Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorLópez Pinzón, Margarita
dc.contributor.authorPeña Ruiz, Rodrigo
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-19T20:53:29Z
dc.date.available2021-08-19T20:53:29Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-18
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/16975
dc.descriptionIlustraciones, gráficasspa
dc.description.abstractspa: Este artículo reporta los hallazgos de una intervención pedagógica, que implementó estrategias de comunicación para fomentar las habilidades de expresión oral de los alumnos. Las estrategias destinadas a (a) reducir la confianza de los alumnos en su L1, (b) para fortalecer su fluidez oral L2, y (c) para reducir su filtro afectivo al realizar tareas orales. Veintidós estudiantes universitarios participaron en el etapa de intervención, que consistió en seis talleres. Fueron implementados e incluidos varias estrategias de comunicación. Los datos recopilados, en la etapa de acción, mostraron que Las estrategias de comunicación tuvieron un efecto positivo en la competencia oral L2 de los alumnos y sugirieron que la implementación de estas estrategias y las tareas orales apropiadas fueron beneficiosas para ampliar y refinar su léxico, mejorar su fluidez y bajar su filtro afectivo.spa
dc.description.abstracteng: This paper reports the findings of a pedagogical intervention, which implemented communication strategies to foster learners’ speaking skills. The strategies aimed (a) to reduce learners’ reliance on their L1, (b) to strengthen their L2 oral fluency, and (c) to lower their affective filter when performing oral tasks. Twenty-two university learners participated in the intervention stage, which consisted of six workshops. They were implemented, and included several communication strategies. Data collected, in the action stage, showed that communication strategies had a positive effect on learners’ L2 oral proficiency, and suggested that the implementation of these strategies and appropriate oral tasks were beneficial to broaden and to refine their lexicon, to improve their fluency, and to lower their affective filter.eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsIntroduction/1 Research Problem/ 1.1 Purpose / 1.2 Description of the Context and Setting / 1.3 Description of the Problem / 1.4 Research Question and Objectives/ 1.4.1 Research Question/ 1.4.2 Objectives/ 2 Literature Review / 2.1 Theoretical Framework / 2.1.1 Speaking/ 2.1.2 Speaking Activities / 2.1.3 Communication Strategies / 2.1.4 Compensatory Strategies/ 2.1.5 Time-gaining Strategies/ 2.1.6 Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT)/2.1.7 Affective Filter/ 2.1.8 Fluency/ 2.1.9 Vocabulary / COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES IN LEARNERS’ SPEAKING SKILLS 2.2 Previous Related Studies/ 3 Research Methodology/ 3.1 Type of Study/ 3.2 Participants/ 3.3 Instruments/ 4 Research Stages/ 4.1 Diagnostic Stage/ 4.2 Instructional Design/ 4.3 Action Stage / 4.4 Evaluation Stage/ 5 Findings/6 Conclusions / References/ Appendix A/ Appendix B/ Appendix C/ Appendix D/ Appendix E / Appendix F.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.titleImproving EFL learners’ speaking skills through communication strategieseng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.notesNO autorizo publicación de tesis ya que estoy en proceso de publicación de este artículo en una revista.spa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad de Caldasspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio institucional Universidad de Caldasspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/spa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Artes y Humanidadesspa
dc.publisher.placeManizalesspa
dc.relation.referencesAbdi, M., Eslami, H. and Zahedi, Y. (2012). The Impact of Pre-task Planning on the Fluency and Accuracy of Iranian EFL Learners’ Oral Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 2281-2288spa
dc.relation.referencesBachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBailey, K. (2005). Practical English language teaching: Speaking. New York, NY: McGrawHill.spa
dc.relation.referencesBygate, M. (1999). Quality of language and purpose of task: patterns of learners’ language on two oral communication tasks. Language Teaching Research, 3 (3), 185-214.spa
dc.relation.referencesBygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford: Oxford OUPspa
dc.relation.referencesCanale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1spa
dc.relation.referencesCastro, A. & López, S. (2014). Communication strategies used by pre-service English teachers of different proficiency levels. HOW, 21 (1), 10-25spa
dc.relation.referencesChambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency? Elsevier Science Ltd, 25(4), 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(97)00046-8spa
dc.relation.referencesChastain, K. (1998). Developing second language skills (2nd Ed.). Chicago: Harcourt Brace Publishers.spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publicationsspa
dc.relation.referencesDörnyei, Z. (1995). On the Teachability of Communication Strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 29 (1), 55. doi: 10.2307/3587805spa
dc.relation.referencesGillies, R. (2007). Cooperative learning. (1st Ed.) Los Angeles: SAGEspa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, J. (2008). Encyclopedia of bilingual education. Los Angeles: SAGE.spa
dc.relation.referencesHammerly, H. (1991). Fluency and Accuracy: Toward Balance in Language Teaching and Learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesHerazo, J. (2010). Authentic Oral Interaction in the EFL Class: What It Means, What It Does not. PROFILE, 12 (1), 47-61.spa
dc.relation.referencesHymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings (p. 269- 293). London: Penguin.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrashen, S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional (2016). Derechos básicos de aprendizaje: Inglés grados 6.° a 11.° Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia. Recuperado de http://goo.gl/c7JCwNspa
dc.relation.referencesNakatani, Y. (2005). The Effects of Awareness-Raising Training on Oral Communication Strategy Use. The Modern Language Journal, 89 (1), 76-91.spa
dc.relation.referencesNeuman, S. B., & Dwyer, J. (2009). Missing in action: Vocabulary instruction in pre‐K. The reading teacher, 62(5), 384-392.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (2018). Teaching speaking to young learners. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesOxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, US: Heinle & Heinle.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrieto, C. (2007). Improving Eleventh Graders’ Oral Production in English Class through Cooperative Learning Strategies. Profile, 8, 75-90spa
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSavignon, S.J. (1991). Communicative language teaching: The state of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (2), 261-277.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTarone, E. (1981). Some Thoughts on the Notion of Communication Strategy. TESOL Quarterly, 15(3), 285-295. doi: 10.2307/3586754spa
dc.relation.referencesThornbury, S. (2005). How to teach speaking. (1st Ed.) Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilkins, D. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. Suffolk: The Chaucer Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesWillis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. (1st Ed.) Harlow, [GB]: Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesXiaoyan, D. (2009). The Affective Filter in Second Language Teaching. Asian Social Science, 5(8), 162-165.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.subject.lembComunicación
dc.subject.lembPedagogía
dc.subject.lembAlumnos
dc.subject.proposalAffective filtereng
dc.subject.proposalCommunication strategieseng
dc.subject.proposalFluencyeng
dc.subject.proposalL2 repertoireeng
dc.subject.proposalTask-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) Approacheng
dc.subject.proposalOral taskseng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbspa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Didáctica del Inglés - Cartagenaspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés - Cartagenaspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem