Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMiller, Davidspa
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-24 00:00:00
dc.date.available2011-06-24 00:00:00
dc.date.issued2011-06-24
dc.identifier.issn0124-6127
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/715
dc.description.abstractEste artículo presenta una comparación de las teorías de verdad, y las soluciones a la paradoja del mentiroso,  propuestas por Tomas Bradwardino (c. 1290–1349), Jean Buridan (c. 1295–1358), y Alfred Tarski (1901–1983).  Además realiza una breve crítica a la posición expuesta por Read en su artículo: The liar and the new T-schema.spa
dc.description.abstractThis paper undertakes a comparison of theories of truth and the solutions to the paradox of the liar advanced  by Thomas Bradwardine (c. 1290–1349), Jean Buridan (c. 1295–1358), and Alfred Tarski (1901– 1983). In addition,  it offers a brief criticism to Read’s point of views as expounded in his paper: The liar and the new T-schema.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Caldasspa
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2011 Discusiones Filosóficasspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/715spa
dc.subjectSelf-referenceeng
dc.subjectBradwardineeng
dc.subjectBuridaneng
dc.subjectTarskieng
dc.subjectparadox of the Liareng
dc.subjectdiagonalization methodeng
dc.subjecttheory of meaningeng
dc.subjecttheories of trutheng
dc.subjectAutorreferenciaspa
dc.subjectBradwardinospa
dc.subjectBuridanspa
dc.subjectTarskispa
dc.subjectparadoja del mentirosospa
dc.subjectmétodo de diagonalizaciónspa
dc.subjectteoría de la significaciónspa
dc.subjectteorías de la verdadspa
dc.titleVerdades antiguas y modernasspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeSección Artículosspa
dc.typeJournal Articleeng
dc.identifier.eissn2462-9596
dc.relation.citationendpage227
dc.relation.citationissue18spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage207
dc.relation.citationvolume12spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalDiscusiones Filosóficasspa
dc.relation.referencesBellhouse, D. R. “De Vetula: A Medieval Manuscript Containing Probability Calculations”. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 68, 2000. 123-136. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlack, M. Language and Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1949. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoyer, C. B. The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development. Nueva Iorque: Hafner Publishing Company, Inc. Reimprimido 1959. Nueva Iorque: Dover Publications, Inc, 1949. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoldstein, L. “Epimenides and Curry”. Analysis 46, 1986. 117-121. Print.spa
dc.relation.references- - -. “Doubting Thomas: from Bradwardine back to Anon”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 65-85. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrant, E. “Bradwardine and Galileo: Equality of Velocities in the Void”. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 2, 1965. 344-364. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiller, D. W. Reseña de Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot. Philosophy 85, 3, 2008. 433-436. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesMills, E. “Scheming and Lying”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 113–128. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesMou, B. “The Enumerative Character of Tarski’s Definition of Truth and Its General Character in a Tarskian System”. Synthese 126, 2001. 91–122. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesPanaccio, C. “Restrictionism: A Medieval Approach Revisited”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 229–253. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesQuine, W. V. O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. The Philosophical Review 60, 1951. 20-43. Reprinted. From A Logical Point of View. W. V. O. Quine. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1953. 20-46. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesRahman, S., Tulenheimo, T., and Genot, E. Unity, Truth and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2008. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesRead, S. L. “The Truth Schema and the Liar”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008a. 3-17. Print.spa
dc.relation.references- - -. “Further Thoughts on Tarski’s T-scheme and the Liar”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008b. 205-225. Print.spa
dc.relation.references- - -. Thomas Bradwardine, “Insolubilia”. Paris, Lovaina, Walpole MA: Peeters, 2010. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesRestall, G. “Models for Liars in Bradwardine’s Theory of Truth”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 135–147. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesSandu, G. “Read on the Liar”. Approaching Truth. Essays in Honour of Ilkka Niiniluoto. Eds. Pihlström, S., Raatikainen, P. and Sintonen, M. Londres: College Publications. 2007. 129–140. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpade, P. V. “Insolubilia and Bradwardine’s Theory of Signification”. Medioevo: Revista di storia delle filosofia medievale 7, 1981. 115–134. Lies, Language and Logic in the Late Middle Ages. Reprinted as chapter IV of P. V. Spade, 1988. Londres: Variorum Reprints.spa
dc.relation.referencesTarski, A. “Grundzüge des Systemenkalkül”. Fundamenta Mathematicae 25, 1935–1936. 503–526, and 26. 2. 283–301. Las referencias son a la traducción inglesa. “Foundations of the Calculus of Systems”, capítulo XII, 1956. 342–383. Print.spa
dc.relation.references________. “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 1944. 341-375. Print.spa
dc.relation.references_________. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956. Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesWright, C.J. G. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1992. Print.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.title.translatedAncient and modern truthseng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 18 , Año 2011 : Enero - Juniospa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/715/638
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
discusionesfilosoficas-715.pdf355.5Kbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Derechos de autor 2011 Discusiones Filosóficas
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Derechos de autor 2011 Discusiones Filosóficas