Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

The global importance of forestry plantations and pastures on endemic herpetofauna: a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.advisorRamírez Chaves, Héctor Emilio
dc.contributor.advisorLópez-Bedoya, Pablo Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorCardona Galvis, Erika Alejandra
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T13:09:13Z
dc.date.available2022-04-01
dc.date.available2021-12-10T13:09:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-09
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/17242
dc.descriptionIlustraciones, mapasspa
dc.description.abstractspa:Las plantaciones forestales y pasturas están muy extendidos en todo el mundo, debido a su importancia económica para la producción de madera y la ganadería, respectivamente. En consecuencia, el área de bosques naturales está disminuyendo a un ritmo sin precedentes generando una pérdida acelerada de biodiversidad. Por lo tanto, comprender el impacto ecológico de las plantaciones forestales y pasturas es de vital importancia para la conservación. En particular, los anfibios y reptiles son grupos taxonómicos clave que tienen una atención de investigación limitada. Realizamos un metaanálisis de 49 artículos para determinar el efecto de las plantaciones forestales y pasturas sobre la herpetofauna endémica, debido a su sensibilidad a los cambios ambientales y su importante papel en el ecosistema. Evaluamos si los efectos sobre la herpetofauna endémica dependen de i) el grupo taxonómico y ii) el manejo de las plantaciones forestales (es decir, origen, composición, propósito). Encontramos que las plantaciones forestales y pasturas afectan negativamente la presencia de los taxones endémicos evaluados en comparación con los bosques naturales; sin embargo, el efecto es menos severo en las plantaciones forestales en comparación con las pasturas. Además, encontramos diferentes respuestas entre grupos taxonómicos en plantaciones forestales, siendo los anfibios el grupo más afectado. Las plantaciones nativas y mixtas, junto con las vinculadas a bosques naturales, mostraron un efecto neutro o levemente positivo sobre la presencia de herpetofauna endémica en comparación con las plantaciones exóticas o de una sola especie que se encontraban alejadas de los bosques naturales. Reducir la conversión de bosques naturales en plantaciones forestales y pasturas, y desarrollar planes de manejo sostenibles para las plantaciones ayudará a recuperar hábitats adecuados para conservar la biodiversidad endémica.spa
dc.description.abstracteng:Forestry plantations and pastures are globally widespread, due to their economic importance for timber production and livestock, respectively. Consequently, the area of natural forests is decreasing at an unprecedented rate generating an accelerated loss of biodiversity. Understanding the ecological impact of forestry plantations and pastures is thus critically important for conservation. In particular, amphibians and reptiles, are key taxonomic groups which have limited research attention. We conducted a meta-analysis of 49 studies to determine the effect of forestry plantations and pastures on endemic herpetofauna, due to their sensitivity to environmental changes and their important role in the ecosystem. We evaluated whether the effects on endemic herpetofauna depend on i) the taxonomic group and ii) the management of the forestry plantations (i.e., origin, composition, purpose). We found that forestry plantations and pastures negatively affect the presence of endemic taxa evaluated compared to natural forests; however, the effect is less severe in forestry plantations compared to pastures. In addition, we found different responses between taxonomic groups in forestry plantations, with amphibians being the most affected group. Native and mixed plantations, along with those connected to natural forests showed a neutral or slightly positive effect on the presence of endemic herpetofauna compared to exotic or single species plantations which were far from natural forests. Reducing the conversion of natural forests to forestry plantations and pastures, and developing sustainables management plans for plantations will help to recover suitable habitats to conserve of endemic biodiversity.eng
