Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMaya, Jorgespa
dc.contributor.authorPatiño Mazo, Everspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-09T16:53:01Z
dc.date.available2020-01-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2020-12-09T16:53:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.identifier.issn1794-7111
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2020.17.21.2
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/13790
dc.description.abstractUn repertorio interdisciplinario de las propiedades de las representaciones externas en diseño, tales como los sketches, es propuesto para explorar el rol funcional de dichas representaciones. Las propiedades y las funciones de las representaciones son múltiples. Sin embargo, invariablemente se estudian desde enfoques cognitivos o de diseño computacional, por lo que ciertos fenómenos, importantes para diferentes disciplinas del diseño, quedan por fuera. Consecuentemente, una revisión interdisciplinaria, documental, descriptiva y explicativa de la literatura se usa para aportar elementos de respuesta alrededor de tres preguntas: ¿qué son las representaciones, en ciencias duras y en diseño? ¿Cuáles son sus propiedades? ¿Y sus funciones? Así, primero, establecemos entonces elementos básicos sobre las representaciones en diseño; segundo, construimos un repertorio de las propiedades con un enfoque interdisciplinar, dando cuenta de consideraciones teórico-empíricas y elaborando las definiciones aportadas a través de múltiples argumentos basados en diferentes ciencias o disciplinas y en la práctica del diseño. Tercero, proponemos un esquema exploratorio y correlacional sobre la relación de dichas propiedades con las funciones. Por último, ofrecemos conclusiones, planteando vías de investigación futuras. Sugerimos cómo teorías procedentes de campos distintos, pueden combinarse, para desarrollar una teoría más comprensiva. El repertorio de propiedades puede ser útil para quien desee modelar el proceso de diseño y sus representaciones o para quien investigue sobre los métodos de representación.spa
dc.description.abstractAn interdisciplinary repertoire of the properties of external representations in design such as sketches, is proposed to explore the functional role of such representations. The properties and functions of the representations are multiple. However, they are invariably studied from cognitive approaches or computational design reason why certain phenomena, important for different disciplines of design, are left out. Consequently, an interdisciplinary, descriptive and explanatory review of the literature is used to provide elements of response around the following three questions: what are representations in hard sciences and in design? What are their properties? And, what are their functions? Thus, basic elements about representations in design are established in the first place and, secondly, a repertoire of properties with an interdisciplinary approach, giving account of theoretical-empirical considerations and elaborating the definitions provided through multiple arguments based on different sciences and/or disciplines and in the practice of design, is built. In the third place, an explorative and correlational scheme on the relationship of these properties with the functions is proposed. And, finally, conclusions suggesting future research paths are offered. The way in which theories from different fields can be combined to develop a more comprehensive theory is suggested. The repertoire of properties can be useful for those who want to model the design process and its representations or for those researching the representation methods.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisheruniversidad de Caldasspa
dc.rightsDerechos de autor Jorge Mayaspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/2334spa
dc.subjectdesigneng
dc.subjectdesign cognitioneng
dc.subjectexternal representationeng
dc.subjectinterdisciplinarityeng
dc.subjectmental representationeng
dc.subjectsketcheng
dc.subjectdiseño e interdisciplinaridadspa
dc.subjectdiseño y cogniciónspa
dc.subjectrepresentaciónspa
dc.subjectrepresentación externaspa
dc.subjectsketchspa
dc.titlePropiedades de las representaciones en diseño : una exploración interdisciplinaria de su rol funcional.spa
dc.typeSección Artículosspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal Articleeng
dc.identifier.doi10.17151/kepes.2020.17.21.2
dc.identifier.eissn2462-8115
dc.relation.citationendpage60
dc.relation.citationissue21spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage17
dc.relation.citationvolume17spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalKepesspa
dc.relation.referencesAkner-Koler, C. (2007). Form & formlessness: questioning aesthetic abstractions through art projects, cross-disciplinary studies and product design education. Axl Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesArnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. University of California Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBerghman, M. and Hekkert, P. (2017). Towards a unified model of aesthetic pleasure in design. New Ideas in Psychology, 47, 136-144. doi. org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.03.004spa
dc.relation.referencesBoujut, J.F. and Blanco, E. (2003). Intermediary objects as a means to foster cooperation in engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 12 (2), 205-219. Springer. doi.org/10.1023/A:1023980212097spa
