dc.contributor.author | Woleński, Jan | spa |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-22 00:00:00 | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-22 00:00:00 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-06-22 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0124-6127 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/645 | |
dc.description.abstract | Este artículo comenta de manera crítica el análisis de Stephen Read del esquema T ofrecido en su artículo: “The  Liar and the new T-scheme”. Sostengo que Read malinterpreta los planteamientos de Tarski en algunos puntos  y que el esquema A que introduce Read en su artículo, es o bien reducible al viejo esquema T (tarskiano) o bien  plantea una serie de dudas esenciales. | spa |
dc.description.abstract | This paper critically comments Stephen Read’s analysis of the T-scheme offered in his paper: “The Liar and the  new T-scheme”. I argue that Read misinterprets Tarski in some points and that the A-scheme introduced in  Read’s paper is either reducible to the old (Tarskian) Tscheme or raises essential doubts.
  | eng |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | eng |
dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
dc.publisher | Universidad de Caldas | spa |
dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2012 Discusiones Filosóficas | eng |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | eng |
dc.source | https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/645 | eng |
dc.subject | Falsehood | eng |
dc.subject | inconsistency | eng |
dc.subject | intensionality | eng |
dc.subject | provability | eng |
dc.subject | Read | eng |
dc.subject | Tarski | eng |
dc.subject | tautology | eng |
dc.subject | the Liar | eng |
dc.subject | truth | eng |
dc.subject | T-sentences | eng |
dc.subject | Falsedad | spa |
dc.subject | inconsistencia | spa |
dc.subject | intencionalidad | spa |
dc.subject | probabilidad | spa |
dc.subject | Read | spa |
dc.subject | Tarski | spa |
dc.subject | tautología | spa |
dc.subject | el mentiroso | spa |
dc.subject | verdad | spa |
dc.subject | oraciones T | spa |
dc.title | ¿Necesitamos reformar el viejo esquema t? | spa |
dc.type | Artículo de revista | spa |
dc.type | Sección Artículos | spa |
dc.type | Journal Article | eng |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2462-9596 | |
dc.relation.citationendpage | 285 | |
dc.relation.citationissue | 20 | spa |
dc.relation.citationstartpage | 273 | |
dc.relation.citationvolume | 13 | spa |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Discusiones Filosóficas | spa |
dc.relation.references | Dutillh Novaes, Catarina. “Tarski’s hidden theory of meaning: Sentences say exactly”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 41-64. Print. | eng |
dc.relation.references | Miller, David. “Verdades, antiguas y modernas”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Ene.-Jun. 2011: 207-227. Impreso. | eng |
dc.relation.references | Rahman, Shahid., Tero Tulenheimo and Emmanuel Genot. Eds. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. Print. | eng |
dc.relation.references | Read, Stephen. “The Truth-Schema and the Liar”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 3-18. Print. | eng |
dc.relation.references | ---. “Further thoughts on Tarski’s T-scheme and the Liar”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 205-228. Print. | eng |
dc.relation.references | ---. “The Liar and the new truth-Schema”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul.-Dic. 2010: 119-137. Print. | eng |
dc.relation.references | ---. “Miller, Bradwardine and truth”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Ene.-Jul. 2011: 229-235. Print. | eng |
dc.relation.references | Sandu, Gabriel. “Read on the Liar”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul.-Dic. 2011: 277-290. Print. | eng |
dc.relation.references | Tarski, Alfred. “The concept of truth in formalized languages”. Logic, semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933. Print. | eng |
dc.relation.references | ---. “The semantic concept of truth and the foundations of semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1944: 341-375. Print. | eng |
dc.relation.references | Woleński, Jan. “Read about T-scheme”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 199-203. Print. | eng |
dc.relation.references | ---. Semantics and truth. Forthcoming. | eng |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | eng |
dc.title.translated | ¿Do we need to reform the old t-scheme? | eng |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | eng |
dc.type.content | Text | eng |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | eng |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | eng |
dc.relation.citationedition | Núm. 20 , Año 2012 : Enero - Junio | spa |
dc.relation.bitstream | https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/645/568 | |
dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | eng |
dc.rights.coar | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | eng |