dc.description.tableofcontents1.1 Introduction / 1.2 Materials and methods / 1.2.2 Literature search and inclusion criteria / 1.2.3 Effect size calculation / 1.2.4 Global effect and moderator variables / 1.2.5 Statistical analysis / 1.2.6 Publication bias / 1.3 Results / 1.3.1 Overview database / 1.3.2 General response of endemic herpetofauna / 1.3.3 Effects of the taxonomic group and the origin of forestry plantations / 1.3.4 Effects of management characteristics / 1.3.5 Publication bias / 1.4 Discussion / 1.4.1 General response of endemic herpetofauna to forestry plantations and pastures / 1.4.2 Effects of forestry plantations on taxonomic groups / 1.4.3 Effects of the origin of forestry plantations / 1.4.4 Effects of management characteristics / 1.5 Conclusions and management options / 1.6 Acknowledgements / 1.7 Appendix / 1.7.1 Appendix A / 1.8 Referenceseng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.titleThe global importance of forestry plantations and pastures on endemic herpetofauna: a systematic review and meta-analysiseng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Pregradospa
dc.description.degreelevelUniversitariospa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad de Caldasspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad de Caldasspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.cospa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturalesspa
dc.publisher.placeManizalesspa
dc.relation.referencesAbrahamczyk, S., Kessler, M., Putra, D.D., Waltert, M., Tscharntke, T. 2008. The value of differently managed cacao plantations for forest bird conservation in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Bird Conserv. Int. 18, 349–362.spa
dc.relation.referencesAngarita-M, O., Montes-Correa, A.C., Renjifo, J.M. 2015. Amphibians and reptiles of an agroforestry system in the Colombian Caribbean. Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 8, 33–52.spa
dc.relation.referencesArredondo-Núñez, A., Badano, E., Bustamante, R. 2009. How beneficial are nurse plants? A meta-analysis of the effects of cushion plants on high-Andean plant communities. Community Ecol. 10, 1–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesArroyo‐Rodríguez, V., Fahrig, L., Tabarelli, M., Watling, J.I., Tischendorf, L., Benchimol, M., Cazetta, E., Faria, D., Leal, I.R., Melo, F.P.L. Morante-Filho, J.C., Santos, B.A., Arasa-Gisbert, R., Arce-Peña, N., Cervantes-López, M.J., Cudney-Valenzuela, S., GalánAcedo, C., San-José, M., Vieira, I.C.G., Slik, J.W.F., Nowakowski, A.J., Tscharntke, T. 2020. Designing optimal human‐modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservation. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1404–1420.spa
dc.relation.referencesBalthazar, V., Vanacker, V., Molina, A., Lambin, E.F. 2015. Impacts of forest cover change on ecosystem services in high Andean mountains. Ecol. Indic. 48, 63–75.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarlow, J., Gardner, T.A., Araujo, I.S., Avila-Pires, T.C., Bonaldo, A.B., Costa, J.E., Esposito, M.C., Ferreira, L.V., Hawes, J., Hernandez, M.M., Hoogmoed, M.S., Leite, R.N., Lo-Man-Hung, N.F., Malcolm, J.R., Martins, M.B., Mestre, L.A.M., MirandaSantos, R., Nunes-Gutjahr, A.L., Overal, W.L., Parry, L., Peters, S.L., Ribeiro-Junior, M.A., da Silva, M.N.F., Motta, C.D., Peres, C.A. 2007. Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 18555–18560.spa
dc.relation.referencesBasham, E.W., González del Pliego, P., Acosta‐Galvis, A.R., Woodcock, P., MedinaUribe, C.A., Haugaasen, T., Gilroy, J.J., Edwards, D.P. 2016. Quantifying carbon and amphibian co‐benefits from secondary forest regeneration in the Tropical Andes. Anim. Conserv. 19, 548–560.spa
dc.relation.referencesBetts, M.G., Wolf, C., Pfeifer, M., Banks-Leite, C., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Ribeiro, D.B., Barlow, J., Eigenbrod, F., Faria, D., Fletcher, R.J., Hadley, A.S., Hawes, J.E., Holt, R.D., Klingbeil, B., Kormann, U., Lens, L., Levi1, T., Guido F. Medina-Rangel, G.F., Melles, S.L., Mezger, D., Morante-Filho, J.C., Orme, C.D.L., Peres, C.A., Phalan, B.T., Pidgeon, A., Possingham, H., Ripple, W.J., Slade, E.M., Somarriba, E., Tobias, J.A., Tylianakis, J.M., Urbina-Cardona, J.N., Valente, J.J., Watling, J.I., Wells, K., Wearn, O.R., Wood, E., Young, R., Ewers, R.M. 2019. Extinction filters mediate the global effects of habitat fragmentation on animals. Science. 366, 1236–1239.spa
dc.relation.referencesBitar, Y.O.C., Juen. L., Pinheiro, L.C., dos Santos-Costa, M.C.D. 2015. Anuran beta diversity in a mosaic anthropogenic landscape in transitional Amazon. J. Herpetol. 49,75– 82.spa
dc.relation.referencesBraun, A.C., Troeger, D., Garcia, R., Aguayo, M., Barra, R., Vogt, J. 2017. Assessing the impact of plantation forestry on plant biodiversity. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 10, 159–172spa
dc.relation.referencesBrooks, T.M., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Da Fonseca, G.A., Rylands, A.B., Konstant, W.R., Flick, P., Pilgrim, J., Oldfield, S., Magin, G., Hilton-Taylor, C. 2002. Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 16, 909–923.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrum, F.T., Gonçalves, L.O., Cappletti, L., Carlucci, M.B., Debastian, V.J., Salengue, E.V., Seger, G.D.D.S. Both, C., Bernardo-Silva, J.S., Dias, R.L., da Silva Duarte, L. 2013. Land use explains the distribution of threatened New World amphibians better than climate. PLoS ONE. 8, e60742.spa