dc.relation.referencesBrereton, M. (2004). Distributed Cognition in Engineering Design: Negotiating between Abstract and Material Representations. En: Goldschmidt y Porter (2004). Design Representation. London: Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, K., and Owen, C.L. (1997). Form language and style description. Design studies, 18 (3), 249-274. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00002-1spa
dc.relation.referencesChing, F.D., and Juroszek, S.P. (2010). Design drawing. John Wiley & Sons. Corremans, J. (2008). Basic Skills in the Study of Form-Generating Different Styling Proposals based on Variations in Surface Orientation. En: Clarke, A., Evatt, M., Hogarth, P., Lloveras, J. and Pons, L. (eds.) Proceedings of E&PDE 10th, 2008, Barcelona, Spain.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrawford, C.M. and Di Benedetto, C.A. (2003). New products management (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.spa
dc.relation.referencesDesmet, P.M. and Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design, 1 (1), 57-66.spa
dc.relation.referencesDondis, D.A. (1974). A Primer of visual literacy. MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesEastman, C. (2001). New directions in design cognition: studies of representation and recall. Elsevier.spa
dc.relation.referencesEdmonds, B.M. (1999). Syntactic measures of complexity. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester.spa
dc.relation.referencesEisentraut, R. and Günther, J. (1997). Individual styles of problem solving and their relation to representations in the design process. Design Studies, 18 (4), 369-383. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00007-0spa
dc.relation.referencesEissen, K. and Steur, R. (2014). Sketching Product Design Presentation. BISPublishers. Fonts.com. (2018) Anatomy of a Character. Recuperado de https://www.fonts.com/content/learning/fontology/level-1/type-anatomy/anatomy.spa
dc.relation.referencesFrankenberger, E., Badke-Schaub, P. and Birkhofer, H. (2012). Designers: the key to successful product development. Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesFridenzon-Harison, E. (2016). From Inspiration to Sketches (Fits) Methodology for Students of Product Design. En: Bohemia, E., Buck, L., Eriksen, K., Kovacevic, A., Ovesen, N., and Tollestrup, C. (eds.) Proceedings 18th E&PDE 2016; Aalborg, Denmark, 8th-9th September/2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesGalle, P. (1999). Design as intentional action: a conceptual analysis. Design Studies, 20(1), 57-81. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00021-0spa
dc.relation.referencesGarner, S. (2001) ‘Is sketching still relevant in virtual design studios?’, en: Proceedings Design Computing on the Net (DCNet 2000), 15-19 Jan, Sydney University. Recuperado de http://www.arch.usyd.edu.au/kcdc/conferences/DCNet00/index.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesGarner, S. and McDonagh-Philp, D. (2001). Problem interpretation and resolution via visual stimuli: the use of ‘mood boards’ in design education. J. Art Des. Educ. 20 (1), 57-64. doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00250spa
dc.relation.referencesGero, J. (1994). Towards a model of exploration in computer-aided design. Formal design methods for CAD, pp. 315-336.spa
dc.relation.referencesGibson, J.J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Oxford. Gigerenzer, G. and Todd, P.M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoguen, J.A. and Harrel, D.F. (2004). Information visualisation and semiotic morphisms, en: Malcolm (2004).spa
dc.relation.referencesGoldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4 (2), 123-143. doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534381spa
dc.relation.referencesGoldschmidt, G. (1999). “Design”, p. 525-526, en: Runco, M.A., Pritzker, S.R. (eds.) (1999).spa
dc.relation.referencesGoldschmidt, G. (2004). Design Representation: Private process, public image. En: Goldschmidt, G. y Porter, W. (2004). Design Representation. London: Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoldschmidt, G. (2014). Modeling the role of sketching in design idea generation. En: Chakrabarti, A. y Blessing, L.T.M. (eds.). An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design, pp. 433-450, Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoldschmidt, G. and Porter, W. (2004). Design Representation. London: Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoldschmidt, G. and Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27 (5), 549-569. doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.01.002.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoodman, N. (1976). Languages of Art. Hackett, Indianapolis.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrignon, M. (2000). Deux brouillons: Le croquis et la maquette. En: Genesis (14): Architecture, edited by P-M de-Biasi, Legault. Montreal: Centre Canadien d’Architecture/Jean-Michel Place, pp 153-162.spa
dc.relation.referencesHekkert, P. (2015). Aesthetic responses to design: a battle of impulses. En: Tinio, Smith (2015).spa
dc.relation.referencesHekkert, P. and Leder, H. (2008). Product Aesthetics. En: Schifferstein, H.N. & Hekkert, P. (eds.) (2008). Product experience (pp. 259-285). Elsevier, San Diego, CA.spa
dc.relation.referencesHutchinson, J.W., and Alba, J.W. (1991). Ignoring irrelevant information: Situational determinants of consumer learning. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 325-345. doi.org/10.1086/209263spa
dc.relation.referencesItti, L., Koch, C. and Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 20(11), 1254-1259. DOI: 10.1109/34.730558spa
dc.relation.referencesKulkarni, S., Summers, J.D., Vargas-Hernandez, N., and Shah, J.J. (2000). Collaborative Sketching (CoSketch) — An Idea Generation Technique for Engineering Design. Journal of Creative Behavior. 35 (3), 168-198. doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01045.xspa
dc.relation.referencesLeborg, C. (2006). Visual Grammar. Princeton Architectural Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLevinson, J. (2005). Philosophical Aesthetics: An overview. En: Levinson, J. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLloyd, P., and Snelders, D. (2003). What was Philippe Starck thinking of? Design Studies, 24(3), 237-253. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00054-6Getspa
dc.relation.referencesMalcolm, G. (2004). Multidisciplinary approaches to visual representations and interpretations (Vol. 2). Elsevier.spa
dc.relation.referencesMalhotra, N.K. (1996). Marketing Research, An applied Orientation. PrenticeHall.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarin, M. and Leder, H. (2013). Examining Complexity across Domains: Relating Subjective and Objective Measures of Affective Environmental Scenes, Paintings and Music. PloS one, 8(8), e72412. Public Library of Science.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarkman, A.B. (2005). Representation Formats in Psychology. En: Nadel (2005). doi.org/10.1002/0470018860.s00608spa
dc.relation.referencesMassironi, M. (2001). The psychology of graphic images: Seeing, drawing, communicating. Psychology Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMenezes, A., and Lawson, B. (2006). How designers perceive sketches. Design Studies, 27(5), 571-585. doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.02.001spa
dc.relation.referencesMogford, R.H., Guttman, J., Morrow, S., and Kopardekar, P. (1995). The Complexity Construct in Air Traffic Control: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Technical Report, CTA.spa
dc.relation.referencesNadel, L. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia of cognitive science. Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.1002/0470018860 Nefs, H.T. (2008). On the visual appearance of Objects. En: Schifferstein & Hekkert (2008).spa
dc.relation.referencesNgo, D.C.L., and Byrne, J.G. (1998). Aesthetic measures for screen design. En: Calderon, P.B. & Thomas, B. (eds.) Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference, Adelaide (pp. 64-71).spa
dc.relation.referencesNovick, L.R. (2005). Problem solving, Psychology of. En: Nadel (2005).spa
dc.relation.referencesOlofsson, E., and Sjolen, K. (2005). Design Sketching, KEEOS Design-Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesOtto, K.N., and Wood, K.L. (2000). Product Design. Pearson.spa
dc.relation.referencesPahl, G., Beitz, P., and Grote, K.H. (2007). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer. Pei, E. (2013). Building a common language of design representations for industrial designers and engineering designers. PhD Thesis, Loughborough University.spa
dc.relation.referencesPei, E., Campbell, I., and Evans, M.A. (2009). Building a Common Ground-The Use of Design Representation Cards for Enhancing Collaboration between Industrial Designers and Engineering Designers. En: Durling, D., Rust, C., Chen, L.-L., Ashton, P., & Friedman, K. (eds.). Proceedings Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference 2008, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK, 16-19 July 2008.spa
dc.relation.referencesPellegrino J.W., Rosinski, R.R., Chiesi, H.L., and Siegel, A. (1977). Picture–word differences in decision latency: an analysis of single and dual memorymodels. Memory and Cognition, 5, 383-396. doi.org/10.3758/BF03197377spa
dc.relation.referencesPerini, L. (2004). Convention, resemblance and isomorphism: understanding scientific visual representations, chapter 3, en: Malcolm, G. (2004).spa
dc.relation.referencesPetiot, J.F. and Yannou, B. (2004). Measuring consumer perceptions for a better comprehension, specification and assessment of product semantics. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 33 (6), 507-525. doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2003.12.004spa
dc.relation.referencesRamachandran, V.S. (2011). The Tell-Tale Brain. W.W. Norton-Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesReisberg, D., and Logie, R. (1993) The ins and outs of working memory: Overcoming the limits on learning from imagery, en: Roskos-Ewoldsen, Intons-Peterson M., Anderson, R. (eds). Imagery, Creativity and Discovery: a cognitive approach, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 39-76spa
dc.relation.referencesReymen, I., and Hammer, D. (2000). Design method supporting regular reflection on design situations. En: Horvath, I., Medland, A.J., and Vergeest, J.S.M. (eds.). Proceedings Third Symposium TMCE, Delft, pp.18-21.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoozenburg, N.F., and Eekels, J. (1995). Product design: fundamentals and methods (Vol. 2). Wiley, Chichester.spa
dc.relation.referencesRunco, M.A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier.spa
