Device abandonment in deafblindness: a scoping review of the intersection of functionality and usability through the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health lens. BMJ Open, 11(1), e044873. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044873spa
dc.relation.referencesWoodbury, E. Z. (2013). Auto-mobile: Disabled Drivers in New Zealand (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy). University of Otago.spa
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organization. (2011). World report on disabilityspa
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organization. (2018). Disability and rehabilitation Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology (GATE). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/phi/implementation/assistive_technology/phi_gate/en/spa
dc.relation.referencesYen, W.-T., Flinn, S. R., Sommerich, C. M., Lavender, S. A., & Sanders, E. B.-N. (2013). Preference of lid design characteristics by older adults with limited hand function. Journal of Hand Therapy, 26(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2013.04.002spa
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the Future of the Case Study. Method in Evaluation Research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409401500309spa
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Reserach - Design and Methods. En SAGE (Vol. 5).spa
dc.relation.referencesZamenopoulos, T., & Katerina, A. (2018). Co-Design as Collaborative Research. En Connected Communities Foundation Seriesspa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Z., Guo, C., & Martinez, L. (2017). Managing Multigranular Linguistic Distribution Assessments in Large-Scale Multiattribute Group Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 47(11), 3063-3076. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2016.2560521spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.subject.lembDiseño
dc.subject.lembTecnología
dc.subject.proposalCo-exploraciónspa
dc.subject.proposalMultidisciplinariospa
dc.subject.proposalDiscapacidadspa
dc.subject.proposalSentido colectivospa
dc.subject.proposalCo-diseñospa
dc.subject.proposalCo-explorationeng
dc.subject.proposalMultidisciplinaryeng
dc.subject.proposalDisabilityeng
dc.subject.proposalCollective senseeng
dc.subject.proposalCo-designeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TDspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbspa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor(a) en Diseño y Creaciónspa
dc.publisher.programDoctorado en Diseño y Creaciónspa
dc.description.researchgroupDiseño y Desarrollo de Productos Interactivosspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem