¿Necesitamos reformar el viejo esquema t?

Woleński, Jan

dc.contributor.author	Woleński, Jan	spa
dc.date.accessioned	2012-06-22 00:00:00
dc.date.available	2012-06-22 00:00:00
dc.date.issued	2012-06-22
dc.identifier.issn	0124-6127
dc.identifier.uri	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/645
dc.description.abstract	Este artículo comenta de manera crítica el análisis de Stephen Read del esquema T ofrecido en su artículo: “The&nbsp; Liar and the new T-scheme”. Sostengo que Read malinterpreta los planteamientos de Tarski en algunos puntos&nbsp; y que el esquema A que introduce Read en su artículo, es o bien reducible al viejo esquema T (tarskiano) o bien&nbsp; plantea una serie de dudas esenciales.	spa
dc.description.abstract	This paper critically comments Stephen Read’s analysis of the T-scheme offered in his paper: “The Liar and the&nbsp; new T-scheme”. I argue that Read misinterprets Tarski in some points and that the A-scheme introduced in&nbsp; Read’s paper is either reducible to the old (Tarskian) Tscheme or raises essential doubts. &nbsp;	eng
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	eng
dc.language.iso	eng	eng
dc.publisher	Universidad de Caldas	spa
dc.rights	Derechos de autor 2012 Discusiones Filosóficas	eng
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/	eng
dc.source	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/645	eng
dc.subject	Falsehood	eng
dc.subject	inconsistency	eng
dc.subject	intensionality	eng
dc.subject	provability	eng
dc.subject	Read	eng
dc.subject	Tarski	eng
dc.subject	tautology	eng
dc.subject	the Liar	eng
dc.subject	truth	eng
dc.subject	T-sentences	eng
dc.subject	Falsedad	spa
dc.subject	inconsistencia	spa
dc.subject	intencionalidad	spa
dc.subject	probabilidad	spa
dc.subject	Read	spa
dc.subject	Tarski	spa
dc.subject	tautología	spa
dc.subject	el mentiroso	spa
dc.subject	verdad	spa
dc.subject	oraciones T	spa
dc.title	¿Necesitamos reformar el viejo esquema t?	spa
dc.type	Artículo de revista	spa
dc.type	Sección Artículos	spa
dc.type	Journal Article	eng
dc.identifier.eissn	2462-9596
dc.relation.citationendpage	285
dc.relation.citationissue	20	spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage	273
dc.relation.citationvolume	13	spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournal	Discusiones Filosóficas	spa
dc.relation.references	Dutillh Novaes, Catarina. “Tarski’s hidden theory of meaning: Sentences say exactly”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 41-64. Print.	eng
dc.relation.references	Miller, David. “Verdades, antiguas y modernas”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Ene.-Jun. 2011: 207-227. Impreso.	eng
dc.relation.references	Rahman, Shahid., Tero Tulenheimo and Emmanuel Genot. Eds. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. Print.	eng
dc.relation.references	Read, Stephen. “The Truth-Schema and the Liar”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 3-18. Print.	eng
dc.relation.references	---. “Further thoughts on Tarski’s T-scheme and the Liar”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 205-228. Print.	eng
dc.relation.references	---. “The Liar and the new truth-Schema”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul.-Dic. 2010: 119-137. Print.	eng
dc.relation.references	---. “Miller, Bradwardine and truth”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Ene.-Jul. 2011: 229-235. Print.	eng
dc.relation.references	Sandu, Gabriel. “Read on the Liar”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul.-Dic. 2011: 277-290. Print.	eng
dc.relation.references	Tarski, Alfred. “The concept of truth in formalized languages”. Logic, semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933. Print.	eng
dc.relation.references	---. “The semantic concept of truth and the foundations of semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1944: 341-375. Print.	eng
dc.relation.references	Woleński, Jan. “Read about T-scheme”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 199-203. Print.	eng
dc.relation.references	---. Semantics and truth. Forthcoming.	eng
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	eng
dc.title.translated	¿Do we need to reform the old t-scheme?	eng
dc.type.coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501	eng
dc.type.content	Text	eng
dc.type.driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/article	eng
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion	eng
dc.relation.citationedition	Núm. 20 , Año 2012 : Enero - Junio	spa
dc.relation.bitstream	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/645/568
dc.type.coarversion	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85	eng
dc.rights.coar	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2	eng