Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorNarváez Alarcón, Cristian Andrésspa
dc.contributor.authorGarnica Gaitán, Germán Andrésspa
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-09T16:51:04Z
dc.date.available2019-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2020-12-09T16:51:04Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-01
dc.identifier.issn1794-7111
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2019.16.20.13
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/13103
dc.description.abstractLas personas con dificultades en la producción del lenguaje deben enfrentarse a situaciones que les hace depender día a día de otras personas, ya que no pueden comunicar sus pensamientos ni necesidades. Para ayudar a estas personas los sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA) ofrecen la posibilidad de transmitir información a partir de la selección de componentes gráficos que representan la realidad, entre los problemas de este tipo de sistemas se encuentran los bajos niveles de usabilidad en las interfaces gráficas y el uso de pictogramas que no se adecuan al contexto y lenguaje de los usuarios. Este trabajo presenta una serie de factores a tener en cuenta al momento de diseñar una interfaz gráfica para sistemas CAA y la evaluación de material gráfico diseñado específicamente para el contexto de los usuarios con afasia, una enfermedad que se caracteriza por la pérdida de la capacidad de producir y comprender el lenguaje oral y escrito. Las pruebas señalan que adicional a la posibilidad de modificar factores de posición, tamaño y color, es necesario incluir imágenes que hagan parte del contexto del usuario facilitando la selección de las imágenes relevantes para la creación del mensaje. Los resultados de esta propuesta pueden ser de utilidad para desarrolladores de sistemas CAA ya que sirven como guía para el diseño de interfaces que facilitan al usuario la creación de frases.spa
dc.description.abstractPeople with language production disabilities must challenge different situations in which they depend on others to share their feelings and necessities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems had emerged as an alternative to give the possibility of sharing information using graphic content selection. Some problems this kind of systems have are the low user interfaces usability levels, the nonuse of context and the lack of language-related pictograms. In this paper, a set of factors to be taken into account at the AAC systems interface design process are presented. This work also shows the evaluation of graphic content designed specifically for the context of users with aphasia, an impairment characterized by the loss of capabilities to understand and produce writing or speech. Test results showed that besides the modification of position, size, and color factors it’s necessary to include relevant images according to the user’s context facilitating the production of the message. The proposal results can be used by AAC systems developers as a guide to the development of interfaces that enhance the sentences creation process.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisheruniversidad de Caldasspa
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2019 Cristian Andrés Narváezspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/188spa
dc.subjectaugmentative and alternative communication systems (AAC)eng
dc.subjectgraphic interfaces designeng
dc.subjectusabilityeng
dc.subjectdiseño de interfaces gráficasspa
dc.subjectsistema de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa (CAA)spa
dc.subjectusabilidadspa
dc.titleLineamientos para el diseño de interfaces gráficas y componentes gráficos de sistemas de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa.spa
dc.typeSección Artículosspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal Articleeng
dc.identifier.doi10.17151/kepes.2019.16.20.13
dc.identifier.eissn2462-8115
dc.relation.citationendpage375
dc.relation.citationissue20spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage345
dc.relation.citationvolume16spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalKepesspa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Arifi, B., Al-Rubaian, A., Al-Ofisan, G., Al-Romi, N., & Al-Wabil, A. (2013, July). Towards an arabic language augmentative and alternative communication application for autism. International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability ,333-341. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://10.1007/978-3-642-39241-2_37.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl Mahmud, A. and Martens, J. (2016). Social networking through email: studying email usage patterns of persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, vol. 30, 186-210.spa
dc.relation.referencesBabic, J., Slivar, I., Car, Z. and Podobnik, V. (2015). Prototype-driven software development process for augmentative and alternative communication applications. 13th International Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL). DOI: https://10.1109/ConTEL.2015.7231204.spa
dc.relation.referencesBelani, H. (2012, June). Towards a usability requirements taxonomy for mobile AAC services. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Usability and Accessibility Focused Requirements Engineering (pp. 36-39). IEEE Press. DOI: https://10.1109/usare.2012.6226789.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlake, M. (2000). Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, vol. 16, 180-185). DOI: https://10.1080/07434610012331279034.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavidson, B., Howe, T., Worrall, L., Hickson, L., and Togher, L. (2008). Social participation for older people with aphasia: The impact of communication disability on friendships. Topics in stroke rehabilitation, vol. 15, 325-340. DOI: https://10.1310/tsr1504-325.spa