dc.relation.referencesBohada‐Murillo, M., Castaño‐Villa, G.J., Fonturbel, F.E. 2020. The effects of forestry and agroforestry plantations on bird diversity: A global synthesis. Land Degrad. Dev. 31, 646– 654.spa
dc.relation.referencesBöhm, M., Collen, B., Baillie, J.E.M., Bowles, P., Chanson, J., Cox, N., Hammerson, G., Hoffmann, M., Livingstone, S. R., Ram, M., Rhodin, A.G.J., Stuart, S.N., van Dijk, P.P., Young, B. E., Afuang, L.E., Aram, A., García, A., Aguilar, C., …, Zug, G. 2013. The conservation status of the world’s reptiles. Biol. Conserv. 157, 372–385.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J., Rothstein, H.R. 2005. Comprehensive metaanalysis Version 2. Biostat, Englewood, NJ.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T., Rothstein, H.R. 2009. Introduction to metaanalysis. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.spa
dc.relation.referencesBotts, E.A., Erasmus, B.F.N., Alexander, G.J., Lawlor, J. 2013. Small range size and narrow niche breadth predict range contractions in South African frogs. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 567–576.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrockerhoff, E.G., Jactel, H., Parrotta, J.A., Quine, C.P., Sayer, J. 2008. Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodivers. Conserv. 17, 925–951.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrüning, L.Z., Krieger, M., Meneses-Pelayo, E., Eisenhauer, N., Pinilla, M.P.R., Reu, B., Ernst, R. 2018. Land-use heterogeneity by small-scale agriculture promotes amphibian diversity in montane agroforestry systems of northeast Colombia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 264, 15–23.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrüning, L.Z., Krieger, M., Meneses-Pelayo, E., Eisenhauer, N., Pinilla, M.P.R., Reu, B., Ernst, R. 2018. Land-use heterogeneity by small-scale agriculture promotes amphibian diversity in montane agroforestry systems of northeast Colombia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 264, 15–23.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuerki, S., Callmander, M.W., Bachman, S., Moat, J., Labat, J.N., Forest, F. 2015. Incorporating evolutionary history into conservation planning in biodiversity hotspots. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 370, 20140014.spa
dc.relation.referencesBull, G.Q., Bazett, M., Schwab, O., Nilsson, S., White, A., Maginnis, S. 2006. Industrial forest plantation subsidies: Impacts and implications. For. Policy Econ. 9, 13–31.spa
dc.relation.referencesCardinale, B.J., Duffy, J.E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D.U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G.M, Tilman, D., Wardle, D.A, Kinzig, A.P., Daily, G.C., Loreau, M., Grace, J.B., Carvajal-Cogollo, J.E., Urbina-Cardona, N. 2015. Ecological grouping and edge effects in tropical dry forest: reptile-microenvironment relationships. Biodivers. Conserv. 24, 1109–1130.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastaño-Villa, G.J., Estevez, J.V., Guevara, G., Bohada-Murillo, M., Fontúrbel, F.E. 2019 Differential effects of forestry plantations on bird diversity: a global assessment. For. Ecol. Manag. 440, 202–207.spa
dc.relation.referencesCatalán, M., Galindo, M.P., Martín, J., Leiva, V. 2012. Métodos de integración de odds ratio basados en meta-análisis usando modelos de efectos fijos y aleatorios útiles en salud pública. Rev. Colomb. Estad. 35, 205–222.spa
dc.relation.referencesChaudhary, A., Pfister, S., Hellweg, S. 2016. Spatially explicit analysis of biodiversity loss due to global agriculture, pasture and forest land use from a producer and consumer perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 3928–3936.spa
dc.relation.referencesCole, R. J., Holl, K.D., Zahawi, R.A., Wickey, P., Townsend, A.R. 2016. Leaf litter arthropod responses to tropical forest restoration. Ecol. Evol. 6, 5158–5168.spa
dc.relation.referencesCordier, J.M., Aguilar, R., Lescano, J.N., Leynaud, G.C., Bonino, A., Miloch, D., Loyola, R., Nori, J. 2021. A global assessment of amphibian and reptile responses to land-use changes. Biol. Conserv. 253, 108863.spa
dc.relation.referencesCoux, C., Donoso, I., Tylianakis, J.M., García, D., Martínez, D., Dehling, D.M., Stouffer, D. B. 2021. Tricky partners: native plants show stronger interaction preferences than their exotic counterparts. Ecology. 102, e03239.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrane, M.S., Strine, C.T., Knierim, T.K., Artchawakom, T., Suwanwaree, P. 2018. Herpetofaunal species abundance, richness, and diversity in a dry tropical forest and agricultural matrix at the Sakaerat Biosphere Reserve, Thailand. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 13, 586–597.spa
