Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorPérez-Jimén, Miguel Ángelspa
dc.contributor.authorSuárez-Acevedo, Camilaspa
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-04T14:55:29Z
dc.date.available2018-01-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2021-02-04T14:55:29Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.identifier.issn0124-6127
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2018.19.32.7.
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/15556
dc.description.abstractEste artículo defiende que la teorización sobre la capacidad para atención conjunta debe esclarecer los conceptos de intención y experiencia: una tarea eminentemente filosófica. Se exponen los aspectos psicológicos relevantes, las posiciones teóricas más destacadas y se analiza filosóficamente el estado de la cuestión. Se concluye que no hay consenso interteórico sobre los aspectos operacionales ni sobre los funcionales que definen la capacidad, y que la inmadurez de la teoría se debe a una elaboración todavía precaria de sus conceptos centrales, intención y experiencia, tarea en la que la filosofía realizaría un aporte decisivo.spa
dc.description.abstractThis paper defends that the theorization on the capacity for joint attention must clarify the concepts of experience and intention: a purely philosophical enterprise. The text exposes the main psychological aspects of the capacity, the most relevant theories on it and philosophically analyses the subject. It is concluded that there is no mature consensus among theories about the operational and functional role of joint attention, and that the immaturity of the theory rests on a deficient elaboration of the main concepts of intention and experience, a task in hich philosophy makes a significant contribution.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Caldasspa
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2018 Discusiones Filosóficasspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2845spa
dc.subjectJoint attentioneng
dc.subjectexperienceeng
dc.subjectintentioneng
dc.subjectphilosophy of psychologyeng
dc.subjectAtención conjuntaspa
dc.subjectexperienciaspa
dc.subjectintenciónspa
dc.subjectfilosofía de la psicologíaspa
dc.titleIntención y experiencia: retos para una teoría de la atención conjuntaspa
dc.typeSección Artículosspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal Articleeng
dc.identifier.doi10.17151/difil.2018.19.32.7.
dc.identifier.eissn2462-9596
dc.relation.citationendpage115
dc.relation.citationissue32spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage97
dc.relation.citationvolume19spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalDiscusiones Filosóficasspa
dc.relation.referencesAcero, Juan José. “Intención y aserción”. Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 26 (2). 2007:19-39. Web.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaron-Cohen, Simon. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 1995. Print.spa
dc.relation.references---. “The Eye Detection Detector (EDD) and the Shared Attention Mechanism (SAM): Two Cases for Evolutionary Psychology”. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 41-59. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesBruner, Jerome. Child’s talk. Learning to Use Language. New York: Oxford University Press. 1983. Print.spa
dc.relation.references---.“From Joint Attention to the Meeting of Minds: An Introduction”. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 1-14. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesButterworth, George. “Origins of Mind in Perception and Action”. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. Nueva York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 29-40. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarpenter, Melinda, et al. “Social Cognition, Joint Attention, and Communicative Competence from 9 to 15 Months of Age” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63 (4). 1998: 1-174. Web.spa
dc.relation.referencesCasasanto, Daniel. “Linguistic Relativity” Routledge handbook of semantics. New York: Routledge, 2016, 158-174. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesCorkum, Valerie and Chris Moore. “Development of Joint Visual Attention in Infants” Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development.spa
dc.relation.referencesNew York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 61-83. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavidson, Donald. Mente, mundo y acción. Barcelona: Paidós. 1992. Impreso.spa
dc.relation.referencesEscudero-Sanz, Alfonso, et al. “Aparición y desarrollo de la atención conjunta en la infancia” Anales de psicología, 29 (2). 2013: 402-412. Web.spa
dc.relation.referencesGopnik, Alison and Henry Wellman. “Why the child’s Theory of Mind really is a Theory?” Folk psychology. Cambridge: Wiley Blackwell. 1995. 233-258. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrice, Paul. “Logic and Conversation” Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts Nueva York: Academic Press. 1975: 41-58. Web.spa
dc.relation.referencesGunther, York. Essays on Nonconceptual Content. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 2003. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesHobson, Peter. “On Sharing Experiences” Development and psychopathology, 1. 1989: 197-203. Web.spa
dc.relation.references---.“What Puts the Jointness in Joint Attention?” Joint Attention, Communication and Other Minds. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005. 185-204. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesHobson, Peter and Jessica Hobson. “Joint Attention or Joint Engagement? Insights from Autism” Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. 115-135. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesKim, Jaegwon. Philosophy of Mind. Boulder: Westview Press. 2006. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesKita, Sotaro. Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2003. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoore, Chris and Philip Dunham. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. Printspa
dc.relation.referencesPérez Jiménez, Miguel Ángel. La aparición del pensamiento. Una enmienda emotiva a la tesis de Donald Davidson. Granada: Universidad de Granada. 2009. Impreso.spa
dc.relation.referencesRacine, Timothy. The Role of Shared Practice in the Origins of Joint Attention and Pointing. Simon Fraser University. 2005. Web.spa
dc.relation.references---.Getting beyond rich and lean views of joint attention” Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. 21-42. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesReddy, Vasudevi. “A Gaze at Grips with Me” Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. 137-157. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesScaife, Michael and Jerome Bruner. “The capacity of joint visual attention in the infant”. Nature, 253. 1975: 265-266. Web.spa
dc.relation.referencesSeeman, Axel. Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesSigman, Marian and Connie Kasari. “Joint Attention across Contexts in Normal and Autistic Children” Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 189-203. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesSolomon, Robert. Ética emocional: Una teoría de los sentimientos. Barcelona: Paidós. 2007. Impreso.spa
dc.relation.referencesTomasello, Michael and Jodie Todd. “Joint Attention and Early Lexical Acquisition Style” First language, 4. 1983: 197-212. Web.spa
dc.relation.referencesTomasello, Michael and Anne Cale Kruger. “Joint Attention on Actions. Acquiring Verbs in Ostensive and Non-Ostensive Contexts” Journal of Child Language, 19. 1992: 311-333. Web.spa
dc.relation.referencesTomasello, Michael et al. “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Social Cognition”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28. 2005: 675-735. Web.spa
dc.relation.referencesTomasello, Michael. “The Role of Joint Attention in Early Language Development” Language Sciences, 11. 1988: 69-88. Web.spa
dc.relation.references---. “Joint Attention as Social Cognition”. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 103-130. Print.spa
dc.relation.references---. Los orígenes culturales de la cognición humana. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores. 2007. Impreso.spa
dc.relation.referencesTrevarthen, Colwyn. “Los motivos primordiales para entenderse y cooperar” La comunicación preverbal, Barcelona: Ediciones Avesta. 1982. Impreso.spa
dc.relation.references---. “The Generation of Human Meaning: How Shared Experience Grows in Infancy”. Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. 73-113. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesWellman, Henry. The Child’s Theory of Mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 1990. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesWerner, Heinz and Bernard Kaplan. Symbol formation. New York: Psychology Press. 1963. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilde, Janet and Jodie Baird. Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. 2005. Print.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.title.translatedIntention and experience: challenges for a theory of joint attentioneng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 32 , Año 2018 : Enero - Juniospa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/2845/2629
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
discusionesfilosoficas-2845.pdf277.7Kbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Derechos de autor 2018 Discusiones Filosóficas
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Derechos de autor 2018 Discusiones Filosóficas