dc.relation.referencesDumas, J. (2002, January). User-based evaluations. In The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1093-1117). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. ISBN: 0- 8058-3838-4.spa
dc.relation.referencesHigginbotham, D. and Bedrosian, J. (1995). Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, vol. 11, 11-13. DOI: https://10.1080/07434619512331277099.spa
dc.relation.referencesHillis, A. (2007). Aphasia progress in the last quarter of a century. Neurology, vol. 69, 200-213. DOI: https://10.1212/01.wnl.0000265600.69385.6f.spa
dc.relation.referencesHornero, G., Conde, D., Quílez, M., Domingo, S., Rodríguez, M., Romero, B. and Casas, O. (2015). A wireless augmentative and alternative communication system for people with speech disabilities., IEEE Access, vol. 3, 1288-1297. DOI: https://10.1109/access.2015.2466110.spa
dc.relation.referencesInternational Organization for Standardization. (2018). Ergonomics of humansystem interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts (ISO 9241- 11:2018). Recuperado de https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en.spa
dc.relation.referencesKeskinen, T., Heimonen, T., Turunen, M. Rajaniemi, J. and Kauppinen, S. (2012). SymbolChat: A flexible picture-based communication platform for users with intellectual disabilities. Interacting with Computers, vol. 24, 374-386. DOI: https://10.1016/j.intcom.2012.06.003.spa
dc.relation.referencesLam, J. & Wodchis, W. (2010). The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in Ontario hospital-based long-term care residents. Medical care, 48, 380-387. DOI: https://10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca2647.spa
dc.relation.referencesLight, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). The Changing Face of Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Past, Present, and Future Challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 197-204. DOI: https://10.3109/07434618.2012.737024.spa
dc.relation.referencesSalminen, A., Petrie, H. and Ryan, S. (2004). Impact of computer augmented communication on the daily lives of speech-impaired children. Part I: Daily communication and activities., Technology and Disability, vol. 16, 157- 167. DOI: https://10.3233/tad-2004-16306.spa
dc.relation.referencesChan, R. (2014). Cloud augmentative and alternative communication for people with complex communication needs. Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (2727-2732). IEEE. DOI: https://10.1109/glocom.2014.7037220.spa
dc.relation.referencesMancilla, D., Sastoque, S., & Iregui, M. (2015, January). Towards ontology personalization to enrich social conversations on AAC systems. In 10th International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis (Vol. 9287, p. 92870Z). International Society for Optics and Photonics. DOI: https://10.1117/12.2073865.spa
dc.relation.referencesMancilla, D., Sastoque, S., Mendoza, J. and Iregui, M. (2013). Conceptualizing a daily activities ontology for an augmentative and alternative communication system. 5th Latin American Conference on Networked and Electronic Media (LACNEM-2013). Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Manizales. DOI: https://10.1117/12.2073865.spa
dc.relation.referencesNarváez, C. Sastoque, S. and Iregui, M. (2015). Spanish language generation engine to enhance the syntactic quality of AAC systems. 11th International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis (SIPAIM 2015). DOI: https://10.1117/12.2211435spa
dc.relation.referencesQuesenbery, W. (2004). Balancing the 5Es of Usability. Cutter IT Journal, vol. 17, 4-11.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández, S. S., Mancilla, D., Medina, J. M., & Iregui, M. (2014). Usercentric Recommendation Model for AAC based on Multi-criteria Planning. International Conference on Advances in Human-oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies and Services. ISBN: 978-1-61208-369-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesSastoque, S., Narváez, C. y Garnica, G. (2016). Metodología para la construcción de Interfaces Gráficas Centradas en el Usuario. Nuevas Ideas en Informática Educativa, vol. 12, 314-324. ISBN: 978-956-19-0989-2.spa
dc.relation.referencesSaturno, C., Ramirez, A., Conte, M., Farhat, M., y Piucco, E. (2015). An augmentative and alternative communication tool for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 34, 632-645. DOI: https://10.1080/0144929X.2015.1019567.spa
dc.relation.referencesSeffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R. y Padda, H. (2006). Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model. Software Quality Journal, vol. 14, 159-178. DOI: https://10.1007/s11219-006-7600-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesStent, A. & Bangalore, S., Natural language generation in interactive systems. Cambridge University Press, 2014. DOI: https://10.1007/CBO9780511844492.spa
dc.relation.referencesThe State of Queensland, Complex communication needs (2018). Retrieved from https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/58540/complexcommunication-needs.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesVan, E. and Alant, E. (2004). Associations with Minspeak™ icons. Journal of communication disorders, vol. 37, 255-274. DOI: https://10.1016/j.jcomdis.2003.10.002.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.spa
dc.title.translatedGraphic interfaces and graphic components design guidelines for augmentative and alternative communication systems.eng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 20 , Año 2019 : Julio - Diciembrespa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/188/148
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
kepes-188.pdf721.5Kbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Derechos de autor 2019 Cristian Andrés Narváez
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Derechos de autor 2019 Cristian Andrés Narváez