Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Los efectos subletales de los acaricidas son más nocivos para los ácaros depredadores Phytoseiulus macropilis Banks (Acari: Phytoseiidae) que para la plaga Tetranychus Urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae)

dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Hamiltonspa
dc.contributor.authorSoto-Giraldo, Albertospa
dc.contributor.authorHernández-García, Rutilio Gustavospa
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2020-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.issued2020-07-01
dc.identifier.issn0123-3068
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17151/bccm.2020.24.2.3
dc.description.abstractEvaluar el efecto letal y subletal de los acaricidas abamectina y dimetoato al depredador P. macropilis y su presa T. urticae. Alcance: Efecto letal y subletal de los acaricidas a P. macropilis y T. urticae. Metodología: Se determinó en experimentos de laboratorio el efecto letal y subletal de los acaricidas abamectina y dimetoato al depredador P. macropilis y su presa T. urticae. Principales resultados: T. urticae fue 2.6 veces y 4.2 veces más tolerante que P. macropilis a la abamectina y al dimetoato, respectivamente. La tasa instantánea de crecimiento poblacional de la presa y el depredador disminuyó linealmente con el aumento de las concentraciones de ambos acaricidas. Sin embargo, la tasa instantánea de crecimiento poblacional del depredador disminuyó más rápidamente que la de la plaga, lo que resultó en la extinción de las poblaciones del depredador, mientras que la población de plagas persistió. Conclusiones: Los agricultores pueden lograr un mejor control de la plaga no aplicando acaricidas, sino manejando las poblaciones de este depredador en el campo utilizando técnicas naturales de conservación del enemigo.spa
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the lethal and sublethal effect of the abamectin and dimethoate acaricides on the predator P. macropilis and its prey T. urticae. Scope: Lethal and sublethal effect of acaricides on P. macropilis and T. urticae. Methodology: The lethal and sublethal effect of the abamectin and dimethoate acaricides on the predator P. macropilis and its prey T. urticae was determined in laboratory experiments. Main results: T. urticae was 2.6-fold and 4.2-fold more tolerant than P. macropilis to abamectin and dimethoate, respectively. The instantaneous rate of increase of prey and predator decreased linearly with increasing concentrations of both acaricides. However, the instantaneous rate of increase of the predator population decreased more rapidly than that of the pest, resulting in extinction of predator populations, whereas the pest population persisted. Conclusions: Farmers may achieve better control by not spraying acaricides, but managing the populations of this predator in the field using natural enemy conservation techniques.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfeng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBoletín Científicospa
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2020 Boletín Científico. Centro de Museoseng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.sourcehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/view/3673eng
dc.subjectBiological controleng
dc.subjectlethal concentrationeng
dc.subjectpopulation increaseeng
dc.subjectControl biológicospa
dc.subjectconcentración letalspa
dc.subjectincremento poblacionalspa
dc.titleLos efectos subletales de los acaricidas son más nocivos para los ácaros depredadores Phytoseiulus macropilis Banks (Acari: Phytoseiidae) que para la plaga Tetranychus Urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae)spa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeSección Conservación y Biodiversidad en Agroecosistemasspa
dc.typeJournal Articleeng
dc.identifier.doi10.17151/bccm.2020.24.2.3
dc.identifier.eissn2462-8190
dc.relation.citationendpage52
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage43
dc.relation.citationvolume24spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBoletín Científico. Centro de Museosspa
dc.relation.referencesAbraham, C.M., Braman, S.K., Oetting, R.D. and Hinkle, N.C. (2013). Compatibility of pesticides with natural enemies for pest management in greenhouse gerbera daisies. Journal of economic entomology, 106(4),1590-1601. Doi 10.1603/ec12503eng
dc.relation.referencesAdesanya, A.W., Morales, M.A., Walsh, D.B. and Lavine, L.C. (2017). Mechanisms of resistance to three mite growth inhibitors of Tetranychus urticae in hops, Bulletin of entomological research, 108(1), 23-34. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485317000414eng
dc.relation.referencesCasida, J.E. and Durkin, K.A. (2013). Neuroactive insecticides: targets, selectivity, resistance, and secondary effects. Annual review of entomology, 58, 99–117.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153645eng
dc.relation.referencesChowdhurya, M.A.Z., Fakhruddin, A.N.M., Islam, M.N., Moniruzzaman, M., Gan, S.H. and Alam, M.K. (2013). Detection of the residues of nineteen pesticides in fresh vegetable samples using gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Food control, 34, 457-465.eng
dc.relation.referencesDekeyser, M. A., McDonald, P. T., Angle Jr, G. W., and Moore, R. C. (1996). D2341-A novel agent to control spider mites. In Brighton Crop Protection Conference: pests and diseases-1996: Volume 2: Proceedings of an international conference, Brighton, UK, 18-21 november 1996 (United Kingdom).eng
dc.relation.referencesFadini, M.A.M., Lemos, W.P, Pallini, A., Venzon, M. and Mourao, S.A. (2004). Herbivoria de Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) induz defesa direta em morangueiro? Neotropical entomology, 33(3), 293-297.eng