dc.relation.referencesCruz, J., Sarmento, P., Carretero, M.A., White, P.C. 2015. Exotic fish in exotic plantations: a multi-scale approach to understand amphibian occurrence in the Mediterranean region. PloS ONE. 10, e0129891.spa
dc.relation.referencesCruz-Elizalde, R., Berriozabal-Islas, C., Hernández-Salinas, U., Martínez-Morales, M.A., Ramírez-Bautista, A. 2016. Amphibian species richness and diversity in a modified tropical environment of central Mexico. Trop. Ecol. 57, 407–417.spa
dc.relation.referencesda Rocha, P.L.B., Viana, B.F., Cardoso, M.Z., de Melo, A.M.C., Costa, M.G.C., de Vasconcelos, R.N., Dantas, T.B. 2013. What is the value of eucalyptus monocultures for the biodiversity of the Atlantic Forest? A multitaxa study in southern Bahia, Brazil. J. For. Res. 24, 263–272.spa
dc.relation.referencesDevictor, V., Julliard, R., Jiguet, F. 2008. Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos. 117, 507–514.spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-García, J.M., Pineda, E., López-Barrera, F., Moreno, C.E. 2017. Amphibian species and functional diversity as indicators of restoration success in tropical montane forest. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 2569–2589spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-García, J.M., López-Barrera, F., Toledo-Aceves, T., Andresen, E., Pineda, E. 2020. Does forest restoration assist the recovery of threatened species? A study of cloud forest amphibian communities. Biol. Conserv. 242, 108400.spa
dc.relation.referencesDoherty, T.S., Balouch, S., Bell, K., Burns, T.J., Feldman, A., Fist, C., Garvey, T.F., Jessop, T.S., Meiri, S., Driscoll, D.A. 2020. Reptile responses to anthropogenic habitat modification: A global meta‐analysis. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1265–1279.spa
dc.relation.referencesDriscoll, D.A., Banks, S.C., Barton, P.S., Lindenmayer, D.B., Smith, A.L. 2013. Conceptual domain of the matrix in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 605– 613.spa
dc.relation.referencesDuval, S., Tweedie, R. 2000. Trim and fill: a simple funnel‐plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta‐analysis. Biometrics. 56, 455–463.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO. 2020a. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020 – Key findings. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO. 2020b. FAOSTAT Statistics Database (updated December 2020). Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations, available in [http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ ].spa
dc.relation.referencesFelton, A., Knight, E., Wood, J., Zammit, C., Lindenmayer, D. 2010a. A meta-analysis of fauna and flora species richness and abundance in plantations and pasture lands. Biol. Conserv. 143, 545–554.spa
dc.relation.referencesFelton, A., Lindbladh, M., Brunet, J., Fritz, Ö. 2010b. Replacing coniferous monocultures with mixed-species production stands: an assessment of the potential benefits for forest biodiversity in northern Europe. For. Ecol. Manag. 260, 939–947.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoley, J.A., DeFries, R., Asner, G.P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S.R., Chapin, F.S., Coe, M.T., Daily, G.C., Gibbs, H.K., Helkowski, J.H., Holloway, T., Howard, E.A., Kucharik, C.J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J.A., Prentice, I.C., Ramankutty, N., Snyder, P. K. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science. 309, 570–574.spa
dc.relation.referencesFolt, B., Reider, K.E. 2013. Leaf-litter herpetofaunal richness, abundance, and community assembly in mono-dominant plantations and primary forest of northeastern Costa Rica. Biodivers. Conserv. 22, 2057–2070.spa
dc.relation.referencesFontúrbel, F.E., Candia, A.B., Malebrán, J., Salazar, D.A., González-Browne, C., Medel, R. 2015. Meta-analysis of anthropogenic habitat disturbance effects on animal-mediated seed dispersal. Glob. Chang Biol. 21, 3951–3960.spa
dc.relation.referencesGainsbury, A.M., Colli, G.R. 2014. Effects of abandoned Eucalyptus plantations on lizard communities in the Brazilian Cerrado. Biodivers. Conserv. 23, 3155–3170.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, J.D.D., Arévalo, J.R., Fernández-Palacios, J.M. 2007. Road edge effect on the abundance of the lizard Gallotia galloti (Sauria: Lacertidae) in two Canary Islands forests. Biodivers. Conserv. 16, 2949–2963.spa
dc.relation.referencesGardner, T.A., Ribeiro-Júnior, M.A., Barlow, J., Ávila-Pires, T.C.S., Hoogmoed, M.S., Peres, C.A. 2007. The value of primary, secondary, and plantation forests for a neotropical herpetofauna. Conserv. Biol. 21, 775–787.spa