dc.relation.referencesRunco, M.A., and Pritzker, S.R. (1999). Encyclopedia of Creativity. (2 Vols.). Academic Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchenk, P. (2007). Developing a taxonomy on drawing for design. En: Poggenpohl, s. (ed.) Proceedings IASDR’07 Conference, Hong-Kong, 12-15 Nov., 2007spa
dc.relation.referencesSchifferstein, H.N., and Hekkert, P. (eds.) (2008). Product Experience. Elsevier.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchneider, W., and Shiffrin, R.M. (1977). “Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention”. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1-66. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How practitioners think in action. London: Temple-Smith. Schön, D., and Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing, Design Studies, 13(2), 135-153. doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(92)90268-Fspa
dc.relation.referencesSeifert, C.M. (2001). Situated cognition and Learning, en: Wilson y Keil (2001).spa
dc.relation.referencesSelf, J., Lee, S., and Bang, H. (2015). Perceptions of complexity in design representation: Implications for an understanding of design practice. The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, 9 (4), 33-46.spa
dc.relation.referencesShah, J.J., Kulkarni, S.V., and Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2000). Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122 (4), 377-384.doi:10.1115/1.1315592spa
dc.relation.referencesShah, J.J., Smith, S.M., and Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design studies, 24 (2),111-134. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00034-0spa
dc.relation.referencesSinger, J.L. (1999) Imagination, en: Runco y Pritzker, (1999). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, C.S. (1982). A Search for Structure. Selected Essays in Science, Art and History. MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, S.M., Ward, T.B., and Finke, R.A. (1995). The creative cognition approach. MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSnodgrass, J.G. (2005). Representations, Abstract and Concrete, en: Nadel (2005).spa
dc.relation.referencesSöderman, M. (2002). Comparing Desktop Virtual Reality with handmade sketches and real products: Exploring key aspects for end-users' understanding of proposed products. Journal of Design Research (2) 1. doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2002.009817spa
dc.relation.referencesSternnber, R.J., and Ben-Zeev, T. (2001). Complex Cognition. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuh, N.P. (1995). Axiomatic design of mechanical systems. Journal of Mechanical Design, 117 (B)2-10. doi:10.1115/1.2836467spa
dc.relation.referencesSuwa, M., Gero, J., and Purcell, T. (2000). Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process.Design Studies, 21 (6), 539-567. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00034-4spa
dc.relation.referencesTinio, P.L., and Smith, J.K. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTjalve, E. (1979). A short course in industrial design. Newnes-Butterworths, London.spa
dc.relation.referencesTversky, B. (2011). Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3 (3), 499- 535. doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.xspa
dc.relation.referencesUlrich, K.T., and Eppinger, S.D. (1995). Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, NY.spa
dc.relation.referencesVisser, W. (2007). Conception individuelle et collective. Approche de l’ergonomie cognitive. arXiv Preprint arXiv:0711.1290.spa
dc.relation.referencesVisser, W. (2010). Design as construction of representations. Art + Design, Psychology, (2), 29-43.spa
dc.relation.referencesVon Eckardt, B. (1999). Mental representation. En: Wilson, R.A. and Kiel, F.C. (Eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Sciences (pp. 527–529).spa
dc.relation.referencesVon Foerster, H. (1996). Visión y conocimiento: disfunciones de segundo orden. En: Prigogine y Fried-Schnitman. Nuevos paradigmas, cultura y subjetividad. Paidós.spa
dc.relation.referencesWallschlaeger, C., Busic-Snyder, C. and Morgan, M. (1992). Basic visual concepts and principles for artists, architects, and designers. McGraw-Hill.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilson, R.A., and Keil, F.C. (Eds.) (2001). The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. The MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWong, W. (1993). Principles of form and design. John Wiley & Sons.spa
dc.relation.referencesXing, J. and Manning, C.A. (2005). Complexity and Automation Displays of Air Traffic Control: Literature review and analysis. Technical Report, Office of Aerospace Medicine Washington, DC.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhao, H., Chen, J., Han, Y. and Cao, X. (2014). Image aesthetics enhancement using composition-based saliency detection. Multimedia Systems, 1-10. Springer. doi.org/10.1007/s00530-014-0373-1spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.spa
dc.title.translatedProperties of design representations : an interdisciplinary exploration of their functional role.eng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 21 , Año 2020 : Enero - Juniospa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/2334/2236
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
kepes-2334.pdf1.050Mbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Derechos de autor  Jorge Maya
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Derechos de autor Jorge Maya