dc.relation.referencesFerrero, M., Calvo, F.J., Atuahiva, T., Tixier, M.S. and Kreiter, S. (2011). Biological control of Tetranychus evansi Baker and Pritchard and Tetranychus urticae Koch by Phytoseiulus longipes Evans in tomato greenhouses in Spain [Acari: Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae].Biological control, 58(1),30-35.eng
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Marí, F. and González-Zamora, J.E. (1999). Biological control of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) with naturally occurring predators in strawberry plantings in Valencia, Spain. Experimental and applied acarology, 23(6), 487–495.eng
dc.relation.referencesGerson, U. and Weintraub, P.G. (2012). Mites (Acari) as a factor in greenhouse management. Annual review of entomology, 57, 229-247.eng
dc.relation.referencesHassan, S.A., Bigler, F., Bogenschütz, H., Boller, E., Brun, J., Calis, J.N.M, … & Helyer, N. (1994). Results of the sixth joint pesticide testing programme of the IOBC/WPRS-working group «pesticides and beneficial organisms». Entomophaga, 39(1), 107-119|.eng
dc.relation.referencesKamelmanesh, M.M., Hesami, S., Namayandeh, A., Ahmadi, B. and Dorri, H.R. (2010). Evaluation of resistance mechanism of some navy bean genotypes to two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae). Plant protection journal ,2(2), 111-125.eng
dc.relation.referencesKazak, C. (2008). The development, predation and reproduction of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Hatay fed Tetranychus cinnabarinus Boisduval (Acari: Tetranychidae) larvae and protonymphs at different temperatures. Turkish journal of zoology, 32(4), 407–414.eng
dc.relation.referencesKim, S.S. and Yoo, S.S. (2002). Comparative toxicity of some acaricides to the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis and the twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. BioControl,47(5): 563–573.eng
dc.relation.referencesKrishna, R.A. and Bhaskar, H. (2016). Evaluation of selected acaro pathogenic fungi, botanicals and new acaricide molecules against Tetranychus urticae Koch (Prostigmata: Tetranychidae) on okra. Journal of tropical agriculture, 54(1), 1-21.eng
dc.relation.referencesMahmoud, S.S. and Croteau, R.B. (2002). Strategies for transgenic manipulation of monoterpene biosynthesis in plants. Trends in plant science, 7(8),366–373eng
dc.relation.referencesMcEwen, P. and Haskell, P.T. (Eds.). (2013). Ecotoxicology: pesticides and beneficial organisms. Dordrecht, Holanda: New Springer.eng
dc.relation.referencesMostafalou, S. and Abdollahi, M. (2012). Concerns of environmental persistence of pesticides and human chronic diseases. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol, 5, e002.eng
dc.relation.referencesOliveira, H., Janssen, A., Pallini, A., Venzon, M., Fadini, M. and Duarte, V. (2007). A phytoseiid predator from the tropics as potential biological control agent for the spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Biological Control, 42(2), 105-109. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.04.011eng
dc.relation.referencesRosario-Cruz, R., Almazán, C., Miller, R.J, Domínguez-García, D.I., Hernández-Ortiz, R. and de la Fuente, J. (2009). Genetic basis and impact of tick acaricide resistance. Frontiers in bioscience,14(7), 2657-2665.eng
dc.relation.referencesSAS Institute Inc. (2004). The Princomp procedure. In SAS Institute Inc SAS/STAT(®). SAS Press,14 (1), 7435-7478.eng
dc.relation.referencesSato, M.E., da Silva, M.Z., da Silva, R.B., de Souza Filho, M.F. and Raga, A. (2009). Monitoramento da resistência de Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) a abamectin e fenpyroximate em diversas culturas no Estado de São Paulo. Arquivos do instituto biológico 76(2): 217–223.eng
dc.relation.referencesSimmonds, S.P. (1971). Observations on the possible control of Tetranychus urticae on strawberries by Phytoseiulus persimilis. Plant Pathology, 20(3), 117-119. Doi: ttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1971.tb00526.xStumpf, N. and Nauen, R. (2001). Cross-resistance, inheritance and biochemistry of mitochondrial electron transport inhibitor-acaricide resistance in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 94(6), 1577-1583. Doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-94.6.1577eng
dc.relation.referencesVan Leeuwen, T., Vontas, J., Tsagkarakou, A., Dermauw, W. and Tirry, L. (2010). Acaricide resistance mechanisms in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and other important Acari: a review. Insect biochemistry and molecular Biology, 40(8), 563–572. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.05.008eng
dc.relation.referencesWaite, G.K. (1988). Integrated control of Tetranychus urticae in strawberry in south-east Queensland. Experimental and Applied Acarology,5, 23-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053814eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng
dc.title.translatedAcaricides sublethal effects are more harmful to predatory mite Phytoseiulus macropilis Banks (Acari: Phytoseiidae) than to the pest Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae)eng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501eng
dc.type.contentTexteng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 2 , Año 2020 : Julio - Diciembrespa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/download/3673/3387
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85eng
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2eng


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
Bol. cient. mus. hist. nat. univ. caldas-3673.pdf317.8Kbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Derechos de autor 2020 Boletín Científico. Centro de Museos
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Derechos de autor 2020 Boletín Científico. Centro de Museos