dc.relation.referencesGibson, L., Lee, T.M., Koh, L.P., Brook. B.W., Gardner, T.A., Barlow, J., Peres, C.A., Bradshaw, C.J.A., Laurance, W.F., Lovejoy, T.E., Sodhi, V.S. 2011. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature. 478, 378–481.spa
dc.relation.referencesGilroy, J.J., Prescott, G.W., Cardenas, J.S., Castañeda, P.G.D.P., Sánchez, A., Rojas‐ Murcia, L.E., Medina, C.A., Haugaasen, T., Edwards, D.P. 2015. Minimizing the biodiversity impact of Neotropical oil palm development. Glob. Chang Biol. 21, 1531– 1540.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoodale, E., Kotagama, S.W., Raman, T.S., Sidhu, S., Goodale, U., Parker, S., Chen, J. 2014. The response of birds and mixed-species bird flocks to human-modified landscapes in Sri Lanka and southern India. For. Ecol. Manag. 329, 384–392.spa
dc.relation.referencesGreenhawk, N. 2015. Testing sustainable forestry methods in Puerto Rico: Does the presence of the introduced timber tree Blue Mahoe, Talipariti elatum, affect the abundance of Anolis gundlachi? Herpetol. Notes. 8, 141–148.spa
dc.relation.referencesGurevitch, J., Nakagawa, S. 2015. Research synthesis methods in ecology. Ecological Statistics: Contemporary Theory and Application. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaddock, C.K., Rindskopf, D., Shadish, W.R. 1998. Using odds ratios as effect sizes for meta-analysis of dichotomous data: A primer on methods and issues. Psychol. Methods. 3, 339–353.spa
dc.relation.referencesHartley, M.J. 2002. Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 155, 81–95.spa
dc.relation.referencesHättenschwiler, S., Tiunov, A.V., Scheu, S. 2005. Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36, 191–218.spa
dc.relation.referencesHedges, L.V., Gurevitch, J., Curtis, P.S. 1999. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology. 80, 1150–1156.spa
dc.relation.referencesHillebrand, H. 2008. Meta-Analysis in Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, Chichister, UKspa
dc.relation.referencesHunter, M.C., Smith, R.G., Schipanski, M.E., Atwood, L.W., Mortensen, D.A. 2017. Agriculture in 2050: recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. BioScience. 67, 386–391.spa
dc.relation.referencesJackson, R.B., Schlesinger, W.H. 2004. Curbing the US carbon deficit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 15827–15829spa
dc.relation.referencesJackson, R.B., Schlesinger, W.H. 2004. Curbing the US carbon deficit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 15827–15829spa
dc.relation.referencesJenkins, C.N., Pimm, S.L., Joppa, L.N. 2013. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, E2602–E2610.spa
dc.relation.referencesJennions, M.D., Moller, A.P. 2002. Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the ‘trim and fill’ method. Biol. Rev. 77, 211–222.spa
dc.relation.referencesKier, G., Kreft, H., Lee, T.M., Jetz, W., Ibisch, P.L., Nowicki, C., Mutke, J., Barthlott, W. 2009. A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 9322–9327.spa
dc.relation.referencesKing, D.I., Hernandez-Mayorga, M.D., Trubey, R., Raudales, R., Rappole, J. H. 2007. An evaluation of the contribution of cultivated allspice (Pimenta dioca) to vertebrate biodiversity conservation in Nicaragua. Biodivers. Conserv. 16, 1299–1320.spa
dc.relation.referencesKudavidanage, E.P., Wanger, T.C., De Alwis, C., Sanjeewa, S., Kotagama, S.W. 2012. Amphibian and butterfly diversity across a tropical land‐use gradient in Sri Lanka; implications for conservation decision making. Anim. Conserv. 15, 253–265.spa
dc.relation.referencesKurz, D.J., Nowakowski, A.J., Tingley, M.W., Donnelly, M.A., Wilcove, D.S. 2014. Forest-land use complementarity modifies community structure of a tropical herpetofauna. Biol. Conserv. 170, 246–255.spa
dc.relation.referencesLamb, D. 1998. Large‐scale ecological restoration of degraded tropical forest lands: the potential role of timber plantations. Restor. Ecol. 6, 271–279.spa
dc.relation.referencesLamb, D., Keenan, R., Gould, K., 2001. Historical background to plantation development in the tropics: a north Queensland case study. In: H. S.R., Herbohn, J.L., (Ed.), Sustainable Farm Forestry in the Tropics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 9–20.spa
dc.relation.referencesLamoreux, J.F., Morrison, J.C., Ricketts, T.H., Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., McKnight, M. W., Shugart, H.H. 2006. Global tests of biodiversity concordance and the importance of endemism. Nature. 440, 212–214.spa
dc.relation.referencesLiebhold, A.M., Brockerhoff, E.G., Kalisz, S., Nuñez, M.A., Wardle, D.A., Wingfield, M.J. 2017. Biological invasions in forest ecosystems. Biol. Invasions. 19, 3437–3458.spa
dc.relation.referencesLindenmayer, D.B., Hobbs, R.J., Salt, D. 2003. Plantation forests and biodiversity conservation. Aust. For. 66, 62–66.spa
