Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorNiiniluoto, Ilkka Maunuspa
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-23 00:00:00
dc.date.available2011-12-23 00:00:00
dc.date.issued2011-12-23
dc.identifier.issn0124-6127
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/614
dc.description.abstractMi objetivo en este artículo es plantear y discutir algunas de las preguntas filosóficas sobre la Realidad Virtual  (RV). El problema fundamental se refiere a la naturaleza ontológica de la realidad virtual: ¿es real o ficticia? ¿La  RV es comparable a ilusiones, alucinaciones, sueños, o mundos de ficción? ¿Son todas las categorías filosóficas  tradicionales suficientes para darnos la comprensión del fenómeno de la RV? Para abordar estas cuestiones,  emplearé como mis herramientas filosóficas la semántica de mundos posibles y las teorías lógicas de la  percepción y la imaginación. Mi conclusión principal es que la RV es comparable a una imagen en 3-D que  puede ser vista desde el interior.spa
dc.description.abstractMy aim in this paper is to raise and discuss some philosophical questions about Virtual Reality (VR). The most  fundamental problem concerns the ontological nature of VR: is it real or fictional? Is VR comparable to illusions,  hallucinations, dreams, or worlds of fiction? Are traditional philosophical categories at all sufficient to give us  understanding of the phenomenon of VR? In approaching these questions, I shall employ possible world  semantics and logical theories of perception and imagination as my philosophical tools. My main conclusion is  that VR is comparable to a 3-D picture which can be seen from the inside.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfeng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Caldasspa
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2011 Discusiones Filosóficaseng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.sourcehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/614eng
dc.subjectfictioneng
dc.subjecthallucinationeng
dc.subjectimaginationeng
dc.subjectperceptioneng
dc.subjectrealityeng
dc.subjectvirtual realityeng
dc.subjectficciónspa
dc.subjectalucinaciónspa
dc.subjectimaginaciónspa
dc.subjectpercepciónspa
dc.subjectrealidadspa
dc.subjectrealidad virtualspa
dc.titleMundos virtuales ficción y realidadspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeSección Artículosspa
dc.typeJournal Articleeng
dc.identifier.eissn2462-9596
dc.relation.citationendpage28
dc.relation.citationissue19spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage13
dc.relation.citationvolume12spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalDiscusiones Filosóficasspa
dc.relation.referencesAndrew, D. Concepts in film theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesDescartes, R. Discourse on method. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1968. Print.eng
dc.relation.references---. The meditations. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1968. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesDevitt, M. Realism and truth. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesGombrich, E. H., Hochberg, J. & Black, M. Art, perception, and reality. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesGoodman, N. Ways of world making. Hassocks: Harvester Press, 1978. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesHeim, M. Virtual realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesHintikka, J. The intentions of intentionality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1975. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesKaila, E. Reality and experience. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1979. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesLanger, S. Feeling and form. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1953. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesLeibniz, G. W. New essays on human understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesMehtonen, P. Old concepts and new poetics: Historia, argumentum, and the twelfth and early Thirteenth-Century Latin poetics of fiction. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica, 1996. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesNiiniluoto, I. “Remarks on the logic of perception”. I. Niiniluoto & E. Saarinen (Eds.). Intensional logic: theory and applications. Helsinki: The Philosophical Society of Finland, 1982. Print.eng
dc.relation.references---. “Imagination and fiction”. Journal of Semantics 4, 1986: 209-222. Print.eng
dc.relation.references---. Truthlikeness. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1987. Print.eng
dc.relation.references---. “Technology policy in a democratic state”. S. Hellsten, M. Kopperi, & O. Loukola (Eds.). Taking the liberal challenge seriously. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997. Print.eng
dc.relation.references---. Critical scientific realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999a. Print.eng
dc.relation.references---. “Film and reality”. E. Tarasti (Ed.). Snow, forest, silence: the Finnish tradition of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999b. Print.eng
dc.relation.references---. “Scepticism, fallibilism, and verisimilitude”. J. Sihvola (Ed.). Ancient scepticism and the sceptical tradition. Helsinki: The Philosophical Society of Finland, 2000. Print.eng
dc.relation.references---. “World 3: a critical defence”. Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford & David Miller (Eds.). Karl Popper: a centenary assessment, vol. II. Metaphysics and epistemology. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesPeirce, C. S. Collected papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931-35. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesPopper, K. R. Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.eng
dc.relation.referencesRheingold, H. Virtual reality. New York: Summit Books, 1991. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesRoutley, R. Exploring meinong’s jungle and beyond. Canberra: Australian National University, 1980.eng
dc.relation.referencesSartre, J. P. The psychology of imagination. London: Methuen, 1972. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesSearle, J. Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesSearle, J. Minds, brains, and science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984. Print.eng
dc.relation.referencesWalton, K. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990. Print.eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng
dc.title.translatedVirtual worlds, fiction, and realityeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501eng
dc.type.contentTexteng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 19 , Año 2011 : Julio - Diciembrespa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/614/538
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85eng
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2eng


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
discusionesfilosoficas-614.pdf2.317Mbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Derechos de autor 2011 Discusiones Filosóficas
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Derechos de autor 2011 Discusiones Filosóficas