Representaciones conceptuales y semánticas en ciencias cognitivas.

Destéfano, Mariela Natalia

doi:10.17151/difil.2019.20.35.4.

dc.contributor.author	Destéfano, Mariela Natalia	spa
dc.date.accessioned	2019-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned	2020-12-09T16:56:32Z
dc.date.available	2019-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available	2020-12-09T16:56:32Z
dc.date.issued	2019-07-01
dc.identifier.issn	0124-6127
dc.identifier.uri	https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2019.20.35.4.
dc.identifier.uri	https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/14789
dc.description.abstract	En este trabajo intentaré dar razones en contra del argumento de Jackendoff en el que se pretende identificar las representaciones conceptuales y semánticas. Sostendré que este argumento es incorrecto porque no toma en cuenta la evidencia neuropsicológica y psiquiátrica en su contra. Para ello, primero clarificaré filosóficamente en qué consisten ambos tipos de representaciones para luego argumentar en contra de la tesis de la identificación.	spa
dc.description.abstract	In this paper I will try to offer, reasons against Jackendoff's argument in which it is intended to identify conceptual and semantic representations. I will maintain that this argument is incorrect because it does not take into account the neuropsychological and psychiatric evidence against it. To do this, I will philosophically clarify what both types of representations consist of, and then, I will argue against the thesis of identification.	eng
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	spa
dc.language.iso	spa	spa
dc.publisher	Universidad de Caldas	spa
dc.rights	Derechos de autor 2019 Mariela Natalia Destéfano	spa
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0	spa
dc.source	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/311	spa
dc.subject	systematicity	eng
dc.subject	semantic features	eng
dc.subject	aphasia	eng
dc.subject	schizophrenia	eng
dc.subject	stimulus independence	eng
dc.subject	sistematicidad	spa
dc.subject	rasgos semánticos	spa
dc.subject	afasia	spa
dc.subject	esquizofrenia	spa
dc.subject	independencia del estímulo	spa
dc.title	Representaciones conceptuales y semánticas en ciencias cognitivas.	spa
dc.type	Sección Artículos	spa
dc.type	Artículo de revista	spa
dc.type	Journal Article	eng
dc.identifier.doi	10.17151/difil.2019.20.35.4.
dc.identifier.eissn	2462-9596
dc.relation.citationendpage	60
dc.relation.citationissue	35	spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage	45
dc.relation.citationvolume	20	spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournal	Discusiones Filosóficas	spa
dc.relation.references	Bermúdez Jose Luis. Thinking Without Words. Oxford: OUP, 2003.	spa
dc.relation.references	Camp Elisabeth. Putting Thoughts to Work: Concepts, Systematicity, and Stimulus-Independence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 2, 2009: 275-311.	spa
dc.relation.references	Camp Elisabeth. The Generality Constraint: Nonsense and Categorial Restrictions. Philosophical Quarterly. 54, 2004: 209-231. Caplan David. Language. Structure, Processing and Disorders. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1999.	spa
dc.relation.references	Chomsky Noam. Estructuras sintácticas. Madrid, Siglo XXI, 1965. Ellis Andrew W. y Andrew W. Young. Neuropsicología cognitiva humana. Barcelona: Masson, 1992.	spa
dc.relation.references	Evans Gareth. Varieties of Reference. Oxford: OUP, 1982. Grillon Christian, Amelie Rezvan y William M. Glazer. N400 and Semantic Categorization in Schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry. 29, 1991: 467-480.	spa
dc.relation.references	Hauser Marc, Noam Chomsky y Tecumseh Ficht. The Faculty of Language: What Is it, who Has it, and how did it Evolve?. Science. 298, 2002: 1569-1579.	spa
dc.relation.references	Howard D. y V. M Orchard-Lisle. On the origin of semantic errors in naming; evidence from the case of a global aphasic. Cognitive neuropsychology. 1984: 163-190.	spa
dc.relation.references	Fodor Jerry. Conceptos. Donde la ciencia cognitiva se equivocó. Barcelona: Gedisa, 1998.	spa
dc.relation.references	Fodor, Jerry. El lenguaje del pensamiento. Madrid: Alianza, 1975. Fromkin E. y K. D. Emorey. “El léxico mental”. Panorama de la lingüística moderna III. El lenguaje: aspectos biológicos y psicológicos. Madrid: Visor, 1991.	spa
dc.relation.references	Jackendoff Ray. “Language”. Cambridge Handbook to Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MA, CUP, 2011.	spa
dc.relation.references	Jackendoff Ray. Foundations of Language. Oxford: OUP, 2003.	spa
dc.relation.references	Jackendoff Ray. “The Architecture of the Linguistic-Spatial Interface”. Space and Language. Cambridge: MA, MIT Press, 1999. 9	spa
dc.relation.references	Jackendoff Ray. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge: MA, MIT Press, 1997.	spa
dc.relation.references	Jackendoff Ray. Semantic Structures. Cambridge: MA, MIT Press, 1990.	spa
dc.relation.references	Jackendoff Ray. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge: MA, MIT Press, 1993.	spa
dc.relation.references	Kéri J., G. Szekeres, I. Szendi, A. Antal, Z. Kováks, Z. Janka y J. Benedek. Category Leraning and Perceptual Categorization in Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 25, 1999: 593-600.	spa
dc.relation.references	Martínez-Manrique Fernando. On the Distinction between Semantic and Conceptual Representation. Dialectica. 64, 2010: 57-78.	spa
dc.relation.references	Marr David. Visión, Madrid: Alianza, 1982.	spa
dc.relation.references	Millikan Ruth. On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay about Substance Concepts. Cambridge: CUP, 2000.	spa
dc.relation.references	Monti Martin, Lawrence M Parsons y Daniel N Osherson. The Boundaries of Language and Thought in Deductive Inferences. PNAS. 106, 2009: 125554-125559.	spa
dc.relation.references	Piccinini Gualtiero y Sam Scott. Splitting Concepts. Philosophy of Science. 73, 2006: 390-409.	spa
dc.relation.references	Saffran E. M. Neuropsychological Approaches to Study of Language. British Journal of Psychology. 73, 1982: 317-337.	spa
dc.relation.references	Warrington Elizabeth. The Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 27, 1975: 635-657.	spa
dc.relation.references	Warrington E. K. y E. T. Shallice. Semantic access dyslexia. Brain. 102, 1979: 43-63.	spa
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	spa
dc.rights.creativecommons	Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.	spa
dc.title.translated	Conceptual and semantic representations in cognitive sciences.	eng
dc.type.coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501	spa
dc.type.content	Text	spa
dc.type.driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/article	spa
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion	spa
dc.relation.citationedition	Núm. 35 , Año 2019 : Julio - Diciembre	spa
dc.relation.bitstream	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/311/246
dc.type.coarversion	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85	spa
dc.rights.coar	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2	spa