dc.relation.referencesLindenmayer, D.B., Hobbs, R.J. 2004. Fauna conservation in Australian plantation forests–a review. Biol. Conserv. 119, 151–168.spa
dc.relation.referencesLittle, C., Cuevas, J.G., Lara, A., Pino, M., Schoenholtz, S. 2015. Buffer effects of streamside native forests on water provision in watersheds dominated by exotic forest plantations. Ecohydrology. 8, 1205–1217.spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez‐Bedoya, P.A., Magura, T., Edwards, F.A., Edwards, D.P., Rey‐Benayas, J.M., Lövei, G. L., Noriega, J.A. 2021. What level of native beetle diversity can be supported by forestry plantations? A global synthesis. Insect Conserv. Divers. 14, 736–747.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarroquín-Páramo, J.A., Suazo-Ortuño, I., Urbina-Cardona, N., Benítez-Malvido, J. 2021. Cumulative effects of high intensity hurricanes on herpetofaunal assemblages along a tropical dry forest chronosequence. For. Ecol. Manag. 479, 118505.spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez-Falcón, A.P., Zurita, G.A., Ortega-Martínez, I.J., Moreno, C.E. 2018. Populations and assemblages living on the edge: dung beetles responses to forests-pasture ecotones. PeerJ. 6, e6148.spa
dc.relation.referencesMasiero, M., Secco, L., Pettenella, D., Brotto, L. 2015. Standards and guidelines for forest plantation management: a global comparative study. For. Policy Econ. 53, 29–44.spa
dc.relation.referencesMeijer, S.S., Whittaker, R.J., Borges, P.A. 2011. The effects of land-use change on arthropod richness and abundance on Santa Maria Island (Azores): unmanaged plantations favour endemic beetles. J. Insect Conserv. 15, 505–522.spa
dc.relation.referencesMeli, P., Holl, K.D., Benayas, J.M.R., Jones, H.P., Jones, P.C., Montoya, D., MorenoMateos, D. 2017. A global review of past land use, climate, and active vs. passive restoration effects on forest recovery. PLoS ONE. 12, e0171368.spa
dc.relation.referencesMengersen, K., Jennions, M.D., Schmid, C. 2013. Statistical models for the meta-analysis of non-independent data. In: Koricheva, J., Gurevitch, J., Mengersen, K. (Eds.), Handbook of meta-analysis in ecology and evolution. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp. 255–264spa
dc.relation.referencesMoher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6: e1000097.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorrone, J.J. 2008. Endemism. Encyclopedia of Ecology. 3, 81–86.spa
dc.relation.referencesNakagawa, S., Noble, D.W., Senior, A.M., Lagisz, M. 2017. Meta-evaluation of metaanalysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists. BMC Biology. 15, 1–14.spa
dc.relation.referencesNavas, C.A., Otani, L. 2007. Physiology, environmental change, and anuran conservation. Phyllomedusa. 6, 83–103.spa
dc.relation.referencesNepal, P., Korhonen, J., Prestemon, J.P., Cubbage, F.W. 2019. Projecting global planted forest area developments and the associated impacts on global forest product markets. J. Environ. Manage. 240, 421–430.spa
dc.relation.referencesNewbold T., Hudson, L.N., Phillips, H.R.P., Hill, S.L.L., Contu, S., Lysenko, I., Blandon, A., Butchart, S.H.M., Booth, H.L., Day, J., Palma, A., Harrison, M.L.K., Kirkpatrick, L., Pynegar, E., Robinson, A., Simpson, J., Mace, G.M., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Purvis, A. 2014. A global model of the response of tropical and sub-tropical forest biodiversity to anthropogenic pressures. Proc. Royal Soc. B. 281, 20141371.spa
dc.relation.referencesNewbold, T., Hudson, L.N., Hill, S.L.L., Contu, S., Lysenko, I., Senior, R.A., Börger, L., Bennett, D.J., Choimes, A., Collen, B., Day, J., De Palma, A., Díaz, A., EcheverriaLondoño, S., Edgar, M.J., Feldman, A., Garon, M., Harrison, M.L.K., Alhusseini, T., Ingram, D.J., Itescu, Y., Kattge, J., Kemp, V., Kirkpatrick, L., Kleyer, M., Correia, D.L.P., Martin, C.D., Meiri, S., Novosolov, M., Pan, Y., Phillips, H.R.P., Purves, D.W., Robinson, A., Simpson, J., Tuck, S.L., Weiher, E., White, H.J., Ewers, R.M,. Mace, G.M., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Purvis, A. 2015. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature, 520, 45–50.spa
dc.relation.referencesNowakowski, A.J., Watling, J.I., Thompson, M.E., Brusch IV, G.A., Catenazzi, A., Whitfield, S.M., Kurz, D.J., Suárez-Mayorga, A., Aponte-Gutiérrez, A., Donnelly, M.A., Todd, B.D. 2018. Thermal biology mediates responses of amphibians and reptiles to habitat modification. Ecol. Lett. 21, 345–355.spa
dc.relation.referencesOyarzún, C., Godoy, R., Staelens, J., Aracena, C., Proschle, J. 2005. Nitrogen fluxes in a Nothofagus obliqua forest and a Pinus radiata plantation in the central valley of southern Chile. Gayana Bot. 62, 88–97.spa
dc.relation.referencesPalacios, C.P., Agüero, B., Simonetti, J.A. 2013. Agroforestry systems as habitat for herpetofauna: is there supporting evidence? Agrofor. Syst. 87,517–523.spa
dc.relation.referencesPalmeirim, A.F., Vieira, M.V., Peres, C.A. 2017. Herpetofaunal responses to anthropogenic forest habitat modification across the neotropics: insights from partitioning β-diversity. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 2877–2891.spa
dc.relation.referencesParry, L., Barlow, J., Peres, C.A. 2007. Large-vertebrate assemblages of primary and secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon. J. Trop. Ecol. 23, 653–662.spa
dc.relation.referencesPirard, R., Dal Secco, L., Warman, R. 2016. Do timber plantations contribute to forest conservation? Environ. Sci. Policy. 57, 122–130.spa
dc.relation.referencesProença, V.M., Pereira, H.M., Guilherme, J., Vicente, L. 2010. Plant and bird diversity in natural forests and in native and exotic plantations in NW Portugal. Acta Oecol. 36, 219– 226.spa
dc.relation.referencesPromis, Á. 2020. Plantaciones nativas o exóticas: Reflexiones sobre los impactos ambientales en Chile. Ecol. Austral. 30, 191–198.spa
dc.relation.referencesPulido, M., Schnabel, S., Lavado Contador, J.F., Lozano‐Parra, J., González, F. 2016. The impact of heavy grazing on soil quality and pasture production in rangelands of SW Spain. Land Degrad. Dev. 29, 219–230.spa
dc.relation.referencesPyšek, P., Blackburn, T.M., García-Berthou, E., Perglová, I., Rabitsch, W. 2017. Displacement and Local Extinction of Native and Endemic Species. In: Vilà M., Hulme P. (eds) Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services. Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology. 12, pp. 157–175.spa
dc.relation.referencesRethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B. 2021. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst. Rev. 10, 1–19.spa
dc.relation.referencesRivera, A.C. 2011. Cuando los árboles no dejan ver el bosque: efectos de los monocultivos forestales en la conservación de la biodiversidad. Acta Biol. Colomb. 16, 247–268.spa
dc.relation.referencesRivera-Ortiz, F.A., Aguilar, R., Arizmendi, M.D.C., Quesada-Avendaño, M., Oyama, K. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and genetic variability of tetrapod populations. Anim. Conserv. 18, 249–258.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoach, N.S., Urbina-Cardona, N., Lacher Jr, T.E. 2020. Land cover drives amphibian diversity across steep elevational gradients in an isolated neotropical mountain range: Implications for community conservation. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 22, e00968.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobson, T.C., Baker, A.C., Murray, B.R. 2009. Differences in leaf‐litter invertebrate assemblages between radiata pine plantations and neighbouring native eucalypt woodland. Austral Ecol. 34, 368–376.spa
dc.relation.referencesRosenberg, MS., Adamas, D.C., Gurevitch, J. 2000. MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-analysis. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesRosenthal, R. 1979. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol. Bull. 86, 638–641.spa
dc.relation.referencesRubio, A.V., Simonetti, J.A. 2011. Lizard assemblages in a fragmented landscape of central Chile. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 57, 195–199.spa
dc.relation.referencesSambuichi, R.H., Vidal, D.B., Piasentin, F.B., Jardim, J.G., Viana, T.G., Menezes, A.A., Mello, D.L.N., Ahnert, D., Baligar, V.C. 2012. Cabruca agroforests in southern Bahia, Brazil: tree component, management practices and tree species conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 21, 1055–1077.spa
dc.relation.referencesSahlean, T.C., Papeș, M., Strugariu, A., Gherghel, I. 2020. Ecological corridors for the amphibians and reptiles in the Natura 2000 sites of Romania. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–11.spa
dc.relation.referencesSedjo, R.A. 1999. The potential of high-yield plantation forestry for meeting timber needs. New Forests. 17, 339–360.spa
dc.relation.referencesSenior, A.M., Grueber, C.E., Kamiya, T., Lagisz, M., O’ Dwyer, K., Santos, E.S.A., Nakagawa, S. 2016. Heterogeneity in ecological and evolutionary meta-analyses: its magnitude and implications. Ecology. 97, 3293–3299.spa
dc.relation.referencesSenior, R.A., Hill, J.K., González del Pliego, P., Goode, L.K., Edwards, D.P. 2017. A pantropical analysis of the impacts of forest degradation and conversion on local temperature. Ecol. Evol. 7, 7897–7908.spa
dc.relation.referencesSimonetti, J.A., Grez, A.A., Estades, C.F. 2012. Biodiversity conservation in agroforestry landscapes: Challenges and opportunities. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago de Chile.spa
dc.relation.referencesSheldon, K.S., Yang, S., Tewksbury, J.J. 2011. Climate change and community disassembly: impacts of warming on tropical and temperate montane community structure. Ecol. Lett. 14, 1191–1200.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuazo-Ortuño, I., Alvarado-Díaz, J., Mendoza, E., López-Toledo, L., Lara-Uribe, N., Márquez-Camargo, C., Paz-Gutiérrez, J.G., Rangel-Orozco, D.J. 2015. High resilience of herpetofaunal communities in a human-modified tropical dry forest landscape in western Mexico. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 8, 396–423.spa
dc.relation.referencesSung, Y.H., Karraker, N.E., Hau, B.C. 2012. Terrestrial herpetofaunal assemblages in secondary forests and exotic Lophostemon confertus plantations in South China. For. Ecol. Manag. 270, 71–77.spa
dc.relation.referencesTeixido, A.L., Sehn, H., Quintanilla, L.G., Gonçalves, S.R., Férnandez‐Arellano, G.J., Dáttilo, W., Izzo, T.J., Layme, V.M.G., Moreira, L.F.B. 2021. A meta‐analysis of the effects of fragmentation on the megadiverse herpetofauna of Brazil. Biotropica. 53, 726– 737.spa
dc.relation.referencesThomas, C.D., Cameron, A., Green, R.E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L.J., Collingham, Y.C., Erasmus, B.F.N., de Siqueira, M.F., Grainger, A., Hannah, L., Hughes, L., Huntley, B., van Jaarsveld, A.S., Midgley, G.F., Miles, L., Ortega-Huerta, M.A., Peterson, A.T., Phillips, O.L., Williams, S.E. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. 427, 145–148.spa
dc.relation.referencesThompson, M.E., Donelly, M.A. 2018. Effects of secondary forest succession on amphibians and reptiles: A review and meta-analysis. Copeia. 106, 10–19.spa
dc.relation.referencesTingley, R., Meiri, S., Chapple, D.G. 2016. Addressing knowledge gaps in reptile conservation. Biol. Conserv. 204, 1–5.spa
dc.relation.referencesTrimble, M.J., Van Aarde, R.J. 2014. Amphibian and reptile communities and functional groups over a land‐use gradient in a coastal tropical forest landscape of high richness and endemicity. Anim. Conserv. 17, 441–453.spa
dc.relation.referencesVitt, L.J., Caldwell, J.P. 2014. Herpetology: an introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles. Fourth edition. Elsevier, London.spa
dc.relation.referencesWalker, G.R., Zhang, L., Ellis, T.W., Hatton, T.J., Petheram, C. 2002. Estimating impacts of changed land use on recharge: review of modelling and other approaches appropriates for management of dryland salinity. Hydrogeol. J. 10, 68–90.spa
dc.relation.referencesWanger, T.C., Iskandar, D.T., Motzke, I., Brook, B.W., Sodhi, N.S., Clough, Y., Tscharntke, T. 2010. Effects of land‐use change on community composition of tropical amphibians and reptiles in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Conserv. Biol. 24, 795–802.spa
dc.relation.referencesWatling, J.I., Braga, L. 2015. Desiccation resistance explains amphibian distributions in a fragmented tropical forest landscape. Landsc. Ecol. 30, 1449–1459.spa
dc.relation.referencesWatling, J.I., Arroyo‐Rodríguez, V., Pfeifer, M., Baeten, L., Banks‐Leite, C., Cisneros, L.M., Fang, R., Hamel-Leigue, A.C., Lachat, T., Leal, I.R., Lens, L., Possingham, H.P., Raheem, D.C., Ribeiro, D.B., Slade, E.M., Urbina-Cardona, J.N., Wood, E.M., Fahrig, L. 2020. Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies. Ecol. Lett. 23, 674–681.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoungquist, M.B., Boone, M.D. 2014. Movement of amphibians through agricultural landscapes: The role of habitat on edge permeability. Biol. Conserv. 175, 148–155.spa
dc.relation.referencesZamorano-Elgueta, C., Benayas, J.M.R., Cayuela, L., Hantson, S., Armenteras, D. 2015. Native forest replacement by exotic plantations in southern Chile (1985–2011) and partial compensation by natural regeneration. For. Ecol. Manag. 345, 10–20.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.subject.proposalManagementeng
dc.subject.proposalAmphibianeng
dc.subject.proposalReptileeng
dc.subject.proposalBiodiversityeng
dc.subject.proposalNativeeng
dc.subject.proposalExoticeng
dc.subject.proposalConservationeng
dc.subject.unescoMedio ambiente
dc.subject.unescoGestión forestal
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cfspa
dc.description.degreenameBiólogo(a)spa
dc.publisher.programBiologíaspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
ErikaAlejandra_CardonaGalvis_2 ...
Tamaño:
1.351Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Documento de tesis de pregrado
Ver/
Thumbnail
Nombre:
carta-autorizacion-publicacion ...
Tamaño:
303.1Kb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Carta de autorización para la ...
Ver/
Thumbnail
Nombre:
Acta sustentacion ERIKA ALEJANDRA ...
Tamaño:
191.0Kb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Acta de sustentación aprobada
Ver/
Thumbnail
Nombre:
Carta Autorizac Publicacion ...
Tamaño:
345.5Kb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Carta de autorización para la ...
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem